GLM Posted July 14, 2007 Share #1 Posted July 14, 2007 Shown is the WWII "Economy Plastic" Enlisted Service Cover Emblem. I am not exactly sure which year the plastic pattern was adopted, but I believe it to be sometime in 1943, or shortly after war time strategic metals bans on bronze and brass went into effect. The only differences noticed in the plastic cover emblems I have encountered are colors, which range from medium chocolate brown to very dark brown (almost black). Also observed are two distinctly different rollers, with one pattern having a shorter finger-thumb grip. >>>---> Gary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLM Posted July 14, 2007 Author Share #2 Posted July 14, 2007 Also of interest, embossed numbers will be found on the reverses of the "economy plastic" cover emblems. Some collectors believe these numbers are maker's codes, but I believe they are nothing more than production run numbers to be used in case of high numbers of breakage or other defects in any given production run. So far, I have encountered numbers 1, 2 and 4 with a 2 to 1 find rate on 4's over the other numbers. If anyone has numbers other than what are shown, please let me know, so I can add those to my records. >>>---> Gary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brig Posted August 28, 2007 Share #3 Posted August 28, 2007 here is mine, also a triangle 2 marking...has a nice curve to it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USMCRECON Posted November 9, 2007 Share #4 Posted November 9, 2007 I just got the EGA below. I've had a pair of WW-II plastic lapel EGAs for some time but was not previously aware that the Marines also had plastic EGAs for the service (barracks) cover. Exept for the size, the fouled anchor, and the fact that the eagle's wings bent backward (and the size, of course) it looks just like my plastic lapel EGAs. Any comments? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbuehler Posted November 9, 2007 Share #5 Posted November 9, 2007 The cap ornaments are harder to find than the collar size. I have a uniform to a 2nd MarDiv Corporal that has all plastic ornaments (cap and collars) which is unusual. I have heard these plastic pieces were somewhat unpopular with many Gyrenes and probably many were replaced with the bronze when possible. For awhile these plastic egas were fetching pretty good prices, but they seem to have gone down quite a bit over the past couple of years. CB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teufelhunde.ret Posted November 10, 2007 Share #6 Posted November 10, 2007 These emblems are a very unique piece of wartime economy measures. The substance is actually Bakelite as is still used today to manufacture various products. Unfortunately they were not "Marine proof" thus did not last very long. More broken piece abound than those intact. They can be hand in sets for a reasonable price. That will change, as the EGA hobby advances and folks realize the diminished numbers in existence. Gary is attempting to determine the numbering system associated with the collar series, a link below. Collars: http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/ind...p?showforum=509 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brig Posted November 19, 2007 Share #7 Posted November 19, 2007 I bought one a few years back, as well. I see them fetching from 60-75 bucks at shows. As stated, they're more uncommon than their collar counterparts Nice example. Mine curves the same way, and is marked in the same place mine is on the first link Teufelhunde.ret has provided Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert60446 Posted April 1, 2008 Share #8 Posted April 1, 2008 Hi guys, I was just reviewing this thread about plastic EGA’s and Gary was puzzled by numbers on the reverse side of EGA (1, 2 and 4). I strongly believe these are not manufacturer’s codes, but rather mold numbers. Even today it is a common practice to number injection molds used by makers. Any other thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teufelhunde.ret Posted April 1, 2008 Share #9 Posted April 1, 2008 Robert... Thats an inquisitive thought and suggestion that had never crossed my mind and certainly deserves more consideration. The possible (and likely) merit to your suggestion is the type of marking that were exhibited on the reverse of the cap emblems. I presume that mold numbers were very much in use for tracking wear patterns as well as final product quality controls. You may very well have stumbled onto something... I love it....! Hope to hear the thoughts of others. s/f Darrell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert60446 Posted April 1, 2008 Share #10 Posted April 1, 2008 I presume that mold numbers were very much in use for tracking wear patterns as well as final product quality controls. Darrell, you are absolutely correct. Molds are usually numbered to help to track any production errors to the source – in this case mold. It is especially useful practice in mass production to ensure production quality. This could be also answer to why number 3 is not very common, maybe because mold #3 was faulted (or maybe was held in reserve). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert60446 Posted April 26, 2008 Share #11 Posted April 26, 2008 Hi guys, Finally I have my M37 Plastic Cover Cap. It is with small crack visible on the reverse, but hey, I’m not going to complain… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert60446 Posted April 26, 2008 Share #12 Posted April 26, 2008 Reverse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now