Edited by Brig, 11 December 2007 - 03:44 PM.
Crazy Price for a Sweetheart Pin
Posted 11 December 2007 - 03:39 PM
Posted 11 December 2007 - 04:02 PM
Posted 12 December 2007 - 06:50 PM
Posted 12 December 2007 - 06:52 PM
You are missing something, because it is not a sweetheart pin!!
Okay Major Mike - give us some tips. A lot of us look at pinbacks and automatically assume "sweetheart..."
Posted 12 December 2007 - 07:04 PM
Posted 12 December 2007 - 07:11 PM
I bought it because it is a better left side match to the one I currently have. The other left one I have, is marked sterling. These did come in sets and were pinback. Era is probably late 1930's, but until photo evidence surfaces (I have over 1000 photos of Marine officers and havent seen these being worn), I can not say for sure. Because they were pinback, I believe that they were not extremely popular with Marine officers and may have even been phased out early by the maker. I have not seen another set. Like I have said before, there are grey areas that certain EGAs fall into when you start applying hardfast rules to them. So many buck the regs with method of attachment, type of material, style, size, and continent application. And so many have different marks. Just because it is not marked sterling, does not mean that it is not sterling.
(BROKEN LINK REMOVED)
Edited by Brig, 14 May 2014 - 12:48 PM.
Posted 12 December 2007 - 07:13 PM
Edited by Brig, 12 December 2007 - 07:16 PM.
Posted 12 December 2007 - 07:31 PM
I know some collar emblems were pinback, but I presumed they were jeweler made. Too many times what I thought was a pinback collar emblem was a sweetheart, and I have been told that collar emblems were supposed to be screwback. I noticed you throwing in some bids on some items, Major, and tended to back down because I don't have that kind of a salary. Could you provide us with some more information on these? thanks
Money and what the other guy says has nothing to do with it (though it can help you out when you are first starting), it's your own experience and judgment that is your best asset.
Posted 12 December 2007 - 07:49 PM
When we observe unattached emblems and puzzle over the types of construction and fasteners we tend think in terms of what we know about how our insignia is worn rather than how they wore them back then. Epaulets were only required for the Aide-de-camp to the President and officers assigned for duty at the White House only. Knots, shoulder were required by all Commissioned officers except commissioned warrant officers. The full dress and evening uniforms having epaulets and shoulder knots are scarce and we may be looking at some of those gems in this thread.
Posted 13 December 2007 - 06:45 PM
Tim, with the single emblem from the auction being in dress mode, for the port side and having a pinback fastener, and also having the Meyer "service" pattern design, not that firms usually found dress pattern, I think anyone could have mistaken it for a "sweetheart" pin. I know I did! On first seeing it on eBay, I thought it might be Meyer's attempt at WWII sweetheart jewelry, much like the H&H sweetheart pinback emblems that look identical to that firms service emblems, except in dress mode. It's seeing the matching starboard side emblem that's the clincher that it is much more than a sweetheart pin. I will agree that this is a very unusual and rare set of emblems in this pattern. Maybe the Major can share dimensional sizes with us? Are they service size emblems, or the larger dress size? Bob, great information! Thanks!
Edited by teufelhunde.ret, 15 March 2008 - 04:49 AM.
dupe quote / scan
Posted 16 December 2007 - 01:19 AM
The size is identical to that of the very common post backed service devices made by Meyer (I've put a pic on as well as the other variation marked sterling). Anchor is 1-3/16" long with the whole piece being the same tall. I think Bob has the right idea that these were made for the knots, as screwpost insignia would be impossible to get on.
(BROKEN LINKS REMOVED)
Edited by Brig, 14 May 2014 - 12:49 PM.
Posted 15 March 2008 - 04:48 AM
You are in the EGA "reference section". This area is were posts from the EGA "discussion section" are moved for permanent retention and education about the history of the Eagle, Globe and Anchor. As time moves forward there maybe additional information the EGA Moderators wish to add or will add to this specific post. We ask for your input as well.
We encourage further comments about this post and its content. In order to do so, you will need to start a new post in the "EGA discussion area" which is listed in the main page under insignia. And as needed we will be pleased to move any new and or valued information that is derived from your post (and subsequent comments) into this reference area as its own standing post.
Please be advised; posting and or editing is restricted on this post to moderator's and forum staff
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users