Jump to content
  • Thank You for Supporting USMF

  • To send a donation, just click on
    FORUM DONATIONS in the box above.

  • Recent Posts

    • dukmann
      Sure, I'd like to see how it looks. Although mine isn't woodland camo.    The one I've got is same as this one, but used and a little damaged. 
    • Allan H.
    • everythingmiliary
      These links seem very helpful and something I will use in the future. And I agree, Egedius is one of the most unique names I've heard from things I've had. The last name "Knudsen" is fairly common however, but Egedius is not.  Due to my family being previous and current curators we're big on research, history, and archival so we have a subscription to Ancestry, Fold3, etc.  But again, I will definitely be saving the links you've attached for my use in research. So thank you very much for the help you've given me over Egedius Knudsen. The research will continue!   Thanks, Hayden
    • Capt.Confederacy
      Here's the up-close shot of the uniform with the cursive name tape.
    • Rhscott
      I see nothing that concerns me.  Nice rifle.
    • Horseclover
      I'm not sure what to say, I may be in love but it was probably too many gin fizzes   https://www.ebay.com/itm/287260756471?   New Colt V-42 Devils Brigade Fixed Blade D Guard Knife & Sheath CT535 440 SS          
    • Allan H.
      $100 USD? You could probably buy the same pieces at a large US militaria show for about half that. You can still find mint, unissued Bronze Stars in the cardboard shipping boxes for less than $20 each. The pendant by itself? Maybe a $5 item. The Silver Star appears to be unnumbered. While it is WWII manufacture, you will probably see these in the $50 range at shows and they don't go flying out of the cases at those prices.   Allan
    • dmar836
      Cool. Not throwing stones. The only "provenance" I can think of is garments containing cutter tags. If they are still on the garment, it was most certainly not issue-worn or worn out that way. Not sure if I've seen VN era garments with those but it was common in WWII. Pic indeed can be deceiving. The jacket appears a bit faded to me but it may be the lighting. If actually unworn I assume it hasn't been handled so much that the wrinkles at the drawstring show fading. Again, like the snaps, maybe it's just the lighting. Few of us have handled an actual NOS jacket like this(not that it is uber rare). They are quite dark and a bit stiff when new and fade to a happy point pretty quickly. Is that a pic of the hood?  You could make some comparisons with the hood, under the pocket flaps, etc. Those will often show the overall wear but if laundered even once those areas fade as well.  When I return from the gym, I'll post some pics of an M-51 and an M-43 and we can compare notes. I'm not trying to knock down - this is what the hobby is often about and is fun and educational for all if we have an open mind. Dave
    • Marshallj
      When I was a kid they were called Converse All Stars. The “Chuck Taylor” moniker has been added with the rebirth of the brand. 
    • Johan Willaert
      Two decades separate these three books… 1984-1994-2004    
  • * While this forum is partially supported by our advertisers, we make no claim nor endorsement of authenticity of the products which these advertisers sell. If you have an issue with any advertiser, please take it up with them and not with the owner or staff of this forum.

×
×
  • Create New...