Jump to content

artu44

Members
  • Content Count

    2,383
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About artu44

  • Rank
    MODERATOR EMERITUS

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://

Profile Information

  • Location
    South Liguria - Italy

Recent Profile Visitors

1,563 profile views
  1. My "russian" mag pouch has a big US stencil on the back side. Of course seller was the guilty one.
  2. I have a gunner one but shipping from is a nightmare of money.
  3. Well, it's possible that the idea of a gunner replacement would have been dropped later but why to name a belt 2nd assistant if the 1st doesn't exsist. They should have named it simply "assistant belt".
  4. If I remember well what late Carter Rila said, the first assistant doesn't exsist belt cause the guy wore a gunner belt being his duty to pick up the gun if gunner would have killed or wounded. The second assistant with its '03 covered the whole crew and bandoleers completed the need of ammos.
  5. Being 1944 Warrens dated, it should be a 1945. Late WWI production.
  6. Being the belt absolutely legit, keepers were replaced in the past. Original keepers were tin soldered on the back so take a look.
  7. If keepers are made out of copper it's a 1941, if brass is an early 1942.
  8. The buckle is the early WWII type but it looks rusted as it would have be made out of iron while all buckles of that period are made out of blachened brass.
  9. There is only one fake stencil on the Yale and it's easily detectable by odd font.
  10. I'm not too sure hook was removed. If so it leaves some marks on leather. Check for it. I had a mint 1943 Craighead M1916 which never got an hook. Workers sometimes are sleeping.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.