Thanks all!!

Great finds. That sign is fantastic! 

Read the description and title. They both pretty accurately describe what they are. You seem to not be able to do that as this is the second eBay post where you haven’t read the description. It’s there for a reason.

So, after relooking at my M-51 and your pics you can clearly see it has been worn. It's a context thing. This is beating a dead horse but if not here, where?   Here is an even more worn M-43(no cuff or edge fraying at all [but from two wars earlier] - just dirt and fading) on top of an "NOS" M-1951:   They fade pretty well. Here are some close ups of the M-51. There is zero rubbing on the edges of the pockets, under the flaps, or most easily noted, the wrinkles around seams. There is a yellowness to the lighting that is a bit confusing but you get it.       If you take the waist string on yours and straighten the fold, can you see "whiskering"? Here's a before and after stretching the string pocket - no wear:     Finally, you asked about provenance. I have none but on NOS or "dead stock" you should see evidence of manufacture - crisp edges, overstitching, some extra threads, etc.       If the horse isn't dead yet and at risk of being called pedantic I would confidently call this M-51 a NOS, "dead stock" field jacket. You have a very nice jacket indeed but it is clearly not "dead stock". Opinion? Sure, but this one still has tailors chalk markings. Shell:      Lining:   Apologies as I now feel a little foolish. I see you have posted only this one topic and likely aren't interested in the details of militaria. Hopefully you are but if here only for evaluation or selling opportunities, you are now better equipped about what you have and what is actually out there. Hopefully you won't be the guy posting ads saying "like new" or "NOS". It's a good example but..... Best, Dave 

DA ( Defense Agency ) 1953-1961 

Sure, I'd like to see how it looks. Although mine isn't woodland camo.    The one I've got is same as this one, but used and a little damaged. 

These links seem very helpful and something I will use in the future. And I agree, Egedius is one of the most unique names I've heard from things I've had. The last name "Knudsen" is fairly common however, but Egedius is not.  Due to my family being previous and current curators we're big on research, history, and archival so we have a subscription to Ancestry, Fold3, etc.  But again, I will definitely be saving the links you've attached for my use in research. So thank you very much for the help you've given me over Egedius Knudsen. The research will continue!   Thanks, Hayden

Here's the up-close shot of the uniform with the cursive name tape.

I see nothing that concerns me.  Nice rifle.