4th Miss Cav Posted November 24, 2014 Share #26 Posted November 24, 2014 Plate is a model 1851 sword belt plate with an applied wreath. I think it might be Indian War era, nice either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Rogers Posted November 25, 2014 Share #27 Posted November 25, 2014 One thing that bothers me about the cavalry insignia is that it seems to be the 1858 sized crossed sabers rather than the 1872. Can you lay a ruler next to it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhill13 Posted November 26, 2014 Author Share #28 Posted November 26, 2014 Hopefully this pic will help Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Rogers Posted November 26, 2014 Share #29 Posted November 26, 2014 As other posts have indicated, the use of the company letter alone with the crossed sabers was regulation from 1873 until 1877 when the use of a regimental numeral was specified. At that time the number was to be above and the company letter below. From 1873 to 1877 the position of the company letter seems to have varied, at least I have seen them in both positions in photos. The use of the pin and the solder fill on the reverse is a custom element, as is the use of a conjoined letter and branch insignia. It does not seem uncommon in the period, however. A number of examples are shown in Langellier, Army Blue, etc. I also attach a jpeg of an 1872 campaign hat with original insignia on the upturned brim that I pulled from a NJ estate years ago (though whether it was a federal or state piece is another question.) It had the same elements: conjoined letter above, pin back, solder (or partial solder, I can't remember) fill. I asked about the dimensions, which indicate 1872 style of insignia, because fakers have produced a lot of CW style insignia with conjoined letters and numerals. I expect the letter on yours is 5/8 inch tall. As a side note, I think the belt plate is a good wartime officer's plate with silver washed wreath rather than a separately applied German silver wreath as is correct for an enlisted man's plate. The die work on the officer's plates is usually finer than the enlisted varieties and the wreaths were silvered, as were sometimes the stars, but silver would usually be a thin wash that has worn off, so not many are as well preserved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RelicHunter99 Posted November 26, 2014 Share #30 Posted November 26, 2014 The 1858 and 1872 model cavalry insignia are very different in appearance. The curvature of the blades, the handles, and the scabbard pieces are all different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Rogers Posted November 28, 2014 Share #31 Posted November 28, 2014 I take your point on the curvature of the blades- the 1872 tend to be more curved, but with a half-dozen or so different die strikes of CW cav insignia and the vagaries of photography, I think the size is the quickest determining factor for dating the government issue pieces. I don't see that much difference in scabbards or guards, but I don't have all the CW variants in front of me, and of course my eyes aint what they used to be. In any case, being the 1872 style insignia showing a known variation, this one stands a much better chance of being real than if it were one of the CW style flooding online auctions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now