emccomas Posted November 27, 2012 Author Share #301 Posted November 27, 2012 That does make it a bit more interesting. I appreciate your assistance. So, just to make it clear to all, we are looking for evidence of type of Medal of Honor awarded for: Ora Graves - There is a1957 photo of Graves wearing 5 point star MOH Osmond Kelly Ingram Charles Hammann Francis (Frank) Ormsbee William Corry Weedon Osborne (fake TC in possession of Navy Museum) - headstone has image of Tiffany Cross William R. Huber Carlton B. Hutchins Patrick McGunigal Also still need copy of evidence of Tiffany Cross for: Alexander Lyle Matej Kocak Ernest Janson (aka Charles Hoffman) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emccomas Posted November 27, 2012 Author Share #302 Posted November 27, 2012 OK, a bit more info on Patrick McGunigal. Date of action is Sep 17, 1917. Date of award is Nov 7, 1917 by General Order 341 of 1917. Tiffany Cross was not available until 1919. McGunigal's headstone also has image of 5 point star MOH. Very likely that McGunigal received the 5 point star version of the MOH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick536 Posted November 27, 2012 Share #303 Posted November 27, 2012 Upward and onward - Ora Graves - non-combat award 1917 Francis (Frank) Ormsbee - non-combat award 1918 William Corry - non-combat award 1920 William R. Huber - non-combat award 1928 Carlton B. Hutchins - non-combat award 1938 Patrick McGunigal - non-combat award 1917 Osmond Kelly Ingram - combat, posthumous Charles Hammann - combat award Weedon Osborne - combat award Alexander Lyle - combat award Matej Kocak - combat award Ernest Janson (aka Charles Hoffman) - combat award Presuming that the Navy only broke its rules twice (Byrd and Bennett), Graves, Ormsbee, Corry, Huber, Hutchins and McGunigal are not strong candidates. Mick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emccomas Posted November 27, 2012 Author Share #304 Posted November 27, 2012 Upward and onward - Ora Graves - non-combat award 1917 Francis (Frank) Ormsbee - non-combat award 1918 William Corry - non-combat award 1920 William R. Huber - non-combat award 1928 Carlton B. Hutchins - non-combat award 1938 Patrick McGunigal - non-combat award 1917 Osmond Kelly Ingram - combat, posthumous Charles Hammann - combat award Weedon Osborne - combat award Alexander Lyle - combat award Matej Kocak - combat award Ernest Janson (aka Charles Hoffman) - combat award Presuming that the Navy only broke its rules twice (Byrd and Bennett), Graves, Ormsbee, Corry, Huber, Hutchins and McGunigal are not strong candidates. Mick Agreed. Lyle, Kocak, and Janson Tiffany Cross medals have been observed in the past (photos, on display, etc), so we are pretty certain about those being Tiffany Cross recipients. I just don't have a copy of the actual evidence. Osborne headstone has image of TC on it, and Navy has a fake TC engraved with his name (TC is cast, and engraving style is completely wrong). Hammann headstone has a 5 point star emblem on it. The award of the MOH to Hammann MAY have taken place in 1918 (date of action is 8/21/1918). Hammann died on 6/14/1919. If award was made in 1918, then a star MOH would have been presented. Stll checking. Good info, keep it coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick536 Posted November 28, 2012 Share #305 Posted November 28, 2012 New Candidate: Donald L. Truesdale (sometimes Truesdell) USMC - combat - 1932. Same time as Schlit. Mick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emccomas Posted November 28, 2012 Author Share #306 Posted November 28, 2012 OK, tell me what medals this USMC guy is wearing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick536 Posted November 28, 2012 Share #307 Posted November 28, 2012 Hi Ed - This page: https://www.mcu.usmc.mil/historydivision/pages/Whos_Who/Truesdell_DL.aspx Led me to this page: http://www.medals.org.uk/nicaragua/nicaragua004.htm The one you question is the Nicaragua Cross of Valor. ;-) Bummer. Mick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick536 Posted November 28, 2012 Share #308 Posted November 28, 2012 And reading the citation, Truesdell was not involved in combat at the moment. Mick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emccomas Posted November 29, 2012 Author Share #309 Posted November 29, 2012 As a side note, Truesdell's MOH was one of the 7 that was stolen from the CMOHS on the USS Yorktown. There is another thread on the Forum (Medal of Honor Engraving) that has a picture of a replacement (duplicate) MOH for Turesdell. This is the one that was stolen in 2004. http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/index.php?/topic/38618-medal-of-honor-engraving/page__view__findpost__p__404245__hl__truesdell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Costa Posted December 3, 2012 Share #310 Posted December 3, 2012 Truedale was presented with a Star. I have a photo of the actual presentation. There is no known instance of a Star recipient receiving a TC later. Whereas we know of at least three instances where TC recipients requested and were given Stars after the TC was made absolete in 1942. All indications are that only 3 TC were presented to NON-WWI MOH recipients -- Byrd Bennett and Schilt. All others were for WWI actions. I believe we can eliminate ALL further non-WWI recipients. The total of 28 actually came from the fact that early research on the WWI MOH stated that ALL WWI men received TC's -- hence the number 28 which were the USN men and the 8 USMC men. It was thought in the 1950's that all 28 WWI recipients got a TC when we know that just was not so. Old legends die hard. MCGunigal was known to received only a star. And several books make mention