I thought I was the only one who did that.

Where does your information come from?   The tags in the shirt should prove your point but they don’t, the tags are those of a privately purchased shirt.   Unless you come up with the proper proof there is no longer a point in continuing.   The posters mind is set the he is right and we are wrong so what’s the point.   If the poster is correct we should be able research this but I’ve googled my face off and can find nothing about any special made shirt.   Show us the military specs for this shirt, you can’t because there aren’t any. We trust military specs not emotional conjecture.   You have to show rock solid proof, find the specs for this shirt and we will believe you   You can’t show anything good luck with your shirt, I’m out.

thank you, Rhscott. I truly appreciate that someone who is a real expert in military logistics, unit histories, and technical equipment details recognizes the significance of this thread.“

Now? No idea.  Point is that it can be done with good results.  This one was done about 10 years ago. Was plated and then duracoated and all that was taken off.

Pretty amazing thread.

Thank you for your info RWW.

Given the significance of this find, I have decided to take a bulletproof approach: The artifact is now being sent for detailed analysis to internationally recognized specialists in forensic textile expertise and early Cold War technology. This analysis will include microscopic examination of the fibers and comparison with the Aero Medical Laboratory project protocols to which these experts have access. In any case, thank you for your expert opinion and it will be my honor to inform you of the result. With respect and best regards, Radim Kurc Pelikán

At this point, it's a professional execution for you, where you want to catch me in the details, unfortunately I know everything about it and once you receive an expert opinion there is nothing to discuss, instead of valuing something that is national history for you, it's already desperation on your part...

If it's a women's shirt, why does it have a men's closure and why does it have an inside pocket for a sensor right above a man's heart and not a women's size? And since when were women's shirts modified in the 1950s with satin in the collar for centrifuge tests?  

This appears to be a woman’s cut shirt, with the waist in it and quarter-panel creases.