Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ranger-1972

  1. Notice on the 6 April 1948 color photo of the return to the Capitol of the national flag which had flown there on 7 Dec 1941, and then been raised over Rome, Berlin, and Tokyo, that the Army colonel on the far right (with back to the camera) is wearing riding breeches and riding boots with spurs. The other officers in the same row on the steps of the Capitol all have on Military District of Washington SSI, and I presume he does as well - though I cannot blow up the picture with enough clarity to be sure. Below is a photo from the other side of the Capitol, showing the officer on the right. His SSI seems to be the Allied Force HQ patch (white AF on a blue background in a red circle). In 1938, breeches were eliminated except for soldiers performing mounted duties (horse cavalry and horse artillery). Once the cavalry and horse artillery were motorized / mechanized in 1942, breeches / riding boots were no longer authorized. (Exceptions for general officers, like Patton, and for the US Constabulary in occupied Germany). None of the officers are wearing Sam Browne belts, which had also been phased out at the start of the war.
  2. Here is a color newsreel film of MacArthur showing the flag raising at the reopened US Embassy in Tokyo in September 1945. https://archive.org/details/42874MacarthurFootage
  3. Here is a link to a color newsreel film taken during the flag raising in Berlin in July 1945. http://footage.framepool.com/en/shot/356885643-henry-l-stimson-george-patton-flag-ceremony-lucius-clay
  4. On 7 Dec 1941, a Congressman from Texas introduced a motion that the flag flying over the Capitol was to be preserved - and flown over Tokyo once the U.S. had defeated them. When Germany and Italy declared war on the United States, the motion was amended to include Rome and Berlin. This flag was subsequently raised over Rome (on 4 July 1944), Berlin (on 25 July 1945), and Tokyo (in September 1945) - as each was occupied by the U.S. Army. President Truman raised the flag over what later became Clay Kaserne in Berlin when he was in the city for the Potsdam Conference. In this photo (6 Apr 1948), "men of the Third Infantry Division [should read 3rd Inf Regiment], all World War II veterans, present the flag at the Capitol Plaza, Washington, D.C. It is being accepted by Senator Arthur Vandenberg." The flag was 'lost' for several years, but later recovered and is now in the Smithsonian. Second photo (25 Jul 1945) shows Truman, Stimson, Eisenhower, Bradley, Patton, etc. at the flag raising ceremony in Berlin. Third photo (4 Jul 1944) shows the flag being raised in Rome. Fourth photo (early Sept 1945) shows the 1st Cavalry Division raising the flag over the reopened US Embassy in Tokyo. It was not the 'first US flag' raised in Tokyo after the war - that was done several days earlier (3 Sept) by LT Bud Stapleton, who was chewed out by MacArthur for upstaging his planned event. See last image for that 'first' flag raising in Tokyo.
  5. Captain Roger Donlon was the first Medal of Honor winner in Vietnam. (He also was the reviewing officer for the annual parade of the 1st Junior ROTC Brigade in El Paso, TX in 1968. Back then, JROTC was mandatory for all high school students in Texas - for at least two years. The 1st JROTC Brigade had 11 battalions of cadets -- one for each high school in El Paso. There was another JROTC Brigade in Ysleta, TX -- just to the south of El Paso -- which had another 10 battalions of cadets. Different times.)
  6. Thanks -- great information.
  7. Noticed that MG Miles is wearing his old colonel's overcoat in both photos (with 5 rows of braid on the sleeve) and a non-regulation sword belt / slings. He also has a distinctive collar trim on the second photo. You cannot see the cuff braid in that photo. In the painting below of LTG Miles, he has clearly designed his own cuff and collar braid, and his own shoulder knots. In the second photo, LTG Miles is wearing a unique white M1902 visor cap (with just two stars above the eagle, even though he was a 3-star at that point) with his full-dress blue uniform. In the third photo, LTG Miles is wearing a unique blue M1902 visor cap (with three stars above the eagle). He clearly didn't have any objection to designing his own unique uniform items.
