Jump to content
fabiobelgio

Medic Jump Wings

Recommended Posts

What about this medic jump wings ? Marked in the back sterling and probably with the NS Meyer shield...am I wrong ?

medice.jpg

medicback.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks to be a cast reproduction to me, sorry thumbdown.gif


Paul Conrad
Still looking for quality wings!

www.conradwings.com
donation2007.gifdonation2008.gif
donation2009.gifdonation2010.gifdonation2011.gifdonation2012.gif
donation2013.gifdonation2014.gifdonation2015.gifdonation2016.gif
donation2017.gifdonation2018.gifdonation2019.gif

I am bored prefixing everything I say with "I think" or "in my opinion".
Everything I say is my opinion; the only thing of which I am certain is that there is very little of which one can be certain.

 


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What does it means "cast" ?

 

 

Hi I will try to shed some light on this for you. Basically in this case casting is a method to reproduce the item in question i.e. the jump wings. The following link should provide you enough information one one method of casting. I hope this helps.

 

John

 

Lost Wax casting


Always looking for Wings & Named Air Medals!

Motto: To Collect, Preserve, and Remember!

 

 

 

 

donation2007.gifdonation2008.gifdonation2009.gifdonation2010.gif

donation2011.gifdonation2012.gifdonation2013.gifdonation2014.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know its cast, I cast it. Always look at the edge of a wing / badge. The mold line will not be 100% straight while it die struck it will be. Also you can go to www.1903.com and see all the items I make as a guide.

 

Joe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I know its cast, I cast it. Always look at the edge of a wing / badge. The mold line will not be 100% straight while it die struck it will be. Also you can go to www.1903.com and see all the items I make as a guide.

 

Joe

 

I don't mean to be a jerk, but can I ask why the word "copy" wasn't stamped into the reverse on your badges? They are set to lose a lot of money belonging to unsuspecting collectors.

 

-Ski


In Memory Of......
Pte Harold Griffiths, 1805, 1/6th Manchester Regt, KIA June 4th, 1915 in Gallipoli
Cpl Isaac Judges, 40494, 6th East Yorkshire Regt, KIA October 3rd, 1917 in Ypres
May they rest in peace.....

MSgt - USAF Retired

donation2008.gifdonation2009.gifdonation2010.gifdonation2011.gif

donation2012.gifdonation2013.gifdonation2014.gifdonation2015.gifdonation2016.gif

donation2017.gif


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't mean to be a jerk, but can I ask why the word "copy" wasn't stamped into the reverse on your badges? They are set to lose a lot of money belonging to unsuspecting collectors.

 

-Ski

Totally agree. This example and many others.

Kurt


donation2007.gifdonation2008.gifdonation2009.gifdonation2010.gifdonation2011.gif


donation2012.gifdonation2013.gifdonation2014.gifdonation2015.gifdonation2016.gif


donation2017.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it legal to reproduce an item and use a trademark of a company that originally made the piece? I know Meyer is out of business, but is it OK to put the Meyer shield on the back?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Duncan told me never to stamp copy or reproduction on any item. He said that way the dealers would remove the word and have proof it was real.

 

As for names - if the trademark is no longer registered, it is not illegal to use.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Duncan told me never to stamp copy or reproduction on any item. He said that way the dealers would remove the word and have proof it was real.

 

As for names - if the trademark is no longer registered, it is not illegal to use.

 

I hate to say that whoever Duncan is, wanted to leave the door open to decieve collectors. Wouldn't you think that any marking removed from a badge would tip off somebody that something doesn't look right? I don't go with this argument. At the very least, you could of stamped the badges upside down, which would help the collecting community ID them as fakes. I appreciate you responding, though. I wish better judgement was used in creating copies like these on the open market, especially with the likes of E-Bay bandits abound.

 

-Ski


In Memory Of......
Pte Harold Griffiths, 1805, 1/6th Manchester Regt, KIA June 4th, 1915 in Gallipoli
Cpl Isaac Judges, 40494, 6th East Yorkshire Regt, KIA October 3rd, 1917 in Ypres
May they rest in peace.....

