March 13, 20242 yr #1 Hello Got this nice flag officer tunic for a rear admiral Notice the Navy Cross and the Grand officer of the Légion d'Honneur Unamed And with former ennemy Thanks for looking Louis.
March 13, 20242 yr #2 The first ribbon bar is for the Navy Distinguished Service Medal. The Navy Cross has a white center stripe.
March 13, 20242 yr Author #3 1 hour ago, atb said: The first ribbon bar is for the Navy Distinguished Service Medal. The Navy Cross has a white center stripe. Hello Apologies for the miss identification ! Still a hight hand award for our Amiral 👍 Louis
March 13, 20242 yr #4 A very cool and rare piece. I've never seen a flag rank khaki blouse with the black sleeve rank trim. Great find!! Steve
March 13, 20242 yr Author #5 8 hours ago, themick said: A very cool and rare piece. I've never seen a flag rank khaki blouse with the black sleeve rank trim. Great find!! Steve Thanks ! This one is part of 1922 - 1941 US NAVY regulations Quote On 22 June 1924, the Chief of the Bureau of Aeronautics directed a letter to the Secretary of the Navy strongly recommending the authorization of a kahki uniform for summer wear and a heavier one for cold weather. He suggested that such a uniform could be used to advantage by all officers whose duties involved working with machinery. This idea became a reality just prior to World War II! A working dress was authorized on 8 April 1925 for “Naval Aviators, Observers and Other Officers detailed to duty involving flying.” The newly authorized coat was not like that of the recent war but a modification of the new service blue sack coat. The self-belted, single-breasted khaki coat was fastened with three bronzed buttons, had a rolling collar, notched lapels, a pocket on either breast and two lower bellows pockets See more there https://www.history.navy.mil/browse-by-topic/heritage/uniforms-and-personal-equipment/uniforms-1922-1931.html After the 1941 regulation, all flag ranks where on shoulders Thanks Louis.
March 13, 20242 yr #6 This raises some real questions for me. The pre-1941 khakis were all cotton twill, this looks like wool or a blend. As a "wash" item, the coat used removable wings, ribbons and buttons so they didn't have to be re-sewn. Are the black stars on a wool backing? The pre-WW2 khaki coat had bellows-style lower pockets; they were not changed to the flat patch style until 1947-48, around the same time that wool khakis—which became an option during the war—became "service dress" rather than "working." The shoulder loops are unusual, too. They were usually long enough to be covered by the collar, and pointed, not blunt on the end.
March 13, 20242 yr Author #7 Hello Justin Some more pictures Pocket tissu, for me it's not wool Star, on a cotton backing Wool based wing Behind of it Interior of the coat And Shoulder board Louis.
March 13, 20242 yr #8 The buttons appear to have right facing eagles dating them to after 14 May 1941. Is the coat named?
March 13, 20242 yr Author #9 13 minutes ago, FlyNavy02 said: The buttons appear to have right facing eagles dating them to after 14 May 1941. Is the coat named? I forgot a picture of the buttons Coat unamed, I have only a tailor label But , as I may be wrong with the date, I don't think for a "all put together"
March 13, 20242 yr #10 The uniform is of superb quality and made by a tailor who was known for making high end uniforms for higher ranking officers. As far as not being of the more low grade materials of a typical khaki uniform, if anyone would deviate from this (and be permitted to do so), it would be an admiral. Those post 1941 buttons initially struck me as being impossible. But, I note this style khaki uniform with sleeve rank was replaced in 1941 with a khaki uniform with shoulder board rank. 1941 was the same year the eagle head direction on the buttons changed. Could this uniform been made in a very small window in 1941 where a (pre ordered) old style uniform was matched up with new style buttons? I think somehow, this uniform is correct and legit.
March 13, 20242 yr #11 I'd have to think given the combination that this uniform would be fairly simple to ID?
March 13, 20242 yr #12 16 minutes ago, History Man said: I'd have to think given the combination that this uniform would be fairly simple to ID? Agree - some characteristics really limit the field of possibilities: 1. Spanish American War service (noted the ribbons are out of order) 2. Naval Aviator 3. Still serving 40 some years later in 1941 4. DSM 5. Looks like a French Legion of Honor ribbon?
March 13, 20242 yr #13 I look at things as "wrong" until I can explain them and gain comfort with it. In this case, to me this looks like a 1940s or 50s (or later?) Navy officer's khaki uniform jacket that someone sewed cuff rank on. I have yet to convince myself otherwise. Can anyone point out where this jacket (sans insignia) is different than any other kahki uniform jacket? Happy to be wrong. Tagging @KASTAUFFER as he knows these pretty well.
