Jump to content
Bank Vault

What is your favorite

Recommended Posts

What is your favorite military long gun and favorite military pistol.

 

I have to say I love the Arisakas and the 1911.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm partial to the M1903 Springfield rifle.


donation2017.gif

donation2016.gifdonation2018.gifdonation2019.gifdonation2020.gif

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

M1 Garand & M1911A1, hands down my favorites. thumbsup.gif

 

On a side note, love the M-60 as my favorite full auto belt fed.

 

Bryan


“There's not much I can tell you about this war. It's like all wars, I guess.The undertakers are winning.The politicians who talk about the glory of it.The old men who talk about the need of it.The soldiers, well, they just wanna go home.” Jimmy Stewart in Shenandoah

 

donation2007.gifdonation2010.gifdonation2011.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Browning M2 .50 machine gun, the M1918 BAR, and the M1911 service pistol are all tied for being my favorites. I've fired all three of them.

 

Greg


Greg Robinson "marine-kabar"

donation2007.gifdonation2008.gifdonation2009.gifdonation2010.gif

**PLEASE NOTE: THIS COMMUNITY MEMBER, SADLY, HAS PASSED AWAY**

http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/index.php?/topic/106069-rip-greg-robinson/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

M1911A1 (I owned and fired a Springfield 45 which is similar) and M1 Garand (fired it too a few times).


704th Tank Destroyer Battalion

 

donation2009.gifdonation2010.gif

donation2011.gifdonation2012.gifdonation2013.gif

donation2014.gifdonation2015.gifdonation2016.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

M16 as used in Vietnam with the original triangular hand guards and three pronged flash hider

 

and the US M1911 / M1911A1 .45 automatic pistols

 

vietnam_1967.jpg

 

Vietnam.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My (First) 1903 Springfield and my( first) M1 Garand I acquired some 35 years ago, when I still was a college boy.

I used to work during 1 full month as a job student in order to be able to pay for it.

Both weapons are , of course, registered and owned according our Belgian laws

6c8kxtd.jpg

T


WOODS NOW U.S MARINE CORPS ENTIRELY, our lines include now the entire Bois de Belleau. Signed, Major Shearer "Skipper" 5Th Marines, 3rd Bat - June 25th 1918

 

donation2008.gifdonation2010.gifdonation2012.gif
donation2014.gifdonation2013.gifdonation2015.gifdonation2016.gif

 

donation2020.gif

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good choices, am I the only Japanese Arisaka fan in here? They are highly under rated in my personal opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good choices, am I the only Japanese Arisaka fan in here? They are highly under rated in my personal opinion.

 

I saw a nice Arisaka with bayonet & scabbard at the gun shop but the mum was ground off, they wanted $300

 

the store owner said it was on consignment, and was told it was brought back after WWII by a vet, he said the USN ship had a whole stack of them and the sailors were allowed to take one home as a souvineer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I saw a nice Arisaka with bayonet & scabbard at the gun shop but the mum was ground off, they wanted $300

 

the store owner said it was on consignment, and was told it was brought back after WWII by a vet, he said the USN ship had a whole stack of them and the sailors were allowed to take one home as a souvineer

 

That is a good price if all the numbers match. Mine, for a half shot out military rifle, is a tack driver. Very under rated for sure

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love my Garand. :D (Running a close 2nd is the 98k). Pistol wise, the 1911 is a classic.

 

***Me and my Garand (slung) on our first hunting trip***

 

post-1304-1189468780.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two garand clips, how many deer did you plan on killing? Just kidding. I myself hunt elk with my 30-06, I have a picture of one in my profile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good choices, am I the only Japanese Arisaka fan in here? They are highly under rated in my personal opinion.

 

 

I have an Arisaka Type 99, toyo kogyo arsenal, with the Chrysanthemum ground off. Looking for a bayonet for it that isn't wildly overpriced (seen them for $175 and up...is this what they actually sell for, or just over-ambitious sellers? Anyway, the Arisaka is definitely a decent bolt-action, worthy of praise. Not quite a 1903 or a M1 Carbine though!


donation2008.gifdonation2009.gifdonation2010.gif

donation2011.gifdonation2012.gifdonation2013.gifdonation2014.gifdonation2015.gif

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have an Arisaka Type 99, toyo kogyo arsenal, with the Chrysanthemum ground off. Looking for a bayonet for it that isn't wildly overpriced (seen them for $175 and up...is this what they actually sell for, or just over-ambitious sellers? Anyway, the Arisaka is definitely a decent bolt-action, worthy of praise. Not quite a 1903 or a M1 Carbine though!

 

Arisaka bayonets with scabbard usually sell for around $75 and up, you should be able to find a decent bayonet for under $100

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
M1 Garand & M1911A1, hands down my favorites. thumbsup.gif

 

On a side note, love the M-60 as my favorite full auto belt fed.

 

Bryan

 

 

I have ro agreem with this.

My shooting Garand is a long range match winner in local events.

I have used a m1911 based comp-gun for over 15 years...it has always functioned not matter what I would do with it.