MSgt - USAF Retired

donation2008.gifdonation2009.gifdonation2010.gifdonation2011.gif

donation2012.gifdonation2013.gifdonation2014.gifdonation2015.gifdonation2016.gif

donation2017.gif


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He said that way the dealers would remove the word and have proof it was real.

 

Err....well...... then maybe we might have been able to spot where the VERY HELPFUL "COPY" markings had been removed.

 

Very sad


donation2012.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I hate to say that whoever Duncan is, wanted to leave the door open to decieve collectors. Wouldn't you think that any marking removed from a badge would tip off somebody that something doesn't look right? I don't go with this argument. At the very least, you could of stamped the badges upside down, which would help the collecting community ID them as fakes. I appreciate you responding, though. I wish better judgement was used in creating copies like these on the open market, especially with the likes of E-Bay bandits abound.

 

-Ski

I would assume that he is referring to Duncan Campbell, a WWII veteran and pioneer in the area of wings collecting. However, he passed away in late 2007 so, we have no way to ask him why he would have made such a strange statement. Again, that's assuming that he even made that statement. ermm.gif

 

On another note, I think that it's very easy to tell if a set of wings in cast like this. I'm not even a wings collector and I can tell. As long as historical items are sought after, reproductions will be out there. So, Caveat Emptor... let the buyer beware.


"There is no such thing as an expert, only students with different levels of education."
donation2007.gifdonation2008.gifdonation2009.gifdonation2010.gifdonation2011.gif
donation2012.gifdonation2013.gifdonation2014.gifdonation2015.gifdonation2016.gif
donation2017.gifdonation2018.gifdonation2019.gifdonation2020.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Err....well...... then maybe we might have been able to spot where the VERY HELPFUL "COPY" markings had been removed.

 

Very sad

 

I absolutely agree. Any 'reproduced' item. i.e. not made by the original manufacturer should be marked 'copy' Many of these items now sold as unmarked reproductions will become 'genuine' items in the future. Very sad.

Bobgee


donation2007.gifdonation2008.gifdonation2009.gifdonation2010.gifdonation2011.gif
donation2012.gifdonation2013.gifdonation2014.gifdonation2015.gifdonation2016.gif
donation2017.gifdonation2018.gifdonation2019.gifdonation2020.gif
"I have only two men out of my company and 20 out of some other company. We need support, but it is almost suicide to try to get it here as we are swept by machine gun fire and constant barrage is on us. I have no one on my left and only a few on my right. I will hold." (Message sent by 1st Lt. Clifton B. Cates. USMC, 96th Co., Soissons, 19 July 1918 - later 19th Commandant of the Marine Corps 1948-1952)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These as well as the WW1 pilots wings have been avaiable at the SOS for several years.A friend here in Iowa has several sets of the various wings in his shop as reproductions but has said many have been sold by others as originals.

 

RD


In Memoriam:
Lieutenant J.Kostelec 1-3 First Special Service Force MIA/PD 4 March 1944 Italy
I HAVE SEEN THE ENEMY AND IT IS DAYLIGHT
Forget about the tips..We'll get hell to pay (AC/DC)
"If you cant get out and run with the big dogs then sit on the porch and bark at the cars going by.."

Have you Hugged a Clown Today?

You Cant Get A Sun Tan On The Moon..





Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Err....well...... then maybe we might have been able to spot where the VERY HELPFUL "COPY" markings had been removed.

 

Very sad

 

I absolutely agree. Any 'reproduced' item. i.e. not made by the original manufacturer should be marked 'copy' Many of these items now sold as unmarked reproductions will become 'genuine' items in the future. Very sad.