  8. There is an interesting helmet for sale on e-Bay. It is an early M1881 body style but with the M1872 eagle plate & plume socket, as well as the chain-link rosette side buttons for the chin chain (all with heavy white-gold gilt). Heavy gold braided cords on the helmet. It has 2 stars affixed to the front of the eagle plate, and the name Nelson A. Miles embossed in gold on the inside of the helmet. It has a white feather plume in the M1872 plume holder, rather than the authorized yak tail plume. Regular cloth lining found in officer's helmets of the period. This could be dismissed out of hand, as the 1881 uniform regulations said that the new model helmet was for wear by all personnel except general officers and general staff officers -- but for a couple of tantalizing details. The first is that then-Colonel Nelson A. Miles headed up the 1878-79 Army Equipment Board that recommended what became the M1881 helmet, and he remained engaged in the process of approving that helmet over the next several years. The second is that the first samples of the "new" helmet (made both by Henry V. Allien and and Horstman) used the M1872 helmet plate and plume holder for the officer's model -- and the QM Depot cut down / repurposed existing M1872 version helmets to correspond to the new regulation. The third is that at least one of the initial photographs of the "new" helmet showed the chain-link rosette buttons and the M1872 plume / spike holder on top. Is it possible that Colonel Miles kept an early model and had it modified when he became a general officer (BG in Dec 1880 and MG in Apr 1890)? As mentioned above, Brevet MG Judson Kilpatrick (USMA '61) had one of the summer white helmets made up with two stars and rooster feathers for wear with his diplomatic uniform when he served as Minister (Ambassador) to Chile from May-December 1881. Generals were (and still are) given leeway in their own uniforms. I've seen photos of MG Miles wearing the regulation chapeau with his full-dress uniform and MG Miles wearing the M1895 full-dress visor cap with the full-dress uniform. Wonder if he kept/modified an early model of the helmet. If this helmet is authentic, then it is unique in every sense of that word.
  9. Here is a photo of the cold weather cap worn with the Army Service Uniform (same midnight blue color as the dress blue coat). The green version was worn with the old green Class A uniform & overcoat when not in formation (e.g., optional purchase). Wore this when attending ceremonies with the German Army in northern Germany in the dead of winter. Not stylish, but certainly beats frost-bitten ears! This is an issue item for the 3rd Infantry Regiment (The Old Guard) because they perform ceremonies outdoors in the middle of winter in their dress uniforms. Similar to issuing the Dress Blue Overcoat to The Old Guard. https://www.shopmyexchange.com/army-service-dress-cold-weather-hat-asu-/6356378
  10. Wider, deeper, flatter cap brim (1910-1912 timeframe). This is closer to the brim on the cap you have. Narrower, shallower, more vertical cap brim (1902 timeframe). This is closer to the brim on the cap 2LT Gordon is wearing. Both are more than 50 years later - but the Army didn't "waste" leather on big cap brims in the early years.
  11. The brim on the hat you have appears to be both 'wider' and 'longer' than the one on the hat Gordon is wearing. It's more like the M1912 version of the dress cap. Agree that the fabric colors are very vibrant for a hat that is more than 170 years old. That said, I have an officer's M1902 dress cap that looks like it just came off the shelf - complete with gold bullion eagle embroidered on the front of the cap that has absolutely no tarnish. The oldest 'original' military hat I've got is an 1872 staff officer's chapeau. The cloth & gold tassels are in excellent condition; only the ostrich feathers are a bit worse for the wear after 148 years.
