Jump to content
RelicHunter99

Safe to assume WW1 Machine Gunner would carry pistol?

Recommended Posts

I would say that's a pretty reasonable assumption. Even BAR gunners were provided with a special BAR ammo belts with an integral pistol mag pouch because they were armed with .45s.

 

Sabrejet


"We shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender!"

 

Winston Churchill

" Life is what happens to you when you're busy making other plans."

John Winston Lennon

 

 

donation2010.gif

donation2011.gifdonation2012.gifdonation2013.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bonjour.

 

The Gunners had the gun cal.45

 

 

above: BAR

 

below:shosho

 

224.jpg

 

regards solcarlus.

post-241-1295211954.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wouldn't a machine gunner were a pistol belt?

 

 

I would guess either a pistol belt or a rifle belt depending on if he also had a rifle to use or an assitant gunner??

 

RD


In Memoriam:
Lieutenant J.Kostelec 1-3 First Special Service Force MIA/PD 4 March 1944 Italy
I HAVE SEEN THE ENEMY AND IT IS DAYLIGHT
Forget about the tips..We'll get hell to pay (AC/DC)
"If you cant get out and run with the big dogs then sit on the porch and bark at the cars going by.."

Have you Hugged a Clown Today?

You Cant Get A Sun Tan On The Moon..





Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My grandfather was a machine gunner in the 10th FA, 3rd Div AEF 1917-1919. About 40 years ago before he passed We spoke of WWI and his armament. As a machine gunner he wore a regular pistol belt (I remember because I specifically asked him) with no integral ammo pouches. He had a single double magazine pouch for his M1911 Colt automatic pistol, which he wore on the left front of his belt.

 

In my experience in the military there is the regulation way and the way it was done in the field and in combat. Now is he a typical example of machine gunner, or an atypical example?

 

I know he was atypical in at least one way. In addition to his issued M1911, he also "found" a M1917 revolver with holster and he added that to his belt wearing it on the left. He said the butt of the revolver was to the rear on that holster when on the left side.

 

He was a two gun gunner from Iowa!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the gunner his primary weapon would have been the machine gun and he would have been issued the pistol as a personal defense weapon if the MG becomes unusable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.