Misfit 45 Posted June 23, 2025 Author #101 Posted June 23, 2025 The "Made in USA" blade only came on the Kingston-45, during WWII. (I think)(unless you are referring to some of the bone handled knives. The screw driver must have been reshaped. I have not seen one that short (except on the very rare Stevenson/Robeson model which has a different shape). The can opener looks a little short....again, maybe reshaped. I think you're right. Post war parts knife. Great curiosity! Marv
John Sr. Posted June 23, 2025 #102 Posted June 23, 2025 2 minutes ago, Misfit 45 said: The "Made in USA" blade only came on the Kingston-45, during WWII. (I think)(unless you are referring to some of the bone handled knives. The screw driver must have been reshaped. I have not seen one that short (except on the very rare Stevenson/Robeson model which has a different shape). The can opener looks a little short....again, maybe reshaped. I think you're right. Post war parts knife. Great curiosity! Marv Thank you sir. I thought the same thing about the screwdriver being short, but I don’t see any evidence of being reshaped. This thing really has me scratching my head.
Catfishcraig Posted September 2, 2025 #103 Posted September 2, 2025 On 9/12/2024 at 2:22 PM, John Sr. said: I just got the smooth handle Kingston in the mail. I compared it to my other Kingston (also pictured) and the bail doesn’t look the same. I am aware that the tang stamps aren’t exactly the same either. The pins for the bail look good to me, but I am not smart enough to know if someone has changed it. My question is-does this bail look replaced? I hope I didn’t screw up buying this. I have never seen a smooth handle one other than a picture on here. thanks for any help, John I have one just like it. Here is my theory, mine is of the first configuration (main blade and screwdriver on the same side). These were earlier and with the need for pocket knives during the war, I don’t think these would have been set aside for sale after the war. My thoughts are that they were fitted with the same clevis that was used on the early engineers folding knives and sent to troops, maybe before the elongated clevis was mass produced. just my thoughts Craig
easterneagle87 Posted September 3, 2025 #104 Posted September 3, 2025 I passed up a heavily, blade corroded, rusted, steel dimple sided pocket knife this weekend. All I could read on the tang was USA and that was barely visible. No bail. Did I pass up something good?
John Sr. Posted September 3, 2025 #105 Posted September 3, 2025 1 hour ago, easterneagle87 said: I passed up a heavily, blade corroded, rusted, steel dimple sided pocket knife this weekend. All I could read on the tang was USA and that was barely visible. No bail. Did I pass up something good? I have seen WW2 Kingston’s matching your description with MADE IN USA & just USA tang stamps. But, most have no tang stamp and when marked it’s often, but not always, on the bale. I’m a sucker for these knives, so I try not to pass them up. As far as good, only if you’re into those, especially in that condition. I enjoy cleaning up a knife, I find it very relaxing. John
Catfishcraig Posted September 3, 2025 #106 Posted September 3, 2025 4 hours ago, Catfishcraig said: I have one just like it. Here is my theory, mine is of the first configuration (main blade and screwdriver on the same side). These were earlier and with the need for pocket knives during the war, I don’t think these would have been set aside for sale after the war. My thoughts are that they were fitted with the same clevis that was used on the early engineers folding knives and sent to troops, maybe before the elongated clevis was mass produced. just my thoughts Craig Pics for reference
John Sr. Posted September 3, 2025 #107 Posted September 3, 2025 1 minute ago, Catfishcraig said: Pics for reference Dang, that is a great knife.
Catfishcraig Posted September 3, 2025 #108 Posted September 3, 2025 Thanks John. I think it’s almost identical to the one you posted in this thread. Is yours first configuration as well?
John Sr. Posted September 5, 2025 #109 Posted September 5, 2025 On 9/3/2025 at 12:43 PM, Catfishcraig said: Thanks John. I think it’s almost identical to the one you posted in this thread. Is yours first configuration as well? Yes sir it’s a first configuration and has the small bail (or bale not sure).
WWIIReneactor Posted December 9, 2025 #110 Posted December 9, 2025 bit of a late comer to this discussion, here are pics (not mine) taken of a pocket knife i recently purchased on eBay any thoughts and opinions would be welcome to authenticate it being WWII issue. ( it does have brass spacers).
Misfit 45 Posted December 9, 2025 Author #111 Posted December 9, 2025 From what little I can see of the clevis, it looks like it is marked "Kingston". That would make it WWII. Lot of damage to the main blade. The knife itself is a second version where the can opener is on the same side as the main blade. Also, it is the Army issue knife. The Marine Corps marked their knives on the scales. Marv
WWIIReneactor Posted December 9, 2025 #112 Posted December 9, 2025 thanks Marv. it is indeed marked Kingston. i bought it as a WWII display Piece (hence not wanting it pristine) most of my original pieces are used to some degree. here are the rest of the pics for refference.
Misfit 45 Posted December 10, 2025 Author #113 Posted December 10, 2025 That's a good representative example. The brass liners are the first clue that it's a WWII piece. There are a couple of steel knives that have the brass liners made post war, but they will have a date on the clevis or the blade, so you can immediately rule them out as WWII. Thanks for sharing. Marv
Military Brat Posted March 9 #114 Posted March 9 This is very helpful. I have one of what I believe to be the early Kingston with no marking except for the Can Opener and Pat Pend on the can opener. The one thing that doesn't match any of the examples is that the Punch on my knife more like a small blade. Any thoughts on this one?
John Sr. Posted March 9 #115 Posted March 9 4 hours ago, Military Brat said: This is very helpful. I have one of what I believe to be the early Kingston with no marking except for the Can Opener and Pat Pend on the can opener. The one thing that doesn't match any of the examples is that the Punch on my knife more like a small blade. Any thoughts on this one? This was the Navy version. No punch, but does have a pen/secondary blade. Harder version to find. This has been sharpened a lot. If you decide to get rid of it please keep me in mind. Btw, you can tell the early Kingston by the main blade & cap lifter/screwdriver being on the same end. Always glad to help if I can, feel free to message me.
thorin6 Posted March 9 #116 Posted March 9 Here's my Navy version, the one on this post is only the second one I've seen.
John Sr. Posted March 9 #117 Posted March 9 Just now, thorin6 said: Here's my Navy version, the one on this post is only the second one I've seen. Nice example. After we are settled in and unboxed from moving, I will try to remember to get a picture of mine.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now