-
Current Donation Goals
-
Forum DonationsRaised $2,241 of $7,500 target
-
-
To send a donation, just click on
FORUM DONATIONS in the box above. -
Recent Posts
-
-
By doyler · Posted
There are several manufacturers on FaceBook that offer to make patches of all types even the rubberized stuff. I have a board of bullion patches a military shop had on display and the owner had the patches made in the early 1990s for resale in his shop. I recall he said he had to do an order of 10 each. I also had 6-10 34th Infantry Division bullion patches that were larger blazer style patches done for WW2 34th vets and was told 30 or less were made for them early1990s. Also spoke to a buyer for a insignia company and at that time he stated all the bullion insignia, wings and badges were sourced overseas. -
By Flukaveli · Posted
Hello, I was wondering how much this helmet would be worth. It is a fixed bale front seam helmet. The heat-stamp is 270B and with last pattern chinstraps. The helmet came with a woodland camo helmet cover. It has a Vietnam liner made by Westling House with 107 stamped right above it. The sweatband is dated 88’. The helmet has been named 4 different times, with the names R.D Holt, Plamondon, V.G. Burns and Andrew H. Thank you for help. -
By BC312 · Posted
I was wondering how deck jackets were marked up for use on the PT boats during WW2. I read that these jacket were issued differently to those on board ships and aircraft carriers in that such jackets were accountable as ship stock and issued when working in the cold on deck and marked accordingly to working areas of the ship. With smaller PT boats there was no room to store such clothing and individually issued for the type of working environment which PT boats were exposed too. I was told that a patch of cloth or Disney style patch usually featuring a character on a torpedo was on the right of the coat or similar art work was on the back of the jacket with name of crew either on front above USN logo on left or on back with hull number ie PT102 and boat squadron, not in any order but marked up on the lines inspired by the airforce and using paint to hand either with cut stencils or by hand. Not sure if this is correct as it would be nice to see the type clothing used on PT boats not just the Pacific but in the ETO as well were it could be colder. Any reference books about on such a subject or photos. -
By everythingmiliary · Posted
Nope, he went to John Carroll University. Hayden -
-
By dmar836 · Posted
I agree with all the above. I collect only AAF but the line where a "grouping" becomes anything more than interesting story to only one man compared to historic value is pretty thin for me. Period engraved medals and uniform items are an example. Now, once you have a patched and painted A-2 jacket or other display items, collectors would pay a premium (historic value or not). A primarily paper lot is interesting to see the older type of paper, type print, and vintage paper clips and staples. The actual info on them tends to be fairly standard to all such papers and is available from online records, NARA, etc. I love having complete groupings (though much of my collection is not that at all) but I ask myself and also observe "What am I able to appropriately display?" and "What will people actually stop and look at?" Most people are not at all impressed at an original pay journal that the vet actually held and signed and more than a photocopy of a page. Consequently, the uniforms are displayed and appreciated and the paperwork and pic stay in folders in a closet. To a medal collector, the signed medals may be of display interest while the uniform items, pics, and documents would need to be stored elsewhere. Also, remember "historical" significance means it's just old. "Historic" significance refers to its importance in history. That's where the value part starts to bifurcate IMO. To most of us this is all very important but to an archive that has tons of similar stories and artifacts it is just more of the same "historical" items. What original papers in a grouping say to me is this isn't a few items that has passed from person to person with some photocopies of the vet's records but rather something that has been kept complete directly from the vet or his family. That is a different grouping. Same info but different for sure. Very nice stuff. JMO, Dave -
-
-
By Naboo29 · Posted
Thank you for the comments. I may not have done the best job showing everything in the initial photos. While there is some supporting research included, the majority of the archive consists of original wartime material retained by the family, including original correspondence, photographs, award-related documents, casualty paperwork, press material, and other period documents. I’ll try to post additional images of some of the original documents so the scope of the archive is clearer.
-
-
-
* While this forum is partially supported by our advertisers, we make no claim nor endorsement of authenticity of the products which these advertisers sell. If you have an issue with any advertiser, please take it up with them and not with the owner or staff of this forum.
