GITom1944 Posted August 21, 2017 Share #1 Posted August 21, 2017 This photo is from the local Historical Society - it has been in the collection with no identifying information. I'm trying to pin down when it was taken and I thought some of you might have a keener eye for naval uniform details than I. One thing I was able to figure out: the photo was not taken in the Far East. The pagoda is on the grounds of a mansion in Newport, RI. The two sailors are on the cliff walk that is still a popular sight-seeing attraction. I have a hunch they may be members of the Connecticut Naval Militia on a summer cruise before the U.S. entry into WW1. Any other ideas? Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patches Posted August 24, 2017 Share #2 Posted August 24, 2017 Well it would have to date after 1908. So yes. lets say 1920s for the sake of argument. This from the WIKI on the location of this Chinese building, which is the Vanderbilt Marble House When Alva Vanderbilt divorced William in 1895, she already owned Marble House outright, having received it as her 39th birthday present. Upon her remarriage in 1896 to Oliver Hazard Perry Belmont, she relocated down the street to Belmont's mansion, Belcourt. After his death, she reopened Marble House and added the Chinese Tea House on the seaside cliff, where she hosted rallies for women's suffrage Oliver Hazard Perry Belmont dies in 1908. As far as unit, Newport Rhode Island did and does have a Navy Yard, so these guys are most likely station there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GITom1944 Posted August 25, 2017 Author Share #3 Posted August 25, 2017 Thanks, Patches. Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RustyCanteen Posted August 26, 2017 Share #4 Posted August 26, 2017 Two seaman (white stripe), and I would agree most likely anywhere from WWI to 1920s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themick Posted August 26, 2017 Share #5 Posted August 26, 2017 I don't believe the two images portray the same building. Too many major differences. Study them both carefully. Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patches Posted August 26, 2017 Share #6 Posted August 26, 2017 I don't believe the two images portray the same building. Too many major differences. Study them both carefully. Steve Hmm the current photo shows extensive renovations/restorations and reconstruction of it's base/foundation as well as it being appeantly relocated back from the waters edge (as seen in the comtempory aerial photo of it). does have some differans though from what were seeing in the OP photo, the sides for one, while the roof looks the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patches Posted August 26, 2017 Share #7 Posted August 26, 2017 A thought, could the sides in the OP photo be of a temporary War Time application, to cover the ornate sides??? If this is so, then WWI, like some time in 1917-18 then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sigsaye Posted August 26, 2017 Share #8 Posted August 26, 2017 The way the neckerchief are tied is the style of WW1 (era). If you look at the Sailors cuffs, you see there are no stripes. This means they are Recruits (1 cuff stripe is Aprentice Seaman, or graduated Recruit, 2 is Seaman Second Class, 3 is Seaman First Class). Newport RI had a Recruit Training Center, from just before WW1 onward. These Sailors are on Recruit Liberty from RTC Newport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GITom1944 Posted December 22, 2017 Author Share #9 Posted December 22, 2017 Newport RI had a Recruit Training Center, from just before WW1 onward. These Sailors are on Recruit Liberty from RTC Newport. patches/sigsaye - A long overdue thank you for your info & comments. Very helpful. I should have kept checking the thread. Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patches Posted December 23, 2017 Share #10 Posted December 23, 2017 You know looking at the original post that you made, I do see some discrepancy in the way the ground is around this structure, (Something I believe The Mick also might of noticed when he said these are two different structures) the lay of the land just looks different from the old B/W photo of it that I posted and the stone base with that turreted/battlement affair. (those walls in yours I'm convinced was a Wartime measure to present less a view from the Heines, if they might come close to shore with a submarine.) So it occurred to me that the photo you have (Do you Own It?) and posted is a Reverse Image, see! See now how it looks much better, the sloping ground to our right and the sea to our left, with that turret/battlement on the other side out of view now. More to follow in the next quote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patches Posted December 23, 2017 Share #11 Posted December 23, 2017 The wear of the Seaman strip around the shoulder was of concern, that's the position we always see it, over the right, like in WWII. But check these out, seems in the WWI era they were worn the opposite (these are not reversed images as we see the cap tallies and top breast pockets), this was another clue that the OP photo was a revered image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patches Posted December 23, 2017 Share #12 Posted December 23, 2017 And one more WWI photo, Firemen. Man from USS Maine will be USS Maine (BB-10) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MastersMate Posted December 23, 2017 Share #13 Posted December 23, 2017 Somewhere around 1910sh the shoulder stripe changed from being a watch mark (port or stbd) to a branch mark (seaman or engineroom) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patches Posted December 23, 2017 Share #14 Posted December 23, 2017 Somewhere around 1910sh the shoulder stripe changed from being a watch mark (port or stbd) to a branch mark (seaman or engineroom) Do you have the background on the wear of these vis a vis WWI postion to the more familiar WWII era -present position MM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MastersMate Posted December 23, 2017 Share #15 Posted December 23, 2017 The January 1913 and 1917 USN Uniform Regs calls them Branch Marks. Worn by non rated men. The white or blue stripe is worn on the right shoulder seam of the blue or white jumper for those in the seaman branch.. The red is worn on the left shoulder of the blue and white uniforms for those of the engineroom artificers branch. Other branches, artificer, special, commissary, etc, etc, did not wear the branch stripes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patches Posted December 23, 2017 Share #16 Posted December 23, 2017 The January 1913 and 1917 USN Uniform Regs calls them Branch Marks. Worn by non rated men. The white or blue stripe is worn on the right shoulder seam of the blue or white jumper for those in the seaman branch.. The red is worn on the left shoulder of the blue and white uniforms for those of the engineroom artificers branch. Other branches, artificer, special, commissary, etc, etc, did not wear the branch stripes. Any reason why these saliors wear a White stripe on their left shoulder then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patches Posted December 23, 2017 Share #17 Posted December 23, 2017 Now we see White ones on the right in WWI, what gives??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MastersMate Posted December 23, 2017 Share #18 Posted December 23, 2017 "Any reason why these saliors wear a White stripe on their left shoulder then." A pre Nov 1912 photo of seaman 1st class assigned to the port watch. End of 1912 was the date that the stripe changed from a 'watch mark' to a 'branch mark'. 3 cuff stripes indicate seaman 1st class or petty officers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patches Posted December 23, 2017 Share #19 Posted December 23, 2017 "Any reason why these saliors wear a White stripe on their left shoulder then." A pre Nov 1912 photo of seaman 1st class assigned to the port watch. End of 1912 was the date that the stripe changed from a 'watch mark' to a 'branch mark'. 3 cuff stripes indicate seaman 1st class or petty officers. I got it now, thank you much, so maybe the image wasn't reversed at all then, and that wall area with the turreted area we see in the B/W photo I posted was built in the 20s-30s ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now