  12. George H. Gordon, USMA '46 (classmate of Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson) was commissioned a brevet 2LT in the Mounted Rifles upon graduation. I've attached a 'flipped' copy of the photo of him wearing the wheel cap -- with the saber & sash on the officer's left and the jacket buttoning properly. You can compare the hat you have to the one in the Mexican War era photo. From the Cullum Register of USMA graduates (highlighted his Mexican War service; he went on to become a MG of Volunteers during the Civil War): Vol. II p291 1314 (Born Mas.) George Henry Gordon: Born July 19, 1823. Military History. — Cadet at the Military Academy, July 1, 1842, to July 1, 1846, when he was graduated and promoted in the Army to Bvt. Second Lieut., Mounted Rifles, July 1, 1846. Served: in garrison at Jefferson Barracks, Mo., 1846; in the War with Mexico, 1846‑47, being engaged in the Siege of Vera Cruz, Mar. 9‑29, 1847, — Battle of Cerro Gordo, Apr. 17‑18, 1847, where he was (Bvt. First Lieut., Apr. 18, 1847, for Gallant and Meritorious Conduct in the Battle of Cerro Gordo, Mex.) wounded, — Battle of Contreras, Aug. 19‑20, 1847, — Battle of Chapultepec, Sep. 13, 1847, — Assault and Capture of the City of Mexico, Sep. 13‑14, 1847, — and in a hand-to‑hand encounter with two guerrillas, near San Juan Bridge, Dec. 21, 1847, where he was severely wounded; on Recruiting service, 1848; on sick leave of absence, 1848‑49; at the (Second Lieut., Mounted Rifles, Jan. 8, 1848) Cavalry School for Practice, Carlisle, Pa., 1849‑50; on frontier duty at Ft. Vancouver, Wash., 1850‑51; in garrison at Newport Barracks, Ky., 1851; at the Cavalry School for Practice, Carlisle, Pa., 1852; on frontier duty at Ft. Scott, Kan., 1852‑53, — Ft. Leavenworth, Kan., 1853, — and (First Lieut., Mounted Rifles, Aug. 30, 1853) March to Laramie, Dak., 1853; and on Coast Survey, Mar. 9 to July 26, 1854. Resigned, Oct. 31, 1854.
  13. The insignia on the cap and collar appear to be that of the 4th Regiment of Field Artillery (Mountain), organized 13 June 1904 at Vancouver Barracks, Washington, under the command of COL Alexander B. Dyer, Jr. It consisted of a Headquarters and six firing batteries. A Battery (formed from the former 26th Battery); B Battery (formed from the former 28th Battery); C Battery (formed from the former 23rd Battery); D Battery (formed from the former 27th Battery); E Battery (organized June 1907); and F Battery (organized June 1907). The 4th Field Artillery served during the Mexican Punitive Expedition in 1916, but did not deploy to France during WWI.
  14. This appears to be the Field Artillery insignia adopted in 1904 (a caisson wheel on a disc, superimposed on the crossed cannon), rather than the Coast Artillery insignia (an artillery shell on a disc, superimposed on the crossed cannon). It would be very unusual for a Coast Artillery officer below the rank of Major to be mounted, whereas every Field Artillery officer would ride a horse.
  15. Thanks - that makes sense. WRT ribbons, I figured the Occupation ribbon (First Army HQ was initially slated to go from Europe to the Pacific to participate in Operation Downfall in 1946, but after 11 straight months in combat, many individuals transferred to Third Army or Ninth Army, rather than opt to fight another foe), the WWII Victory Medal ribbon, the American Theater ribbon, and the European Theater ribbon (with four stars - Normandy, Northern France, Rhineland, Ardennes-Alsace, and Central Europe). He might have earned a Bronze Star in Europe, especially if he was in one of the FA Groups under First Army Artillery. Likewise, he could have served in Korea -- but it seems unlikely he would wear a First Army patch on the right sleeve if he had been in combat in Korea. This officer could be Regular Army or AUS -- it wasn't until 1957 that Eisenhower RIFed all the AUS officers on active duty, realizing that in 1958 they would reach 18 years of Federal service (since Roosevelt's call up of the National Guard in 1940) and be locked in for retirement. If he had been a captain in WWII, chances are he was at least a major by 1953. If he had been a major in WWII, chances are he was a lieutenant colonel by 1953. If a company-grade officer, he probably was awarded an Army Commendation Medal at some time between when it was approved (Dec 1945) and 1953. The Meritorious Service Medal was not approved until 1968. If a field-grade officer, he may have been awarded a Legion of Merit (that was the only award above the ARCOM until 1968). Thanks again.
