Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Came across these clippings from the Air Service Journal Vol 4 (JAN-JUL 1919).  They don't particularly shed any new light on the matter, but it is interesting to see what was being written contemporaneously:

 

1017116496_ScreenShot2021-01-17at11_48_00AM.png.92f6c363f04de0b22ef09dd87410265b.png

 

Then in mid February:

 

1067170070_ScreenShot2021-01-17at11_50_12AM.png.243e2b6b47d9c7301ae7a806b4152851.png

 

Finally this interesting bit by the end of February:

 

1978336415_ScreenShot2021-01-17at11_53_43AM.png.cbc5114bd9763d8ed4dbeee8750f57c9.png

 

The bit about "Fake Insignia" begs the question:  Could this represent a lead pointing to the origin of the "FROM OFFICIAL DIE" stamping?  More research needs to be done.

 

Chris

Posted

Ok Chris, for your next assignment, please find a copy of Special Regulations No. 42 that describes the new insignia. 

 

The following is from Special Regulations No. 41 in 1917 , and the descriptions of the insignis are much less detailed than what was included in the Air Service Journal article you shared.  Did you find original copies to review in your current assignment, or scanned copies somewhere?

 

image.png.3f257b2896e5ba1795ab22e20eea1b76.png

Posted

I found a scanned copy online, but I am not able to download or print it.  Th descriptions of the new insignia are the same as was given in the Service Journal.  It is interesting the Service Journal was dated January 11, 1919 while the changes were included in Changes No. 7 dated January 25, 1919.

rathbonemuseum.com
Posted

I am glad you found that service journal article from February, the second one posted. It clearly reflects what a lot of us have commented on, to whit: "how did they go from this high style and fabrication to this incredibly plain, monotonous design?" Clearly the ones who would wear the new wings were not fans!

Posted

Thanks for posting this Chris, great information!
John

Posted

Here are copies from the actual regulations showing the dates they were done.  The verbiage looks the same as what was in the articles.

 

SR 42 1917 page 3.jpg

SR 42 1917 page 25.jpg

SR 42 1917 page 47.jpg

SR 42 Change No 1 page 1.jpg

SR 42 Change No 1 page 3-a.jpg

SR 42 Change No 1 page 3-b.jpg

SR 42 Change No 6 page 1.jpg

SR 42 Change No 6 page 2.jpg

SR 42 Change No 7 page 1.jpg

SR 42 Change No 7 page 2-a.jpg

SR 42 Change No 7 page 2-b.jpg

  • 1 year later...
rathbonemuseum.com
Posted

Illustrated below is a memorandum dated November 9, 1918 which specifies the nature of the "Official Die" and how manufacturers were to obtain working dies to create official insignia. The Commission of Fine Arts, once it had created the approved pattern, was to create an official master die to be held by the US Mint, Philidelphia under the direction of the QM Depot. Manufacturers could then apply to use the die and at their cost, create working dies.

92FC0C74-4EAD-492B-ABFA-091DE62CDE8F_1_105_c.jpeg

  • 2 months later...
rathbonemuseum.com
Posted

A "From Official Die" Adams pattern wing to add to my collection. Really happy to finally land this. Some interesting elements of this particular example: 1) the little "hot dog" die blemish on the left wing, inside edge; 2) the break in the lowest part of the shield edge; and 3) the sterling stamped upside down. 

92C62D20-16F9-43DE-AAC6-596ACE6DAC1F_4_5005_c.jpeg

D21E29F4-3ACD-42DB-99C7-219B53286D7A_4_5005_c.jpeg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...