Amateur Vietnam Collector Posted March 14, 2021 Share #1 Posted March 14, 2021 Hi All, Being an amateur at collecting Vietnam war gear, I saw a Type II Utility shirt with a special forces badge on eBay with 10 min left and bought it. The special forces patch is on the right shoulder, which I understand to be a combat patch. The pictures aren’t good of the left shoulder, but it doesn’t look like there is an SSI badge. I tried reaching out to the seller, but she hasn’t responded yet (not a good sign). She’ll respond eventually, but I thought it would be a good question for this forum. If a soldier has a combat badge and is still serving in the same unit as the combat badge, is it necessary for them to wear an SSI badge on their left shoulder? Thank you for any help! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longhorn92 Posted March 14, 2021 Share #2 Posted March 14, 2021 If there is no SSI on the left shoulder then it was removed by someone for whatever reason. It should always be there. In garrison, anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amateur Vietnam Collector Posted March 14, 2021 Author Share #3 Posted March 14, 2021 That’s what I was afraid of. I think I’ll return the shirt if there is no evidence of a badge being removed. You would see the outline of the badge if it was removed, because it was sewn on, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longhorn92 Posted March 14, 2021 Share #4 Posted March 14, 2021 You should able to see the outline, yes. Even if the patch is missing you might be able to see what it was and replace it. You’re missing the rank, too, so you’d have to display as is or replace those, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longhorn92 Posted March 14, 2021 Share #5 Posted March 14, 2021 I’d keep it, btw. That very likely belonged to a known SF medic. Henry Luthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amateur Vietnam Collector Posted March 14, 2021 Author Share #6 Posted March 14, 2021 I think I’ll keep it then! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
18-Echo Posted March 15, 2021 Share #7 Posted March 15, 2021 This shirt is interesting. Pockets are odd. Buttons are also odd. Better pictures would help. I’m not saying that in a bad way. I’m not a uniform guy but the little I do know is making me wonder. It doesn’t look like a standard US uniform = again, that may be a good thing. Is there a tag inside? I’m betting no (I’m a terrible gambler by the way) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patches Posted March 15, 2021 Share #8 Posted March 15, 2021 This is one of those Army-Navy Store/PX Types, made in Cotton Poplin, though they were also made in Cotton Sateen. companies such as BVD, Sweet Orr, Fruit of the Loom, a firm called Aronoff to name a few made these. GIs, officers too did indeed wear these, with their matching poplin pants. The Aronoff ones, the pants I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patches Posted March 15, 2021 Share #9 Posted March 15, 2021 Can't say on why no organizational shoulder patch. if it is Henry Luthy's (Google him Henry Luthy Vietnam for his bio) it was worn probably stateside at one point, late 60s, or early 70s, when he was a instructor at Bragg, then would think a subdued JFK patch with AIRBORNE tab would of been worn. Is it a large size, Luthy seems to have been big. also are there makings on the collar were pin ranks were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amateur Vietnam Collector Posted March 15, 2021 Author Share #10 Posted March 15, 2021 Thank you all for your input. Based on the pictures the seller finally sent me and everyone’s input, I decided to return the shirt. It just didn’t seem authentic. I learned a lot from y’all. Thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike2013 Posted March 27, 2021 Share #11 Posted March 27, 2021 interesting as it seems that uniform did belong to the command seargent major luthy as did the others i had and have.lol learn something new every day,, semper fi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amateur Vietnam Collector Posted March 27, 2021 Author Share #12 Posted March 27, 2021 Are you saying you owned the shirt mentioned in this post? Or, are you saying you have other uniforms of Luthy’s? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacksmith Posted March 27, 2021 Share #13 Posted March 27, 2021 On 3/15/2021 at 6:21 PM, Amateur Vietnam Collector said: Thank you all for your input. Based on the pictures the seller finally sent me and everyone’s input, I decided to return the shirt. It just didn’t seem authentic. I learned a lot from y’all. Thank you! Maybe, in the future, post for opinions FIRST, and save everybody a bunch of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amateur Vietnam Collector Posted March 27, 2021 Author Share #14 Posted March 27, 2021 You are correct, sir. I should have asked for opinions first. I apologize for wasting people’s time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacksmith Posted March 27, 2021 Share #15 Posted March 27, 2021 Main concern is for you and the seller, especially considering that you may one day find yourself in a predicament where you get stuck with an item. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longhorn92 Posted March 27, 2021 Share #16 Posted March 27, 2021 I still think it was Luthy’s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amateur Vietnam Collector Posted March 27, 2021 Author Share #17 Posted March 27, 2021 Well, live and learn. That’s why I call myself an amateur. I probably should have taken your advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike2013 Posted April 5, 2021 Share #18 Posted April 5, 2021 ty for your interest in the item, my friend is new to the bay, she should have answered you sooner, dont be hard on yourself you will learn what is what after time of collecting, i sold all my luthy stuff but will keep you in mind if we find more , god bless brother, semper fi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amateur Vietnam Collector Posted April 5, 2021 Author Share #19 Posted April 5, 2021 21 minutes ago, mike2013 said: ty for your interest in the item, my friend is new to the bay, she should have answered you sooner, dont be hard on yourself you will learn what is what after time of collecting, i sold all my luthy stuff but will keep you in mind if we find more , god bless brother, semper fi Thank you so much. Yes, I’ve been kicking myself, so it is nice to hear you say not to be too hard on myself. God bless you too, and thank you for your service in the Marines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwb123 Posted April 5, 2021 Share #20 Posted April 5, 2021 If someone would have assembled this as a fake, they would have made sure to put an insignia on the left shoulder. There are a dozen reasons why a uniform might have a right shoulder "combat" patch and not have a left shoulder patch for a currently assigned unit. The shirt looks barely worn. It may have been assembled at the end of one tour in anticipation of moving to the next duty station. With a change of orders, there may have been a change in uniform, and the fatigues were never needed. I would have kept this one for my closet. You just do not find that many with a CMB assigned to an SF unit. The fact that it is a nonstandard uniform just makes it all the more interesting. Better luck next time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amateur Vietnam Collector Posted April 6, 2021 Author Share #21 Posted April 6, 2021 11 hours ago, gwb123 said: If someone would have assembled this as a fake, they would have made sure to put an insignia on the left shoulder. There are a dozen reasons why a uniform might have a right shoulder "combat" patch and not have a left shoulder patch for a currently assigned unit. The shirt looks barely worn. It may have been assembled at the end of one tour in anticipation of moving to the next duty station. With a change of orders, there may have been a change in uniform, and the fatigues were never needed. I would have kept this one for my closet. You just do not find that many with a CMB assigned to an SF unit. The fact that it is a nonstandard uniform just makes it all the more interesting. Better luck next time. Thank you for your response. I’m learning that so called “imperfections” in a shirt do not necessarily make the uniform less desirable or fake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BILL THE PATCH Posted April 6, 2021 Share #22 Posted April 6, 2021 You are correct, sir. I should have asked for opinions first. I apologize for wasting people’s time.No need to apologize, thats how you learn. And for me it wasn't a waste of time, I enjoyed reading the thread. Sent from my moto g(7) play using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amateur Vietnam Collector Posted April 6, 2021 Author Share #23 Posted April 6, 2021 1 minute ago, BILL THE PATCH said: No need to apologize, thats how you learn. And for me it wasn't a waste of time, I enjoyed reading the thread. Sent from my moto g(7) play using Tapatalk Thank you so much, sir Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now