  16. In my original post, I indicated it was a M1942 jacket, which is not technically correct. The male officer's winter service uniform in 1941 consisted of a 4 button, 4 pocket coat of finer wool fabric in olive drab shade No. 51 ("dark-shade" i.e. a very dark forest green with brownish hue), nicknamed "greens". The coat was worn with a russet brown leather Sam Brown belt until 1942 when the leather belt was replaced by a cloth belt of matching fabric to the coat. Officers could wear trousers matching the color and fabric of the coat, or optionally they were allowed taupe colored, trousers, officially called "drab shade 54", of the same material as the coat, nicknamed "pinks", leading to the nickname "pinks and greens" for the iconic combination. Since 1939, the coats for officers and enlisted men had included a pair of pleats by each shoulder that gave extended freedom of movement to the wearer. It was suggested by the Office of the Quartermaster General (OQMG) that the bi-swing back could be eliminated to improve the appearance of the garment and to decrease the cost of manufacture and to save on wool. In June 1942 the "Revised Service Coat" was adopted. It no longer had the bi-swing back and the lower pockets became a simplified interior type with an exterior flap. This coat has the bi-swing pleats at the shoulders, the cloth belt, and the lower interior pockets with an exterior flap. The uniform set came with a matching pair of dark trousers (not the 'pinks'). So it seems to date from 1942.
  17. I acquired a M1942 officer's uniform (with the vented pleats at the back) worn by a field artillery officer who served with First Army in WWII. He obviously continued to wear the same uniform long after the war, because his overseas bars are on the right sleeve (which did not happen until 1953). The uniform has a First Army insignia on the right sleeve, and a Fourth Army insignia on the left sleeve. The right sleeve also has four overseas bars and a Meritorious Service Unit Insignia (wreath) - probably the one awarded to Fourth Army, since it did not serve in combat during WWII. First Army Artillery was led by BG Charles E. Hart, who wrote an article in Military Review in September 1945. The First Army Artillery consisted of the First Army Artillery Section (Hart plus 3 colonels, 2 lieutenant colonels, 5 majors, 4 captains, 2 lieutenants, 17 warrant officers, 40 enlisted men), the 32nd Field Artillery Brigade with two subordinate Field Artillery Groups (3rd FA Group and 11th FA Group), each with two FA battalions of 240mm howitzers (551st FA Bn, 552nd FA Bn, 742nd FA Bn & ??), and two additional separate FA battalions of 8" guns (153rd FA Bn and 268th FA Bn). These provided reinforcing fires to the Field Artillery Groups that were habitually associated with the corps of the First Army. The Corps-level Field Artillery Groups were equipped with 155mm howitzer battalions, 155mm gun battalions, 8" howitzer battalions, 4.5" gun battalions, and provided general support to the division artilleries. Presumably, officers who had served in Field Artillery Groups at the corps level would wear the corps' patch on their right sleeve, rather than the First Army patch. Unfortunately, the uniform only has the officer's initials -- not his full name -- so I cannot determine in which unit he served. In any case, I've found it very difficult to find the names of officers who served in the First Army Artillery Section (at HQ), the 32nd FA Brigade, the 3rd or 11th FA Groups, or the individual heavy artillery battalions. I'm trying to build the uniform to what it would have looked like in 1953. The surface-to-air missile was not adopted for wear by Field Artillery officers until 1958, so in 1953 this officer would still be wearing just the crossed cannon insignia on the lapels of his jacket. Officers who had served at the division artillery level frequently wore the regimental number above their crossed cannon. Does anyone know if that practice was also followed by officers who had served at the Army artillery level (e.g., crossed cannon with the numbers 32 above, for 32nd FA Bde -- or was that reserved for officers who had served in the 32nd FA Bn in North Africa & Europe)? Or a number 3 or 11 above, with the letters GP beneath, for the 3rd FA Group or 11th FA Group? Or would they have just worn the plain crossed cannon collar insignia? Thanks.
  18. What type of sword belt / cross-body sling was worn under the M1902 white, high-collar jacket when the officer was 'under arms'? I've got photos of officer wearing the white, high-collar jacket with trousers and with white riding breeches and boots -- all the while wearing a M1902 saber. The saber straps hang from an opening to the left side of the jacket. But there is no visible dark 'stripe' or 'bulge' around the officer's waist under the white jacket -- and one would think that wearing either the dress belt or the service belt & buckle would 'show' under the coat. Most officers in the interwar period (between the SAW and WWI) were graduates of USMA, VMI, Citadel, etc. As cadets, they had all worn a white canvas duck strap that went over the right shoulder, across the body, and down to a point at the left hip, just below the belt. The cadet saber's scabbard was hooked through a throg at the bottom (either leather or cloth). I've seen these advertised in the 1917 'military edition' of the Sears, Roebuck catalog. I know officers wore their normal sword belt under their blue M1902 dress coat (and wore the dress sword belt around the outside of the waist of their M1902 full-dress coat). Anyone know if Army officers wore those white duck straps under their M1902 white uniforms, and hooked the black saber straps onto the throg at the bottom? Or did they just wear the black belt under their white uniforms?