Without doubt...two of the most relaible firearms around are th M-1 Garand and the M1911 45 acp.

Cheers


Curator/Owner Ghost Squadron Military Museum,

Curator, South Alberta Light Horse Regimental Museum

Collector of;
U.S. Infantry, uniforms, and equipment, 1860 to 1950, Primarily the 41st and 88th Infantry Divisions of WW1 and WW2, United States Army Air Force, Anything B-17 Flying Fortress related, National Guard of Pennsylvania, Royal Canadian Air Force, 4th Canadian Armored division. Springfield Armory firearms, U.S. military firearms in general.



donation2012.gifdonation2013.gifdonation2014.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I rather prefer the Stoner weapon system that we field tested in Vietnam. It fired the same round as the M-16 except that it didn't jam like the 16. Further, from one basic receiver group we could make any number of weapons by swapping barrells, stocks, feed cover, and pistol grip, etc. It had great utility. On one patrol our guy carrying the Stoner belt-fed MG was shot in the hand. The bullet tool off his finger and the trigger of the gun. As I remember, we took the pistol grip assembly from one of the Stoner rifles, and swapped it for the damaged one on the M-G and we had a functioning M-G again. The picture below was taken on Hill 452 with Rodriguez at left, "Gator" Thielen holding one of the Stoner rifles, Bell, Triana, and just the top of my head behind Triana. By the way....there was comment about "duck hunter" camo in a uniform thread. Here you see Triana wearing the trousers of his set while Roddy and Gator are wearing the tiger stripes and Bell is wearing standard jungle utilities.

 

I used my Sig .45 in the Gulf War and Somalia and am sold on it. The Gov't. Model Colt was OK Beyond the benefit of double-action which allowed it to be carried safely with a round in the chamber and not worry about the safety and an extra round in the mag over the Government Model Colt (which I carried in Vietnam), it feels good in my hand and is a good "point & shoot piece. I also like the knock-down power of the .45 over the 9mm. It may not always kill but every time I hit an enemy with it, the .45 stopped him in his tracks (both with the Gov't. Model and the Sig.

 

post-1107-1189775593.jpg


Semper fi; Bill











donation2008.gifdonation2009.gifdonation2010.gifdonation2011.gif
donation2012.gifdonation2013.gifdonation2014.gifdonation2015.gifdonation2016.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I rather prefer the Stoner weapon system that we field tested in Vietnam. It fired the same round as the M-16 except that it didn't jam like the 16. Further, from one basic receiver group we could make any number of weapons by swapping barrells, stocks, feed cover, and pistol grip, etc. It had great utility. On one patrol our guy carrying the Stoner belt-fed MG was shot in the hand. The bullet tool off his finger and the trigger of the gun. As I remember, we took the pistol grip assembly from one of the Stoner rifles, and swapped it for the damaged one on the M-G and we had a functioning M-G again. The picture below was taken on Hill 452 with Rodriguez at left, "Gator" Thielen holding one of the Stoner rifles, Bell, Triana, and just the top of my head behind Triana. By the way....there was comment about "duck hunter" camo in a uniform thread. Here you see Triana wearing the trousers of his set while Roddy and Gator are wearing the tiger stripes and Bell is wearing standard jungle utilities.

 

I used my Sig .45 in the Gulf War and Somalia and am sold on it. The Gov't. Model Colt was OK Beyond the benefit of double-action which allowed it to be carried safely with a round in the chamber and not worry about the safety and an extra round in the mag over the Government Model Colt (which I carried in Vietnam), it feels good in my hand and is a good "point & shoot piece. I also like the knock-down power of the .45 over the 9mm. It may not always kill but every time I hit an enemy with it, the .45 stopped him in his tracks (both with the Gov't. Model and the Sig.

 

Yep....it was a shame that the Stoner system was never given a fair chace due to political considerations. It was well thought of by Marines during the '60's although they were never allowed to offically use it. I talked to a SEAL team member who carried the Stoner system in Viet Nam and he raved about the weapon.

 

I also agree re the SIG SAUER .45. As much as I love the old 1911/1911A1's I'd rate the SIG as second best. Only reservation I'd have re carrying it in combat would be reliability. How does it function once it gets a little mud in it?

 

Greg


Greg Robinson "marine-kabar"

donation2007.gifdonation2008.gifdonation2009.gifdonation2010.gif

**PLEASE NOTE: THIS COMMUNITY MEMBER, SADLY, HAS PASSED AWAY**

http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/index.php?/topic/106069-rip-greg-robinson/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're talking about weapoons other than rifles and pistols, I carried the M-60 for many months after they forced us to return the Stoners. The "pig" itself was heavy as was the ammo, but it always fired when called upon and the 7.62 round was poweful enough to chop a small tree down. While the ammo was heavy, none of the other patrol members ever griped when I passed out extra belts for them to carry.

 

The Ithaca 12ga shotgun I carried as a patrol leader was a great ambush-breaker, particularly when loaded with flechette rounds. The only drawback was it was particuarly less effective beyond about 30 yards or so in the jungle but close-in was where most of our combat action took place anyway.

