cutiger83 Posted January 8, 2016 Share #1 Posted January 8, 2016 Women WWII Pilots Denied Final Rest at Arlington National Cemetery http://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/01/01/women-wwii-pilots-barred-from-arlington-national-cemetery.html The ashes of World War II veteran Elaine Harmon are sitting in a closet in her daughter's home, where they will remain until they can go to what her family says is her rightful resting place: Arlington National Cemetery. Granted veteran status in 1977, the WASPs have been eligible to have their ashes placed at Arlington with military honors since 2002. But earlier this year, then-Secretary of the Army John McHugh reversed course and ruled WASPs ineligible. After Harmon died in April at age 95, her daughter, Terry Harmon, 69, of Silver Spring, Maryland, was dismayed to learn that the Army had moved to exclude WASPs. She said her mother had helped lead the effort to gain recognition for WASPs. "These women have been fighting this battle, off and on, for over 50 years now," she said. Harmon's family and others are working to overturn McHugh's directive. A petition on change.org has received more than 4,000 signatures. Harmon also hopes Congress will ask incoming Secretary of the Army Eric Fanning about the issue at his upcoming confirmation hearing. WASPs "are a distinct group of women with the surviving 100-or-so women all in their 90s," she said. "It is just mean-spirited for the Secretary of the Army to question their value to their country. Again." Harmon's family says the WASPs aren't asking for anything beyond what they earned: eligibility for placement of ashes. And they say the impact on cemetery capacity would be minimal, given that so few World War II veterans remain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cutiger83 Posted January 8, 2016 Author Share #2 Posted January 8, 2016 "These women have been fighting this battle, off and on, for over 50 years now," she said. It is a real shame that these women who so valiantly served our country (38 of them lost their lives serving our country) are still having to fight for their rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wharfmaster Posted January 9, 2016 Share #3 Posted January 9, 2016 US Merchant Mariners didn't receive vets. status until 1988 and they had the highest percentage of war dead of all services during WW2. Wharf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cutiger83 Posted January 9, 2016 Author Share #4 Posted January 9, 2016 The Merchant Marines are also affected by this new directive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sundance Posted January 9, 2016 Share #5 Posted January 9, 2016 That is hard to believe. Was there some basis set out for that reversal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobgee Posted January 9, 2016 Share #6 Posted January 9, 2016 This is just plain wrong. They were certified as WWII veterans in 1977 and should be buried in the National Cemetery of their choice, My 2-cents. Bobgee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottG Posted January 13, 2016 Share #7 Posted January 13, 2016 I may be a bit off on this, but I think Arlington has made many changes due to demand/space constraints over the years. According to the current guidelines there are many veterans who are ineligible, not just WASPs. Criteria include active status, retired status, awards, holding public office etc... Scott. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cdubs Posted February 23, 2016 Share #8 Posted February 23, 2016 This is a tough one. I certainly acknowledge what this women did and her contribution to the war effort but I understand not allowing their burial. As ScottG stated above I think it comes down simply to Arlington running out of space. Would you give her a space over another who died in battle or was a MOH winner? Then your weighing and rating ones service over that of another. Personally I think any recipient of an action or honor medal ie; Silver Star, MOH or Purple Heart should be given priority. I think the practice of allowing politicians regardless of military service, burials at Arlington should cease. I think Arlington should be for Military personnel only. Its also a bit scary if were running out of spaces to properly bury our honored soldiers. Whats that say about us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cutiger83 Posted February 24, 2016 Author Share #9 Posted February 24, 2016 Would you give her a space over another who died in battle or was a MOH winner? Then your weighing and rating ones service over that of another. Personally I think any recipient of an action or honor medal ie; Silver Star, MOH or Purple Heart should be given priority. These statements of yours contradict each other. In the first sentence, you say that someone's service should not be rated over another but then you say people should be given priorities based on medals earned. There are MANY veterans who did MANY courageous things (men and women) who did not earn a medal for one reason or another. Why would they rate any less? In addition, 38 WASPS lost their lives serving our country. Should they be rated less than someone else who lost their life serving our country? Also, these WASPS are asking to have their ashes interred which would have minimal impact on capacity. As for running out of spaces, this is happening to a lot of cemeteries. Arlington recently celebrated 150 years of existence. Given how many soldiers were lost during the Civil War, WWI, WWII, Korea, and Vietnam, it is not surprising at all that it is filling up. The US is a relatively young country. It would be interesting to hear from some of our members from other countries. I am sure they also have cemetery issues. ...Kat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infidelparatrooper Posted March 19, 2016 Share #10 Posted March 19, 2016 I may be a bit off on this, but I think Arlington has made many changes due to demand/space constraints over the years. According to the current guidelines there are many veterans who are ineligible, not just WASPs. Criteria include active status, retired status, awards, holding public office etc... Scott. This is correct, any veteran that wishes to be buried in Arlington has to meet specific requirements. http://www.arlingtoncemetery.mil/Funerals/Scheduling-a-Funeral/Establishing-Eligibility Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cutiger83 Posted September 8, 2016 Author Share #11 Posted September 8, 2016 May she RIP. Thanks so much for her service and all of the other WASPS who served our country during WWII. http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/09/07/492954680/female-wwii-pilot-is-finally-laid-to-rest-at-arlington-national-cemetery Female WWII Pilot Is Finally Laid To Rest At Arlington National CemeteryWorld War II pilot Elaine Harmon, who died last year at the age of 95, wanted to be laid to rest with her fellow veterans at Arlington National Cemetery. And on Wednesday, Harmon's wish was fulfilled — thanks to a dedicated effort by her family and a law passed by Congress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now