  19. On 26 July 1941, President Roosevelt issued a Presidential Order (6 Fed. Reg. 3825) calling "all the organized military forces of the Government of the Commonwealth of the Philippines" into the service of the U.S. armed forces. That same order promised U.S. citizenship and veteran's benefits to Filipinos who enlisted in the U.S. Army. About 250,000 Filipinos joined the ranks. Those living in the States were sworn in as citizens as soon as they enlisted. Those who joined in the Philippines were promised their citizenship at war's end. However, in 1946, President Truman signed the Rescission Act (Public Law 70-301), abrogating FDR's promise, declaring those who had joined the U.S. Army while living in the Philippines were not eligible for VA benefits. This was not corrected until 1990. More than 1,000,000 Filipinos died during WWII -- many at the hands of the Japanese (during their conquest and occupation of the islands in 1941-44) and many at the hands of the Americans (during the reconquest of the islands in 1944-45). In 1940, Manila was the sixth largest American city (the Philippine Islands, like the Hawaiian Islands, Alaska, the Panama Canal Zone, Puerto Rico, Guam, Wake and Midway were all U.S. territories at that time). The battle to capture Manila in Feb-Mar 1945 resulted in that city becoming the most heavily damaged 'allied' capital of the war (worse by far than London, Paris, Moscow, The Hague, or Brussels). During that battle, the U.S. lost 1,000+ KIA and 5,500+ WIA; the Japanese lost 16,000+ KIA; and there were an estimated 100,000+ Filipino civilians killed. Many of those died due to Japanese atrocities during the battle, but many others were killed by U.S. artillery fire and bombing raids. My dad participated in the campaigns on Leyte and Luzon, and was in Manila in 1945 preparing for the invasion of Japan when the war ended. His photos of Manila at that time are staggering. He said that he never saw a Filipino in Manila who smiled at an American. If Demetrio Bersalona (who was living in Los Angeles in 1940) enlisted in the Army while in the U.S. in 1941-42, then he may well have become a U.S. citizen at that time.
  20. What's interesting about this photo is that MG Scott is wearing the M1902 full-dress uniform for mounted officers, M1902 officer's saber, and the M1912 hat (with the wider crown), but he is wearing the M1872 version of a general officer's sword belt -- with the long strap from the center of the back of the belt and a short strap on the left side. Along with the M1902 uniform & saber was the M1902 sword belt -- which had a long & a short strap (fastened side by side) -- worn on the left hip. As a general officer, Scott was able to design his own uniform. First time I've seen the M1872 belt worn with a M1902 uniform. Also, this is a great closeup of the full-dress sword knot for general officers -- which is distinctly different from the sword knot for all other officers. Seems he has the field version of the saddle cloth, rather than the dress version -- even though he is wearing his full-dress uniform. The stars and the General Staff chevrac appear to be in a subdued finish, rather than bright silver for the stars and colored enamel for the GS insignia (as shown in the example at the top of this post). I would guess that this photo was taken on Ft Myer, VA, near Quarters #1 (General Leonard Wood was the first Army Chief of Staff to live there, beginning in 1910. Every Army Chief of Staff since then has lived there.) MG Scott lived there from 1914-1917. Interestingly, MG Scott personally negotiated the end of the Bluff War in Utah (March 1915), one of the last fights with native Americans involving the US Army.
  21. The Hathi Trust webpage is a great place to look for U.S. Army uniform regulations https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/006539002 Here is a .pdf of the Regulations for the Uniforms of the U.S. Army, 1917 https://history.army.mil/html/bookshelves/resmat/wwi/historical_resources/default/sec04/PDF/regulationsforun1917uniform.pdf There was no set of U.S. Army Uniform Regulations published in 1919. Bill Emerson lists the following for pre-WWI, WWI, post-WWI: 1911: Regulations for the Uniform of the United States Army, 26 Dec 1911. 1912 Specification for the Uniforms of the United States Army, 25 Jan 1912. 1913: Specification for the Uniforms of the United States Army, February 15, 1913. 1914: Regulations for the Uniform of the United States Army (Revised Edition), July 22, 1914. 1917: Special Regulations Number 41, Regulations for the Uniform of the United States Army, August 15, 1917; Special Regulations Number 42, Specifications for the Uniform of the United States, August 15, 1917. 1921: Army Regulations (AR) 600-35, 14 Oct 1921, Prescribed Service Uniform; AR 600-40, Sept 1921, Wearing of Service Uniform. 1924: AR 600-35, 25 Nov 1924, Prescribed Service Uniform. 1926: AR 600-35, 31 Dec 1926, Prescribed Service Uniform; AR 600-40, 31 Dec 1926, Wearing of Service Uniform.
