😄You guys kill me!

Thanks a bunch. I guess I was lumping all my experiences in on one post. I do understand that Hobby Lobby, Michaels, etc are capable of quality work. I didn't mean to imply deception (when I say rip off). A majority of people will balk at the price of true archival framing so compromises are typically made to keep the cost reasonable. This is a compromise made not just by the framer. Honestly not EVERYTHING has to be archival or upsold to preserve the piece but that's where the education comes in. Upsells like low-glare glass are not my things the farther from the print(more mat layers or even in a shadow box) the glass blurs what I'm looking at. Stuff like that can save money as well without compromising the acid-free part. The prices are still steep IMO so the buyer will still be surprised when years later there is cardboard backing, corners taped, etc found inside. Some will just forego the archival thinking it isn't that complicated. I have seen these things in projects with actual frame shop stickers on the back. The worst one IMO was where the larger print had been cut to fit in the smaller frame. Second would be one where the print was folded back around the edges by 6-8 inches to fit. Again, this may have been a decision made between the framer and customer. My advice would be to find a place, Michaels or wherever, that wants to educate you on the various layers used and the implications of those. Once educated one will understand why the cost(not just price) is rather high. You might find someone who can cut archival mats sourced elsewhere and basically produce a "kit". Still, the way one hangs the print inside is kind of its own thing and type of thin material that one would need to understand. Not hard at all but a little knowledge is needed. Sorry if I went over the top on any specific stores or people there. Dave 

Can you point me to some of those recourses?

SOF magazine. A blast from the past.

Gear I like the bag as well. To me the price on pays and where he gets it is a big tell as to authenticity. Of course that doesn't mean there aren't plenty of tribute pieces that fall into the mix BUT it does mean something was unlikely produced to sell for profit, at least the first time around. This is the danger of all the helmet and uniform "restorations". Sure, many will always appear poorly done but age will eventually make it quite difficult to tell exactly when something was made.   I also noticed the bike frame jig on the floor. Wish I knew you were going to see that before you went! Dave

Screen shot from the TV coverage of last week’s Paris-Roubaix professional cycling race…    

Thanks for your input 👍

Thank you so much. I appreciate you taking your time to look this information up. Jeremiah

Spent the Open Weekend at the Dutch Army Engineer Museum. Reviving our little WW1 living history work group concerning the 32nd US Infantry Division and French 296th Regiment de LIgne.        Results from the Vest Pocket Kodak weren't as good as hoped due to a massive light leak. I should've checked over the camera before using it (just pulled a random one from the pile in the collection)  

It has been awhile since this post was updated. I think fellow historians will find it worth their time to read the story of what one man can accomplish on the battlefield. Best regards  John