Bobgee


donation2007.gifdonation2008.gifdonation2009.gifdonation2010.gifdonation2011.gif
donation2012.gifdonation2013.gifdonation2014.gifdonation2015.gifdonation2016.gif
donation2017.gifdonation2018.gifdonation2019.gifdonation2020.gif
"I have only two men out of my company and 20 out of some other company. We need support, but it is almost suicide to try to get it here as we are swept by machine gun fire and constant barrage is on us. I have no one on my left and only a few on my right. I will hold." (Message sent by 1st Lt. Clifton B. Cates. USMC, 96th Co., Soissons, 19 July 1918 - later 19th Commandant of the Marine Corps 1948-1952)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Duncan told me never to stamp copy or reproduction on any item.

 

If you're making reproductions, copies, fakes, they need to be marked as such, especially if they are exact copies of the original item and likely to deceive collectors as they are passed on from one to another and age.


k9vetsday.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A. It's not his responsibility to stamp "Copy" or "Reproduction" on his items. I disagree with his use a hallmark, and yes, I would like some sort of identifier that is reproduction, but ultimately he is free to do what he wants; that's capitalism, folks!

 

B. It is my responsibility as the consumer to know what I'm doing, and if I get burned on an item like this, that's my fault. Always know your stuff before you go out and buy. Anyone who's looked at two or three WWII wings should be able to tell that this piece is a reproduction. Know your stuff.

 

My two cents, for what their worth,

 

Beau


donation2008.gif

donation2009.gifdonation2010.gifdonation2012.gif

 

Collecting 29th Division and Virginia-Related Items!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A. It's not his responsibility to stamp "Copy" or "Reproduction" on his items. I disagree with his use a hallmark, and yes, I would like some sort of identifier that is reproduction, but ultimately he is free to do what he wants; that's capitalism, folks!

 

B. It is my responsibility as the consumer to know what I'm doing, and if I get burned on an item like this, that's my fault. Always know your stuff before you go out and buy. Anyone who's looked at two or three WWII wings should be able to tell that this piece is a reproduction. Know your stuff.

 

My two cents, for what their worth,

 

Beau

 

 

Agreed 100% with that. He's man enough to come on here and admit that the work is his, and he doesn't make any false statements that they're original, real, authentic, etc -- he makes reproduction items for collectors, and presumably reenactors who don't want to spend the hundreds of dollars on the real thing. I see nothing wrong with it -- it would help if they were marked, but just like the easy-green helmets and all the other "notorious" sellers of reproduction items, he's found a niche and sold items that people want. It's not his job once they're sold to police them and make sure fools don't spend large amounts of money without doing their homework because some crooked scumbag is looking to make a buck. I find it in poor taste for people to jump his case like I'm seeing here.


donation2008.gifdonation2009.gifdonation2010.gif

donation2011.gifdonation2012.gifdonation2013.gifdonation2014.gifdonation2015.gif

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All I undestand this can be an emotional topic and can understand both sides here. I think expressing you position on this is vaild... all I ask is that you keep the tone civil.

 

As an FYI - A Dallas wing recently up on Ebay made by Joe and being sold as REAL had its discription changed because as I undestand it Joe contacted the seller and informed him it was one he made. my source form this information was the seller.

 

John


Always looking for Wings & Named Air Medals!

Motto: To Collect, Preserve, and Remember!

 

 

 

 

donation2007.gifdonation2008.gifdonation2009.gifdonation2010.gif

donation2011.gifdonation2012.gifdonation2013.gifdonation2014.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A. It's not his responsibility to stamp "Copy" or "Reproduction" on his items. I disagree with his use a hallmark, and yes, I would like some sort of identifier that is reproduction, but ultimately he is free to do what he wants; that's capitalism, folks!

 

B. It is my responsibility as the consumer to know what I'm doing, and if I get burned on an item like this, that's my fault. Always know your stuff before you go out and buy. Anyone who's looked at two or three WWII wings should be able to tell that this piece is a reproduction. Know your stuff.

 

My two cents, for what their worth,

 

Beau

 

 

While I agree mostly with what you said Beau, if one is a seller of certain items, let's say militaria, they can sometimes be viewed as an "expert" in their field and could be held liable for selling a fake item as real. I agree that a person should know and have an understanding about items that they wish to collect, but the seller is and should be responsible for doing the right thing as well.

