GMCollection Posted June 8, 2023 Share #1 Posted June 8, 2023 Hi, I have these 2 UFH bayonets, they are not cut down M1905s, nor standard M1s. One with date 1943, the other without. With the date they seem common, but the other less so. Would you have any information on these 2 bayonets? Thanks, Gilles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byf41 Posted June 8, 2023 Share #2 Posted June 8, 2023 Those are both cut down versions , very common bayonets . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMCollection Posted June 8, 2023 Author Share #3 Posted June 8, 2023 Thank you for your reply. The cut down bayonets M1905 that I usually find of WWII origin in France : 1°) Are dated 2°) Are usually marked on the ricasso or on the back handle by UFH, AFH, OL, PAL or UC 3¨) The blade is different (the picture) 1 of the 2 has none of these characteristics ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misfit 45 Posted June 9, 2023 Share #4 Posted June 9, 2023 Gilles. Your UFH M1 was in Union Fork and Hoe inventory as an M1905 blank. The fuller was not yet fully formed. The blank was cut down to make the M1. They finished the fuller to within 2 inches from the tip as with all M1 bayonets. That's why the fuller does not extend all the way through the tip as other cut down M1s. Marv Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMCollection Posted June 9, 2023 Author Share #5 Posted June 9, 2023 Marv, Thank you very much for this detailed explanation. It is for this reason that we find the 2nd with the same cutting process without the date because it is the marking of the M1. My 2 bayonets have never left UFH company with 16-inch blades. Were they completed when the M1s were manufactured or when the shortening of the M1905s began? Gilles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misfit 45 Posted June 9, 2023 Share #6 Posted June 9, 2023 The shortening process was done during the same time as the manufacture of the new M1s. Marv Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMCollection Posted June 9, 2023 Author Share #7 Posted June 9, 2023 OK, Last question, so they are with M7 scabbards and not cut down M3. Mine were with M7. Gilles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKIPH Posted June 9, 2023 Share #8 Posted June 9, 2023 GMCollection- As far as scabbards go, I doubt the war effort was concerned whether the shortened bayonets were paired w/ new M7s, or shortened M3s. What ever was available was used. SKIP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMCollection Posted June 9, 2023 Author Share #9 Posted June 9, 2023 Thanks SKIP , indeed. Very often, on "field" bayonets, cut down M1s are with cut down M3s, M1s with M7s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKIPH Posted June 9, 2023 Share #10 Posted June 9, 2023 Not disagreeing at all, I have a mixed bag on all my scabbards. Some M1s with cut down M3s, some cut down bayonets with M7s. Lots of opportunities for switching around over the last 81years. Units, collectors, surplus dealers etc. SKIP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hyrax222 Posted June 10, 2023 Share #11 Posted June 10, 2023 GMCollection- Shortening of M1905 bayonets didnt get rolling until sufficient numbers were retreived and collected to keep crews engaged until around Sept. 1943. Mods continued sporaticly until Aug. 8, 1945. The wars end probably saved a few M1905's from the ax. hyrax222 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now