-
Current Donation Goals
-
Forum DonationsRaised $2,311 of $7,500 target
-
-
To send a donation, just click on
FORUM DONATIONS in the box above. -
Recent Posts
-
By john k · Posted
Hi, you’re very kind in your words, but I wouldn’t call myself an expert. I’m not aware of one piece Mitchell covers ever being made. That said, there’s a lot of things I don’t know. Let’s see if anyone else can add any more to this conversation? They certainly are others here with far more expertise than myself. -
By OriginalCollector · Posted
Thanks — you clearly know what you're talking about! You don't just copy text things from somewhere else without knowing if they're actually true. Not do you offer irrelevant personal speculations or start off with unnecessary insults. Excellent!!! That’s how things should be around here!!! As an expert worthy of praise, could you please also explain something regarding my second question: Are there any genuine one-piece versions that are printed on both sides? -
By john k · Posted
Pretty easy to see on my desktop screen. Look carefully along the right edge, the stitched seam is visible as a line, and if you look carefully you can see that the camo pattern changes where the two halves come together. (The way it’s laid flat mostly hides this, but look carefully) -
By taps · Posted
Thanks. Only recently discovered Don Ross' memoirs which exactly matched my stepfather father's memories -
By dmar836 · Posted
Naboo, And you received answers and opinions galore yet you keep going. Clearly you disagree (read: politely argue) with the advice given and want to convince members of a different value by now adding new items and "discoveries" along the way. You respond to about any post with, "I don't think you understand..." or "You misunderstand..." Then talk about how incredibly unique and rare your items are. This group is not rare in the context of this forum. We see them all the time. It can become a bit insulting when less experienced members can't even take "yes" for an answer because every comment points to sales potential. Such threads go sour and get closed. Respectfully, if you truly want to discuss the discoveries you are making about the man's record (as you repeatedly claim is your ultimate goal) - great! Then post it in the appropriate forum rather than ringing the "What's it Worth" bell repeatedly. Your motives are clear and you are trying way too hard. Your attempt to sell for $10K gave you away early on. It's already a bit controversial jumping into a post from a brand new member with no other posts as often they just want to "use" member knowledge for their personal gain. This level of debate over a nice grouping, but one of which members have hundreds of, appears to be as much a form of seeking attention as it is to make a big profit. We fell into it as we love this stuff. I think we can smell a like soul and we can smell rhetoric. This has left a bad taste in my mouth and it's always sad when a vet's legacy is moved to the background while a caretaker steps up to "swing for the fence". If anyone had been interested in that grouping, if it were offered at a sane price, your pitch "style" is losing such interest quite quickly. I, too, am out. Dave -
-
By OriginalCollector · Posted
OK, could you please explain in more detail what is visible on the right side of the first picture—specifically, that two different fabrics have been sewn together? As a layperson, all I can see at the seams are frayed fabric edges, so I can't tell whether it's one piece or two. -
By john k · Posted
"I haven't researched it any further than that. Is a Mitchell Cover automatically a Reproduction if it isn't sewn together from two Pieces of fabric, or were there also original One-Piece Versions?" You can clearly see the seam where the two halves are sewn together on the right side of the First picture. I don't see any indications of that cover being a reproduction. -
By manayunkman · Posted
Can someone please post a link to the sale on eBay. I can’t find the listing. I want to know if the new items have been added to it such as the PH. The fact that we haven’t seen pictures of it makes me think that they do not have it. And they must know by now that this isn’t worth $10,000. If this person was so concerned about preserving this man’s story they wouldn’t be selling it but donate it to a museum. They wouldn’t care what its worth either. -
By earlymb · Posted
Hi Ken, this is exactly what I mean with 'automotive parts', that were made for actual use and not just to look correct. Since I was at it, I did some research on what Bosch condenser(s) would fit in a jeep distributor. Since a condenser doesn't care about voltage, the only requirements are capacity (.18 to .26 micro farad) and physical size. It turns out there are several types of Bosch condensers that fit the bill with a capacity of .21 micro farad and since these were commonly installed by Volkswagen in the 1960-70's, NOS examples are easily available. The downside is that the mounting tabs are usually different and will have be altered or replaced, which shouldn't be too hard to do. I see condensers of unknown origin and quality being offered by various jeep parts suppliers for around €8 to €10, while these Bosch condensers seem to cost around €12-€14. I have found the following Bosch condensers that should be suitable for the standard Autolite ICG-4705 and IAD-4008 distributors used by MB/GPW jeeps: Bosch 1 237 330 347 Bosch 1 237 330 316 Bosch 1 237 330 284 Bosch 1 237 330 096 All of these are 18 mm diameter × 25 mm body height and have a capacity of 0.21 micro farad. This was just an example, there are more vintage good quality condensers from other makers that will fit and reliably work just fine with jeeps. Even WW2 NOS ones can still be found but are priced a lot higher.
-
-
-
* While this forum is partially supported by our advertisers, we make no claim nor endorsement of authenticity of the products which these advertisers sell. If you have an issue with any advertiser, please take it up with them and not with the owner or staff of this forum.