of the fact that he did NOTreceive a TC. Hamman is most assuredly have received a TC but still looking for that elusive photo of the medal. Mark Costa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emccomas Posted December 3, 2012 Author Share #311 Posted December 3, 2012 Truedale was presented with a Star. I have a photo of the actual presentation. There is no known instance of a Star recipient receiving a TC later. Whereas we know of at least three instances where TC recipients requested and were given Stars after the TC was made absolete in 1942. All indications are that only 3 TC were presented to NON-WWI MOH recipients -- Byrd Bennett and Schilt. All others were for WWI actions. I believe we can eliminate ALL further non-WWI recipients. The total of 28 actually came from the fact that early research on the WWI MOH stated that ALL WWI men received TC's -- hence the number 28 which were the USN men and the 8 USMC men. It was thought in the 1950's that all 28 WWI recipients got a TC when we know that just was not so. Old legends die hard. MCGunigal was known to received only a star. And several books make mention of the fact that he did NOTreceive a TC. Hamman is most assuredly have received a TC but still looking for that elusive photo of the medal. Mark Costa Hey Mark; Welcome back. Progress continues to be made, slowly but surely. We are down to looking for proof for the last few. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emccomas Posted December 3, 2012 Author Share #312 Posted December 3, 2012 THe one that is really puzzling me is Osmond Kelly Ingram. He is from my neck of the woods (Alabama) but I can't seem to find anything about what happened to his MOH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Costa Posted December 3, 2012 Share #313 Posted December 3, 2012 THe one that is really puzzling me is Osmond Kelly Ingram. He is from my neck of the woods (Alabama) but I can't seem to find anything about what happened to his MOH. Ingram almost assuredly was presented with a TC. The reasoning behind my deduction is that his medal was presented at the same ceremony with other Combat Action TC's. Every other man presented with combat MOH's that day, received a TC. It just makes sense that he too received a TC as his actions were also for combat. BUT that is just a deduction no matter how much sense it makes. Who would have thought that Byrd and Bennett would have been presented with TC's ?? No one to this day knows why they received them. My guess is that the TC's were only ones available to Coolidge for the presentation and no one knew any better to acquire the star version instead. Mark Costa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emccomas Posted December 3, 2012 Author Share #314 Posted December 3, 2012 Ingram almost assuredly was presented with a TC. The reasoning behind my deduction is that his medal was presented at the same ceremony with other Combat Action TC's. Every other man presented with combat MOH's that day, received a TC. It just makes sense that he too received a TC as his actions were also for combat. BUT that is just a deduction no matter how much sense it makes. Who would have thought that Byrd and Bennett would have been presented with TC's ?? No one to this day knows why they received them. My guess is that the TC's were only ones available to Coolidge for the presentation and no one knew any better to acquire the star version instead. Mark Costa I concur with your analysis, but some sort of proof would be nice. I haven't given up. I am trying to track down family members now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick536 Posted December 10, 2012 Share #315 Posted December 10, 2012 Revisiting John Otto Siegal -- We have the picture of his engraved TC, so he got it. We also have his citation: For extraordinary heroism while serving on board the Mohawk in performing a rescue mission aboard the schooner Hjeltenaes which was in flames on 1 November 1918. Going aboard the blazing vessel, Siegel rescued 2 men from the crew's quarters and went back the third time. Immediately after he had entered the crew's quarters, a steam pipe over the door bursted, making it impossible for him to escape. Siegel was overcome with smoke and fell to the deck, being finally rescued by some of the crew of the Mohawk who carried him out and rendered first aid. Not combat action, unless there is more to the story. So, are there more recipients than Bennett, Byrd and Siegal out there who got the TC, yet not combat related? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firefighter Posted December 10, 2012 Share #316 Posted December 10, 2012 After thinking about it and looking at the rack again and again.Shouldn't the GC be after the Navy Cross? Maybe the GC was originally the French Legion de Honneur and the medal was missing and somebody threw on the GC? Foreign medals are mounted last. Just a thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emccomas Posted December 11, 2012 Author Share #317 Posted December 11, 2012 After thinking about it and looking at the rack again and again.Shouldn't the GC be after the Navy Cross? Maybe the GC was originally the French Legion de Honneur and the medal was missing and somebody threw on the GC? Foreign medals are mounted last. Just a thought. I am not sure what you are commenting on. Can you clarify. