DogTCollect Posted August 20, 2015 Share #1 Posted August 20, 2015 I saw this one on a forum what do u guys think about this one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teamski Posted August 20, 2015 Share #2 Posted August 20, 2015 Looks perfectly good to me.....except it has no tongue...... -Ski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogTCollect Posted August 20, 2015 Author Share #3 Posted August 20, 2015 I saw a guy saying it is fake so i was curious what the usmf would say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doinworkinvans Posted August 20, 2015 Share #4 Posted August 20, 2015 gonna need a lot more and better pics than that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ocsfollowme Posted August 20, 2015 Share #5 Posted August 20, 2015 and of the reverse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogTCollect Posted August 20, 2015 Author Share #6 Posted August 20, 2015 ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogTCollect Posted August 20, 2015 Author Share #7 Posted August 20, 2015 ...k Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgtdorango Posted August 20, 2015 Share #8 Posted August 20, 2015 I think the guy saying it is fake is just a keyboard commando stirring up trouble because over on waf and other forums even here on usmf people have deemed his helmet a fake that he has been posting pics of, he might be a helmet faker or just a disgruntled guy who doesnt want to believe he has a fake helmet so he is trying to cause trouble is how im seeing it...mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BILL THE PATCH Posted August 21, 2015 Share #9 Posted August 21, 2015 It's ww2era, just a miss stich. No tongue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vintageproductions Posted August 21, 2015 Share #10 Posted August 21, 2015 I believe this patch is out of Bob Carter or Tom Kibler ( spelling) collections. One of them posted it on WAF. The one poster said it was fake. Somebody with a Hispanic last name corrected him, and the guy went on a racial tirade instantly. Needless to say the thread was edited and cleaned up quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BROBS Posted August 21, 2015 Share #11 Posted August 21, 2015 looks right from what I know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X_redcatcher Posted August 22, 2015 Share #12 Posted August 22, 2015 Just like what everyone said, it's real but just a mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Carter Posted August 23, 2015 Share #13 Posted August 23, 2015 It's mine, it's a manufacturers flaw and as I pointed out in the original thread there are many flaws out there including patches missing eyes and so forth that were still issued and worn - as discussed above for some reason or another someone decided to use that thread to tell us how much more he knew than everyone else and try and insult everyone who disagreed with him. His gripe with it was the color of the beak, not paying any attention to the detail of the stitching which IMO would be a lot harder to replicate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jw1969 Posted August 24, 2015 Share #14 Posted August 24, 2015 I have the same in my collection. Indeed a good one,and as everyone stated, a manufacturer's error. H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now