 

post-1107-1189777213.jpg

 

post-1107-1189777260.jpg


Semper fi; Bill











donation2008.gifdonation2009.gifdonation2010.gifdonation2011.gif
donation2012.gifdonation2013.gifdonation2014.gifdonation2015.gifdonation2016.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yep....it was a shame that the Stoner system was never given a fair chace due to political considerations. It was well thought of by Marines during the '60's although they were never allowed to offically use it. I talked to a SEAL team member who carried the Stoner system in Viet Nam and he raved about the weapon.

 

I also agree re the SIG SAUER .45. As much as I love the old 1911/1911A1's I'd rate the SIG as second best. Only reservation I'd have re carrying it in combat would be reliability. How does it function once it gets a little mud in it?

 

Greg

 

We kept our Stoners well beyond the required turn-in date. Our Bn. Commander supported us and I understood that it took a direct order from MG Robertson before the Bn commander finally directed that they be turned in. Even after than, we still kept the belt-fed Stoner for another month or so. Below is a picture of Gertie Gugich and another of our Stoners, this one leaning against a rock alongside one of our M-14s (I find very little fault with the M-14 as well thumbsup.gif ). It's too bad Stoner Arms didn't have the money to spread around that Colt Industries had. In the time we used the Stoner, I don't recall one malfunction. In that same period of time, I could fill a book with the number of M-16 malfunctions.

 

I don't mean to get off the subject but I will make a couple comments about our experience with reliability of the M-16. When we were circling the LZ on final approach, I always had my Recon Marines carrying the M-16 assemble their cleaning rod and slide it down between their back and their rucksack so it would be handy to knock out the inevitable jammed cartridges. Many of our Marines carried AKs, grease guns, and all sorts of unauthorized weapons to the field. I remember in late summer of 67 (after the Bn Cdr took the heat on the Stoners) we were ordered to taker the M-16 to the field. Two of our guys compiled by breaking them down and shoving them in their rucksacks and they then carried an AK and grease gun respectively as their primary weapon. We had almost NO confidence in the M-16. :unsure:

 

OK, back on the topic of the thread and to your question about reliability: I don't know how the Sig would function in mud since I never had it in a muddy combat environment. I have used it in some pretty dusty and sandy condition, though. I guess I've probably fired 100+ rounds through it in the field overall and never had a problem with it.

 

post-1107-1189777932.jpg


Semper fi; Bill











donation2008.gifdonation2009.gifdonation2010.gifdonation2011.gif
donation2012.gifdonation2013.gifdonation2014.gifdonation2015.gifdonation2016.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We kept our Stoners well beyond the required turn-in date. Our Bn. Commander supported us and I understood that it took a direct order from MG Robertson before the Bn commander finally directed that they be turned in. Even after than, we still kept the belt-fed Stoner for another month or so. Below is a picture of Gertie Gugich and another of our Stoners, this one leaning against a rock alongside one of our M-14s (I find very little fault with the M-14 as well thumbsup.gif ). It's too bad Stoner Arms didn't have the money to spread around that Colt Industries had. In the time we used the Stoner, I don't recall one malfunction. In that same period of time, I could fill a book with the number of M-16 malfunctions.

 

I don't mean to get off the subject but I will make a couple comments about our experience with reliability of the M-16. When we were circling the LZ on final approach, I always had my Recon Marines carrying the M-16 assemble their cleaning rod and slide it down between their back and their rucksack so it would be handy to knock out the inevitable jammed cartridges. Many of our Marines carried AKs, grease guns, and all sorts of unauthorized weapons to the field. I remember in late summer of 67 (after the Bn Cdr took the heat on the Stoners) we were ordered to taker the M-16 to the field. Two of our guys compiled by breaking them down and shoving them in their rucksacks and they then carried an AK and grease gun respectively as their primary weapon. We had almost NO confidence in the M-16. :unsure:

 

OK, back on the topic of the thread and to your question about reliability: I don't know how the Sig would function in mud since I never had it in a muddy combat environment. I have used it in some pretty dusty and sandy condition, though. I guess I've probably fired 100+ rounds through it in the field overall and never had a problem with it.

 

After 40 years of talking to guys about infantry weapons I've come to the conclusion that the Stoner system was outstanding, the M60 was an excellent MG, the M14 was a reliable rifle, and the M16 was a problem although it did improve with the adoption of the A1 modifications. And everybody trusted the M1911/M1911A1 service pistol.

 

I qualified with the M14 at Parris Island in 1967, thought it was a fine rifle, and if I'd been sent to Viet Nam it would have been my choice over the M16/M16A1 and I understand individual Marines were still carrying M14's up until the late '60's.


Greg Robinson "marine-kabar"

donation2007.gifdonation2008.gifdonation2009.gifdonation2010.gif

**PLEASE NOTE: THIS COMMUNITY MEMBER, SADLY, HAS PASSED AWAY**

http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/index.php?/topic/106069-rip-greg-robinson/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.