iron bender Posted September 28, 2022 Share #1 Posted September 28, 2022 My dad bought this steel scabbard, 1863 Ames sword in 1985 or 86 from (I think) Red Jackson's store, Jackson Arms. Curious about the engraving on the reverse of the scabbard throat. Can anyone from my questionable pics determine if this original to 1863? One concern I have is the sword being produced in 1863 and being engraved in March 63. Pretty short timeline, but I guess plausible as a purchase from a retailer. The engraving reads as follows Presented to -- Sergeant Major William R. (K?) Palmer 8th Conn. Inf. March 1863 for distinguished service I tried searching for the guy but no luck. Seems a Sergeant Major who would have likely been at Antietam would be a quick search. Any opinions/facts are appreciated. Please let me know if better pics are needed. Thanks in advance! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iron bender Posted September 28, 2022 Author Share #2 Posted September 28, 2022 I know the sword itself is original, I'm curious, specifically, about the engraving Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill_Carman Posted September 28, 2022 Share #3 Posted September 28, 2022 This may be your guy: Detail Source Name: William R Palmer Birth Place: Rhode Island Enlistment Date:11 Sep 1861 Enlistment Rank: Private Muster Date:21 Sep 1861 Muster Place: Connecticut Muster Company: G Muster Regiment: 8th Infantry Muster Regiment Type: Infantry Muster Information: Enlisted Rank Change Date:16 Jul 1862 Rank Change Rank: Sergeant Major Transfer date:16 Jul 1862 Transfer From Unit: G Transfer To Unit: S Muster Out Date:31 Mar 1863 Muster Out Information: Transferred Side of War: Union Survived War?: Yes Was Officer?: Yes Residence Place: Stonington, Connecticut Additional Notes 2:Muster 2 Date: 31 Mar 1863; Muster 2 Place: Connecticut; Muster 2 Unit: 1514; Muster 2 Company: C; Muster 2 Regiment: 40th Infantry; Muster 2 Regiment Type: Infantry; Muster 2 Information: Transferred; Muster 3 Date: 19 Aug 1863; Muster 3 Place: Connecticut; Muster 3 Unit: 3728; Muster 3 Regiment: Commissary Dept; Muster 3 Information: Commission; Rank Change 2 Date: 01 Jan 1863; Rank Change 2 Rank: Private; Rank Change 2 Information: Reduced to ranks; Rank Change 3 Date: 31 Mar 1863; Rank Change 3 Rank: 2nd Lieutenant; Rank Change 4 Date: 19 Aug 1863; Rank Change 4 Rank: Captain; Rank Change 4 Information: Captain & Commissary of Subsistence; Transfer 2 Date: 01 Jan 1863; Transfer 2 From Unit: S; Transfer 2 To Unit: G; MusterOut 2 Date: 19 Aug 1863; MusterOut 2 Information: disch for Promo; MusterOut 3 Date: 29 Mar 1865; MusterOut 3 Information: Resigned; Title:Connecticut: Record of Service of Men during War of Rebellion; New York: Report of the Adjutant-General 1893-1906; Heitman: Register of United States Army 1789-1903 Save Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iron bender Posted September 29, 2022 Author Share #4 Posted September 29, 2022 Yes sir. That's gotta be him. Thanks so much for the information. Muster March 63 must have been the reason for the presentation sword. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SARGE Posted October 1, 2022 Share #5 Posted October 1, 2022 I don't want to rain on your parade but there is a reason that hand lettered Civil War period presentation inscriptions like this are questioned. Joe Walters ran House of Swords and Militaria in Kansas City for many years and produced hundreds of swords like this. He employed a retired jeweler to hand cut inscriptions like this on the brass fittings of original CW swords in his basement workshop. Walters would look up legitimate information in the ORs and then craft an inscription that would seem legitimate when the soldier was looked up in research. These fake inscriptions on legitimate swords are very good fakes. They are well known among old edged weapon collectors who tend to steer clear of these types of presentation swords. Swords with etched presentations on the blade were not done by Walters so they are a much safer bet. I hope this information is helpful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KurtA Posted October 1, 2022 Share #6 Posted October 1, 2022 And figure that these NCO swords were easily obtainable in the $100 range back in the 80’s. Plenty of “raw material” to work with for a modest investment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iron bender Posted October 1, 2022 Author Share #7 Posted October 1, 2022 Thanks for the input. I've never trusted anything like this. I didn't even realize it had the engraving until I took a repro nco baldric off of it. Well, if nothing else I learned some Civil War unit history on the 8th Connecticut Infantry. Again thanks! Love this forum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marktk36thIL Posted October 2, 2022 Share #8 Posted October 2, 2022 Definitely a House of Swords inscription unfortunately. And I'm a firm believer that they did a couple revolvers as well. One thing to note, it seemed that also one letter or initial was misspelled in the inscriptions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iron bender Posted October 2, 2022 Author Share #9 Posted October 2, 2022 I'm not familiar with House of Swords or Joe Walters. Was there one engraver or multiple? ie does all the engraving follow the same form? Were musician/nco swords the only canvas as far as swords go? For future forum searchers, this info could come in handy. Thankfully I like the sword for what it is, a wartime nco sword Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SARGE Posted October 2, 2022 Share #10 Posted October 2, 2022 House of Swords is long gone. Joe put out a thick professionally done photo catalog with generally one B/W picture of each edged weapon overall. I would always get his newest catalog to see what the latest fakes were that were being offered. This was back in the 1970s - 80s or thereabouts. He was a clever fellow who would mix in perfectly good items with perhaps 10%-20% fakes. His early fakes were quite good but he wound up as having more fake parts than real on his creations. US Customs finally got him importing fakes from Pakistan without marking their country of origin. He was banned from the local KC gun shows but he had a shill take some of his stuff and set up at shows. He would always return your money quickly if you complained. He was robbed and shot dead years ago but his fake swords still pop up at shows where you have to give the current owner the bad news. Search for House of Swords or Joe Walters in the forum search feature. All part of this very interesting hobby I am afraid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KurtA Posted October 2, 2022 Share #11 Posted October 2, 2022 I also used to get his catalogs back in the 80’s. They were rather expensive. $12 or so if I recall. Yes, there would always be some really good original items listed at great prices. But if you called 30 seconds after receiving the catalog, those items were always “sold”. He probably made more selling fake catalogs than his fake swords. I finally wised up and stopped buying his catalogs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st Sgt CES Posted November 22, 2022 Share #12 Posted November 22, 2022 Bullion Wings too ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now