Jump to content
  • Current Donation Goals

  • To send a donation, just click on
    FORUM DONATIONS in the box above.

  • Recent Posts

    • aznation
      Welcome back to the forum Vincent and just so you know that's a really great photograph of you.  You look like you could've been there during WWII.  If I were a casting director (which I'm not) you'd be my first pick for a War Correspondent.  Awesome!  Also, thank you for participating in the Normandy celebrations.
    • Saedeleerken
      Hi all,   My name is Vincent De Saedeleer from belgium. I use to have an account here, but unfortunatly, did not know my password anymore and don't use my old emailadress too. So I figured I'll just create a new account here.   My main intrest is 104th ID and War Correspondents during ww2. I also do re-enactments of US WWI and WWII troops. some may know my group: Timberwolves Remembrance Group Belgium. included is a picture of me at this years Normandy celebrations.   Kind Regards, Vincent
    • dmar836
      Very nice. I wish the 8th crewmember tunic could talk! Dave
    • McLenn2025
      There is a separate thread  by the poor soul, who bought this jacket. According to vintageproductions and kammoman, it is fake (done by an apparently well-known faker). Nothing new obviously, but I am always sad to see, that people get ripped off like that...
    • dmar836
    • USMCR79
      I thought there was a regulation on this. Thanks for refreshing my memory.
    • USMCR79
      I think "The Honker" received the Bronze Star Medal at some point in WWII, After 1944.
    • Josh B.
      Ok, these photos look "better" in that they appear die-struck and not cast.   As for assigning a particular manufacturing date range, that is going to be more difficult.  What we believe is the original "male" or reverse die for these pins had the "Gemsco" and "Sterling" as features of the die.  From comparing many photographed examples, the male die appears to have suffered damage rather early in its use, leading to common damage in the "Sterling" area of the die.    I'm not surprised by this damage...these GEMSCO deepwave dolphins have exceptionally high detail/relief, and the amount of force on the male die needed to achieve that relief must have been quite substantial.  To make up for the loss of the "Sterling" mark on the male die, the sterling badges were then individually counterstruck with a smaller "STERLING +1/20 10K GF" mark for metal content.   Against that background,  I believe your pin is not from the earliest runs of the insignia.  The pin does not appear to be sterling, and the male die used is either a completely different one from that used to make the sterling examples, or the "Sterling" mark had completely degraded from the stamping surface by the time it was used here.  I point out that the Gemsco mark itself is fairly weak, but the telltale stress lines in the metal left by the male die, and are found on sterling examples too, are in your pin.  Your pin-hinge hardware is also different from what I usually see on the sterling badges too.  So from what I can see, your pin likely isn't a reproduction per se, but I personally wouldn't place it alongside the standard Sterling examples (which I attribute to late WWII to Korean War era) in terms of timeline.  As I wrote above, the back-die details and hardware appear "later" to me.     Footnote: I've seen very few, if any, clear images of GEMSCO Deepwave dolphins in wartime uniform photos.  To a trained eye, they are easy to pick out compared to the similar-but-distinct H-H deepwave dolphins: the latter being quite commonly worn during the period.  But GEMSCO submarine patrol pins also show up in wartime groupings far less than H-H, AMICO, and Blackinton too.  So this may be a reflection of GEMSCO having much smaller submarine insignia market share during the period. Or alternatively, perhaps GEMSCO diluted their own market for their heavy sterling deepwave pins to some degree, by virtue of the company also producing other distinctly-designed (and perhaps cheaper) officer's dolphins during the war.  That said, the expensive construction and finish of the sterling GEMSCO deepwave pins places them in the WWII-Korean era; by the late 50 to early 60's, submarine dolphins became much less detailed across manufacturers and look "cheap" compared to 40's and earlier examples that have a more jewelry-like quality.
    • Johan Willaert
      I met up with Ron Fitzpatrick from G503 at Grandcamp on Sunday. Ron is the creator of the G503 forum, G503 Jeep Parts and the G503 Facebook page and has thus created a worldwide community of Jeep owners... G503 was the US Government's vehicle model number attributed to the Jeep    
    • Johan Willaert
      Joe's Motor Pool, a British based manufacturer and dealer of Jeep parts, brought several rarities to its Normandy HQ at Hiesville. There was a line-up of different Jeep prototypes, including a Willys MA ( I spotted a second Luxemburg owned one on the road ), a Bantam BRC40 and two 4-wheel steer Ford GPs..., along with a GPA amphibian.... Also they brought a very early production Ford GPW in unrestored condition.... All of these were driven to France from England...    
  • * While this forum is partially supported by our advertisers, we make no claim nor endorsement of authenticity of the products which these advertisers sell. If you have an issue with any advertiser, please take it up with them and not with the owner or staff of this forum.

×
×
  • Create New...