Jump to content
Misfit 45

Colonial Revolutionary War bayonet

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I usually post on the edged weapons forum, but thought I might have more interested parties here.

I bought this bayonet as an American copy of the Brown Bess type bayonet circa 1775. The resemblance is certainly there. I'd like to see if someone has any thoughts about this bayonet as to whether or not they agree about the authenticity. Unlike the Brown Bess, the socket is only 2 3/4" long. The ID is approx. 7/8". The blade length from shoulders to tip is 12 1/2". Thanks for any input you have.

Marv

post-26996-0-08854700-1421726851.jpg

post-26996-0-34567800-1421726870.jpg

post-26996-0-73609200-1421726891.jpg

post-26996-0-09902300-1421726943.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks good to me. Other bayonet experts may have more to say. What is the diameter? Is it big enough for a .77 cal weapon or smaller for .69?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks good to me. Other bayonet experts may have more to say. What is the diameter? Is it big enough for a .77 cal weapon or smaller for .69?

 

Thanks for responding. As I said, the inside diameter is approx. 7/8 of an inch. As with many of these old bayonets, the socket is somewhat irregular. With a caliper, the diameter varies from about .830 to .860.

Marv

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My take would be .69 caliber at the outside. Based on the socket and blade length, could be for an Officer's fusil. Those were often more in the .65 caliber range.


worldbayonets.com | Bayonet Collector's Network (BCN) | Society of American Bayonet Collectors | NRA Life Member

 

Follow us on Facebook! facebook.com/worldbayonets

 

The bayonet cannot be abolished for the reason, if for no other, that it is the sole and exclusive embodiment of that willpower which, alone, both in war and everyday life, attains its object.General M. I. Dragomirov

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you be comfortable in dating this bayonet in the "colonial/revolutionary" period? Anyone?

Marv

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would concur with marysdad. I'd say this is an officers fusil bayonet. It would be very difficult to say if this is American or British . Some British examples are unmarked as well. Standard length of typical bayonet would be 21 1/2. It looks to be of the period but without any markings it is difficult to say with certainty. Similar bayonets were used up through the War of 1812 and beyond.

 

Great reference book:

http://www.trackofthewolf.com/Categories/PartDetail.aspx/294/1/BOOK-TSB

 

Check this out as well. Don Troiani has one of the best private collections in the US. It's a searchable site:

http://www.historicalimagebank.com/

 

Last suggestion would be this old reference but good:

http://www.amazon.com/Swords-Blades-American-Revolution-Neumann/dp/1880655004

 

I have two originals myself and one is a Fusil bayonet like yours. Very similar in length.

 

Good luck.


"May God have mercy upon my enemies because I won't"
"It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived"
"Americans will not tolerate a loser"
-- General George S. Patton Jr.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Memoriam: Private First Class Vincent J. Zabbia

Company K, 3rd Battalion, 18th Infantry Regiment, 1st Infantry Division

Wounded in Action: 30 March 1943 Hill 574 El Guettar, Tunisia

Died of Wounds: 9 April 1943

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since this bayonet has so much smaller dimensions than a regular Brown Bess bayonet, I had not considered that it might be an Officer's fusil bayonet. With that in mind I contacted Jeff Hayes who has a great Brown Bess web site. http://jeffreyhayes.com/bayonets/master_index1.htm After sending him more pictures, he agreed that it was an Officer's fusil bayonet and dated it to between 1755-1768, the time period in which this bayonet was made.

Thanks for leading me in the right direction.

Marv

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have always been told when you flick the blade with your finger the sound should be "thud". Modern re pros will ping or ring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have always been told when you flick the blade with your finger the sound should be "thud". Modern re pros will ping or ring.

 

Are you talking about Revolutionary war bayonets, or does that include Civil War bayonets? Be that as it may, I would say that when I hang the socket of my angular bayonets by one finger, and flick the blade with the fingernail of my other hand, only one bayonet actually made a thud sound. That was an 1842 conversion bayonet. The others made variations of tink ring type sounds.

Marv

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The different sound is due to the hardened steel tip welded to the softer iron body, collar and socket. Sorry to jump onto a really old post, but I wasn't on here then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.