 

I believe there have been a few cases where big time collector/dealers have been prosecuted for misrepresenting items as less than they actually were then they purchased those items for pennies on the dollar.

 

The fact is, it isn't right to sell items as real, knowing full well that they are not. (I am not saying that the person who made these is doing this) although they are making it easier for the scumbags to resell them as real.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, forget for a minute about stamping the word "reproduction" on the back of these fakes. How about just not putting the original maker's hallmark on them? Check out all the WW1 wings on the seller's site. All kinds of maker hallmarks are being used.

 

Aside from the debates of what's right/what's wrong, what's legal/what's illegal, the bottom line is; deceptive, unmarked reproductions, such as these wings have a net negative effect on our hobby of militaria collecting.

 

The future of the militaria collecting is often discussed on the various forums - How many new collectors come along that get screwed on repro stuff and just walk away in disgust? It doesn't matter that these wings are initially being clearly identified as reproductions. One or two sellers later, they're probably often misrepresented as something else.

 

Kurt


donation2007.gifdonation2008.gifdonation2009.gifdonation2010.gifdonation2011.gif


donation2012.gifdonation2013.gifdonation2014.gifdonation2015.gifdonation2016.gif


donation2017.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
being sold as REAL had its discription changed because as I understand it Joe contacted the seller and informed him it was one he made.

 

Well, I must give credit where it is due. thumbsup.gif


donation2012.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
All I undestand this can be an emotional topic and can understand both sides here. I think expressing you position on this is vaild... all I ask is that you keep the tone civil.

 

As an FYI - A Dallas wing recently up on Ebay made by Joe and being sold as REAL had its discription changed because as I undestand it Joe contacted the seller and informed him it was one he made. my source form this information was the seller.

 

John

this is fine and well that mr *************** contacted the seller on ebay and had them change their description but what about when some one sells one of his repos/fakes at a show or off of some website that mr *************** doesnt see and its sold as original is he gonna buck up when some sucker shows off his new original ww1 wing here on the forum and finds out its fake after spending big dollars for it

i understand buyer beware but if they were marked as repo/fake/copy then this wouldnt ever be an issue

i think if its a repo it should be marked as such and not marked with original looking maker marks brian


RIP Sgt Adam J. Ray 4th Bn, 23rd Infantry Regiment, 5th Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 2nd Infantry Division Feb 9, 2010 Southern Afghanistan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i understand buyer beware but if they were marked as repo/fake/copy then this wouldnt ever be an issue

i think if its a repo it should be marked as such and not marked with original looking maker marks brian

In a perfect world every repro would be properly marked as such... and every puppy would never become a dog and men would understand women. To this day, that cute puppy that my wife wanted is now MY dog ^_^ , I still don't understand women pinch.gif and repro's continue to be made without any distinguishing markings showing them to be repro's disgust.gif . This is done despite all the numerous threads we've seen on the subject. Until it becomes illegal we are left with two choices: 1) we can complain and things remain the same -or- 2) We can learn and educate collectors on what to watch for. I know it's a sad commentary but, a fact none the less.


"There is no such thing as an expert, only students with different levels of education."
donation2007.gifdonation2008.gifdonation2009.gifdonation2010.gifdonation2011.gif
donation2012.gifdonation2013.gifdonation2014.gifdonation2015.gifdonation2016.gif
donation2017.gifdonation2018.gifdonation2019.gifdonation2020.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Repros have always been a problem in the military collecting arena but with the addition of auction websites, namely eBay, repros and fantasy pieces have exploded on the scene. If there's a buck to be made you will find unscrupulous dealers on eBay, at flea markets, military shows, etc. hawking their bogus merchandise to unsuspecting collectors.

 

I would rather overpay for an authentic piece than buy a repro or fake at a "bargain" price! I fear the uninformed collecting community is in for a rude

awakening years down the road when they realize their collections are "worthless"!

 

 

George


donation2009.gifdonation2010.gifdonation2011.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.