March 13, 20242 yr Author #14 Hello More pictures of how the uniform is designed Arm rank Interior Pocket tab I did notice there was a name but was rip off Thanks for helping me on this About the Legion d'Honneur it's the Grand officier rank (a really strong one considering of the last LH Rank is Grand Croix) You will notice the gold part of the ruban, indicating the rank Louis.
March 13, 20242 yr #17 Looking at the uniform and comparing it to the few photos of real ones, I'm not seeing anything that couldn't have been put together by someone. The cuff rank is easy enough to buy and sew on, the ribbons are easy to create and sew on, and the wings are available...and again, easy enough to sew on. Thus far, I'm not seeing anything that's "this HAS to be a 1930's khaki" uniform. Again, happy to be wrong if something is obvious that I'm missing.
March 13, 20242 yr #18 Sorry, this just does not look like a pre-WW2 working khaki coat. The buttons were changed from bronze to gold in April '41, before the new Uniform Regulations were published in June with the eagle direction change, so there would be no reason to put new-style bronze buttons on a khaki coat. The pre-WW2 navy khakis were very much thought of as a hands-on working uniform, meant to go through the ship's laundry. The lightweight tropical wools (Palm Beach, TW etc.) were expensive and would be very unlikely for a working uniform at that time. I have never seen a period photo of pre-WW2 or WW2 working khakis with embroidered wings. It was non-regulation, and it was impractical as well. Louis, are there any traces of former shoulder board attachment loops under the shoulder straps? 41 minutes ago, KurtA said: Agree - some characteristics really limit the field of possibilities: Take your pick: Ernest King Charles Blakely That's all I can come up with, 1941-1942 flag NAs with DSM. And King would have a gold star for a second DSM.
March 13, 20242 yr #20 24 minutes ago, Dave said: I look at things as "wrong" until I can explain them and gain comfort with it. In this case, to me this looks like a 1940s or 50s (or later?) Navy officer's khaki uniform jacket that someone sewed cuff rank on. I have yet to convince myself otherwise. Can anyone point out where this jacket (sans insignia) is different than any other kahki uniform jacket? Happy to be wrong. Tagging @KASTAUFFER as he knows these pretty well. Hmmmm. Good point, Dave. I think the key is analyzing those shoulder straps. In the one photo you can see some stitches/threads at the base of the strap. I looked at a number of other various uniforms I have. Stitching / threads were not visible. So, that’s not good. Possibly added later. The eyelets (opening for the button) on the straps should be compared to those on the pockets and down the front. I would think the stitching should all be identical. The one component not easily available would be the line officer stars. Can’t think of any other uniform that would have these. Would have to be manufactured.
March 13, 20242 yr #21 I'm seeing some very rough hand stitching on the shoulder straps. Also, the backing of the shoulder straps doesn't match the lining of the jacket...something you wouldn't see on a jacket from a high-end tailor. Keep in mind these were sold without shoulder strap loops when Chief Petty Officers were authorized to wear the uniform, so missing the loops isn't a tell-tale sign.
March 13, 20242 yr Author #22 You are right, that's not how a Hight end tailor would present the uniform. Here is a picture of tunic button holes VS tunic button stars Well that one of a kind to have faked this one I'm mainly on French Generals and I will keept on it ! :) (Or just US army generals) Tunic was brought from James Military Antiques (JMA) Louis.
March 13, 20242 yr #23 It all appears to me to be too crude in workmanship, especially for a RAdm. Looks to me like someone doctored a late 1940's CPO blouse.
March 13, 20242 yr Author #24 2 minutes ago, R Leonard said: It all appears to me to be too crude in workmanship, especially for a RAdm. Looks to me like someone doctored a late 1940's CPO blouse. When looking at the internet : https://wow.uscgaux.info/content.php?unit=A-DEPT&category=uniform-1950-1 With different shoulders and pockets flaps and you got it (I should have know this forum before the fatal act 🤕, but we cannot fight from all fronts ! ) At least , my other general is good 😁 https://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/index.php?/topic/394282-grouping-of-m-g-thomas-dewees-finley-commanding-officer-89th-id-ww2/ Louis.
March 13, 20242 yr #25 The shoulder strap eyelets being so different seal the deal for me - uniform is a rather well done fake.
Create an account or sign in to comment