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emccomas Posted December 11, 2012 Author Share #318 Posted December 11, 2012 Revisiting John Otto Siegal -- We have the picture of his engraved TC, so he got it. We also have his citation: For extraordinary heroism while serving on board the Mohawk in performing a rescue mission aboard the schooner Hjeltenaes which was in flames on 1 November 1918. Going aboard the blazing vessel, Siegel rescued 2 men from the crew's quarters and went back the third time. Immediately after he had entered the crew's quarters, a steam pipe over the door bursted, making it impossible for him to escape. Siegel was overcome with smoke and fell to the deck, being finally rescued by some of the crew of the Mohawk who carried him out and rendered first aid. Not combat action, unless there is more to the story. So, are there more recipients than Bennett, Byrd and Siegal out there who got the TC, yet not combat related? That appears to be correct. The action apparently occurred in Norfolk, VA area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firefighter Posted December 11, 2012 Share #319 Posted December 11, 2012 I think the order of the medals are wrong.It should be, MOH, NC, GCM, Cuban Pac, WW1 Vic, Then possibly a French Legion of Honor.So I am thinking that maybe the last medal was originally the French Legion of Honor and for some reason somebody replaced it with the Navy GC planchet? Just a wild guess.If so the recipient would have been an officer. Does that make sense??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emccomas Posted December 11, 2012 Author Share #320 Posted December 11, 2012 I think the order of the medals are wrong.It should be, MOH, NC, GCM, Cuban Pac, WW1 Vic, Then possibly a French Legion of Honor.So I am thinking that maybe the last medal was originally the French Legion of Honor and for some reason somebody replaced it with the Navy GC planchet? Just a wild guess.If so the recipient would have been an officer. Does that make sense??? If you are referring to the Truesdale photo in post #306, the medals are as follows: Naval Medal of Honor (around neck) Top row: USMC Expeditionary Medal (I think) 2nd Nicaragua Campaign Medal USMC Good Conduct Medal Bottom Row: Nicaragua Cross of Valor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick536 Posted December 11, 2012 Share #321 Posted December 11, 2012 That appears to be correct. The action apparently occurred in Norfolk, VA area. Makes false then the assumption that only Bennett and Byrd are the outliers. I'd think that the "possibles" must again include those in the right date range for whom definitive observation still is lacking. Count on the Navy to not follow its rules . The "probables" remain those with combat citations. Mick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emccomas Posted December 11, 2012 Author Share #322 Posted December 11, 2012 Part of this discussion centers on the date of the action, and the date of the award. Siegel's action was 1 Nov 1918; WWI was still "officially" going on (until 11/11/1918 - 10 days later). Probably more important is the date of the award. I am not sure what the date of Siegel's award was, but if clearly fell within the dates that the TC was available. I have not eliminated anyone from consideration until I have some definitive information. Any Navy or Marine personnel that were awarded the MOH between 1919 and 1942 are "possibles". I am not focusing on the "combat" vs. "non-combat" designation, since these lines were clearly ignored in some cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emccomas Posted December 11, 2012 Author Share #323 Posted December 11, 2012 If the date of award was before the Tiffany Cross was available, then the MOH type by default has to be the star version, correct? Patrick McGunigal was awarded MOH on 11/7/1917 (GO 341, 1917) so this award had to be a star version. Ora Graves was awarded MOH in 1918 (GO 366, 1918) so this award had to be a star version. There is a 1957 picture of Graves wearing the star MOH. Jesse Covington was awarded MOH in 1918 (GO 403, 1918), so this award had to be a star version. There is a picture of Covington wearing the star MOH. John MacKenzie was awarded MOH in 1918 (GO 391, 1918), so this award had to be a star version. There is a picture of the Upton MOH showing the engraving. Frank Upton was awarded MOH in 1918 (GO 403, 1918), so this award had to be a star version. There is a picture of Covington wearing the star MOH. Francis Ormsbee was awarded MOH in 1918 (GO 436, 1918) so this award had to be a star version. Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick536 Posted December 12, 2012 Share #324 Posted December 12, 2012 Patrick McGunigal - non-combat award 1917 Ora Graves - non-combat award 1917 Jesse Covington - non-combat award 1918 John MacKenzie - non-combat award 1917 Frank Upton - non-combat award 1918 Francis (Frank) Ormsbee - non-combat award 1918 Aligns with your conclusions. Ingram's award was posthumous, and Find a Grave says he was buried at sea. Interestingly, his Find a Grave entry has a Tiffany Cross image posted. I've emailed the poster to see why he may have made that choice. ...Mick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emccomas Posted December 12, 2012 Author Share #325 Posted December 12, 2012 11 Naval / USNC men were awarded the MOH on Nov 11,1920. They are: James J. Madison - confirmed TC recipient Alexander Lyle - confirmed TC recipient Edouard Izac - confirmed TC recipient Orlando Petty - confirmed TC recipient Daniel Sullivan - confirmed TC recipient Charles Hamman - uncorfirmed type of MOH Ralph Talbot - confirmed TC recipient John Balch - confirmed TC recipient David Hayden - confirmed TC recipient Osmond Ingram - unconfirmed type of MOH Robert Robertson - confirmed TC recipient 9 of the 11 are confirmed TC recipients. It is reasonable to suspect that the other two are also TC recipients. I have a lead on the family of Osmond Ingram that may help with this. Stay tuned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now