Jump to content

French and Indian War Campaign Chest

Recommended Posts

This campaign chest predates the American Revolution, but since the officer it belonged to had some interesting experiences during that period as well, I thought I would post it here. It had been in a D.A.R. chapter and was identified in a rather confused way as being Revolutionary War, but actually belonged to Lt. James Grant of Montgomery's Highlanders in the French and Indian War, and Pontiac's Rebellion. There were several officers by that name in the unit. Our man is James Grant #3 in the roster assembled by McCulloch in Volume 2 of Sons of the Mountains.

This campaign chest descended in the Grant family until the death of Lt. James Grant’s great-great-granddaughter in 1950, after which it was donated by her step-daughter to a D.A.R. chapter. A catalog index card from the chapter lists the chest, names the donor and links her through her stepmother to the Grant family of Wayne County, NY, formerly of Dutchess County. A direct line of descent connects the step-mother with Lt. James Grant, a British officer on half-pay, living on the Beekman Patent in Dutchess County from ca.1764 to 1796.

Lt. Grant served in the 77th Regiment from 1757 to 1763. He came out with the regiment as a “Gentleman Volunteer,” was commissioned ensign to date September 1758, lieutenant as of March 1762, and retired upon half-pay on December 24, 1763, on the disbanding of the regiment. Tracing service history for the period is difficult, but Grant is documented as present with the regiment on its two campaigns on the Forbes Road in 1758 and 1763. In recommending Grant for a commission as ensign, Col. Montgomery notes that he was, “a relation of Major Grant’s,” and specifically states he “was in the Late action,” referring to Major Grant’s disastrous raid on Fort Duquesne September 13, 1758.

Grant is a likely participant in Amherst’s 1759 expedition against Ticonderoga and Crown Point, the 1760 march from Fort Oswego to capture Montreal and the 1761 West Indies expedition. (His 1796 will specifically covers any property in the West Indies.) Many of the same companies participated in all three campaigns and ended up in the camps around New York, from which the relief forces later set out to aid Bouquet in suppressing Pontiac's Rebellion, and we know Grant was back on the Forbes Road with the regiment for that campaign. An Oct. 24, 1763, letter to Bouquet from “Lt. James Grant” of the 77th Regiment (the only lieutenant of that name in the regiment at the time) shows him to be in command of Fort Bedford, struggling to keep supply lines open. This suggests he may also be the “Lt. Grant” of the 77th sent as a messenger to Bouquet on June 14 from the commander of the highland light battalion hastily composed and rushed to Bouquet's aid. The dispatch he carried notified Bouquet of the unit’s march and requested further orders. In any case, he is a strong candidate as a participant in the Battle of Bushy Run.

With the disbanding of the 77th Regiment, Lt. Grant elected to remain in America. He petitioned for land grants due former soldiers in 1764 and 1765, and was one of the early settlers on the Beekman Patent in Dutchess County, N.Y. The name of his first wife is unknown, but she bore him James Grant, Jr., in 1770. A second wife, Christine McPherson, bore him the first of several more children in February 1777.

As a British officer on half-pay in New York during the Revolution, Grant had to tread carefully. Neighbors (and possibly relatives) had returned to duty in the British army or with loyalist units and he naturally fell under suspicion. Called before a committee in May, 1776, and offered the chance to sign a parole, he declined on the grounds that he was not an enemy to their principles, later noting, “the Professions of the Committee,” were then still “great to King and Country.” Instead, he struck a bargain to remain while on good behavior. After the Declaration Independence, however, there was less leeway. The agreement was modified in February, 1777, by the condition that he consider himself a prisoner of war to the State of New York on parole and limit his travels to a range of six miles. Occasional charges made by informers brought his name up before committees on conspiracies, but he kept his end of the bargain, earning the trust of Governor Clinton, who even gave him a pass for thirty days into New York City on private business in 1779.

In September, 1781, Grant petitioned Governor Clinton for relief from some conditions of his parole, with unknown results, but he successfully avoided any of the confiscations or sterner measures taken against loyalists. Indeed, he engaged in further land purchases and farming after the war. In his 1796 will he divides some 4,000 acres of land in Washington and Dutchess Counties.



Link to post
Share on other sites

I live up in the area mentioned in his engagements. If anyone has not visited upstate NY , fort ti, ft wm Henry, or the Saratoga battlefield just to name a few. Put it on your bucket list. You will not be disappointed. You get this feeling of wow this is where history happened and I'm standing right on the spot. Hard to describe in just typed words. What a wonderful chest!






Link to post
Share on other sites

THis is an outstanding example of a chest.THanks for posting this and the history.People do not realize with out posts like this many items of such historical value would not been seen or its history shared.


I hope more will view this post.Rarely will anyone have the opportunity to see something like this.

In Memoriam:
Lieutenant J.Kostelec 1-3 First Special Service Force MIA/PD 4 March 1944 Italy
Forget about the tips..We'll get hell to pay (AC/DC)
"If you cant get out and run with the big dogs then sit on the porch and bark at the cars going by.."

Have you Hugged a Clown Today?

You Cant Get A Sun Tan On The Moon..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the comments! Thanks dunmore1774 for the reference. I'll take a look.

I add a shot of the catalog index card from the D.A.R. chapter listing the chest. You can lose track counting the errors, but each element had a kernal of truth to it. The writer probably set down the information as she remembered it some time after the death of the donor in 1976 since the donor would certainly not have named her step-aunt as her grandmother. It took about a week to untangle everything. (The reference to "Lt. Bronk" (third line from the bottom) was a slip of the pen, the writer having just written that name at the end of the preceding line.)



Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.