Jump to content
  • Current Donation Goals

  • To send a donation, CLICK HERE to go to the DONATE page for options.

  • Recent Posts

    • Kokumaro
      Hello everyone, I’m hoping someone here might recognize this vest or the manufacturer. The tag reads: TEXTILE INDUSTRIES VEST IDENTIFICATION – FLIGHT DECK CREW NSN: 8415-21-852-6557 Size: Medium-Large Date: FEB. 1969 Details: Lightweight blue cotton twill fabric UNITED CARR snap buttons Velcro adjustment on the back No exterior pockets Interior pen pocket and utility pocket No stencil or visible markings I’ve searched online, auction archives, and collector resources but have not been able to find another example made by TEXTILE INDUSTRIES. I’m particularly interested in learning: Was this an officially issued U.S. Navy Flight Deck Crew vest? Has anyone seen another example from TEXTILE INDUSTRIES? Does anyone recognize this NSN or know anything about the manufacturer? Any information or references would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much!
    • Flightwings
      My wing, it's a duplicate.    
    • KurtA
      AI was used to colorize the photo  and it messed up the insignia.    AI does not do well with insignia.  It’s the easiest way to id an AI created/enhanced photo. 
    • skylog6
      I'll look tonight when I get home from work.
    • braxbrad
      can you locate  number 156 name
    • JohnK83882
      The navy hat badge has a slanted N which went out in 1944.
    • manayunkman
      What’s going on?   The US Marine is in the wrong uniform.
    • yokota57
      Small 3"(vertical). "A" for "Asp"? Is it a "Flight" or something else? I've already formed an opinion as to where it was made. Where do you think it was made?
    • Salvage Sailor
      Aloha Graham,   Did you ever receive and find any additional information in his file?   I've been trolling through my PRISIC (JICPOA) photographers mate grouping today and recalled this ancient topic.   Regards   Unpublished JICPOA photographic emblem from my archive  
    • Dragoon
      I would say it is for an 02 and not a 72. The ring mounts are too close together and have no decoration, this is the same for your drag being a different shape to the 1872/1880 sabres and having no decoration, also the throat differs to that on a 72.  The Springfield Armory blade address is that associated with the latter production of the 1872/1880 Field and Cavalry Officers model sabre, it shares the same blade marking as the earliest 1902 sabres.  Hope this helps.
  • * While this forum is partially supported by our advertisers, we make no claim nor endorsement of authenticity of the products which these advertisers sell. If you have an issue with any advertiser, please take it up with them and not with the owner or staff of this forum.

×
×
  • Create New...