  22. They are the correct trousers for wear with the high collar M1902 dress tunic and with the double-breasted M1902 full-dress coat. General officers wore dark blue trousers. Dismounted officers of the infantry, artillery, cavalry and engineers wore sky blue trousers; mounted officers wore sky blue breeches. The Regulations and Notes for the Uniform of the Army of the United States, 1902 prescribed as the dress uniform for officers a single-breasted sack coat of dark blue cloth or serge, with standing collar fastened with two hooks and eyes; coat to close with flap containing suitable concealed fastenings; slit not extending 3 inches for hooking up the saber; the skirt to extend from one-third to two-thirds the distance from the point of the hip to the bend of the knee, according to the height of the wearer; cut to fit the figure easily; a vertical opening at each side of the hip, according to pattern. The coat to be trimmed with lustrous flat black mohair braid 1 ¼ inches wide, as follows: Edged all around the bottom, the front edges, the collar, and for six inches upward from the bottom along both side openings of the skirt. Shoulder straps … and collar ornaments … will be worn with this garment. This was nearly identical to the 1895 service coat, except for the fact that the collar was fastened top & bottom in the center. Full-dress and dress trousers for officers of cavalry, artillery, infantry and engineers were identical: of sky-blue cloth with stripes 1 ½ inches wide, welted at the edges; the color of the stripes to be that of the facings of the respective corps or arms. Officers of the Corps of Engineers not attached to the engineer battalions were to wear dark-blue cloth trousers with the addition of a stripe of scarlet cloth 1 ½ inches in width with a piping of white cloth 1/8 inch in width. For officers of cavalry, artillery, infantry and engineers when mounted, full-dress and dress breeches of the same material and with the same colored stripes as their full-dress trousers were worn. Black shoes (or boots) were worn with the full-dress and dress uniform. The M1902 dress and full-dress uniforms were discontinued from 1917-1929, then worn again from 1929-1936.
  23. HQ 34th Artillery Brigade: 64th CA Regt (British 8"), 70th CA Regt (US-assembled British 8"), 71st CA Regt (British 8") - not in combat
  24. Another possibility: Charles Walter Machemehl (1922-2005), Texas A&M class of '44, was transferred to the Army OCS program in 1943 and commissioned in the Army that year. He served with the 82nd Airborne Division as a forward observer, participating in the Battle of the Bulge, the Ruhr Pocket, and the Battle of the Hurtgen Forest - and was in the unit that linked up with the Russian Army at the Elbe River in 1945. He received two Bronze Stars and a Silver Star. He later served in the 17th Airborne Division and ended the war as a Captain serving as the aide to General Matthew B. Ridgeway, 1st Allied Airborne Army. His son is my neighbor. See his obituary: https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/houstonchronicle/obituary.aspx?n=charles-walter-machemehl&pid=3538950
  25. Ref the E / 59th Artillery insignia, wonder if this is a post-WWI uniform from the 1920s. The 59th Coast Artillery Regiment was not demobilized after WWI - it went first to California, then to Washington, then to the Philippines. In about 1921, certain uniform items that had been authorized in France during WWI -- but forbidden for wear in the US -- were finally allowed to be worn. These included the Sam Browne belt for officers, and the divisional shoulder insignia. It might be that this individual was serving with the 59th Coast Artillery Regiment in the Philippines in 1921, and sewed on his WWI vintage 28th Division shoulder patch. Only problem with this scenario is that by 1921, the enlisted collar disc for the CAC included the shell within the lozenge at the intersection of the crossed cannon, and the lettered CAC companies (from WWI) were re-designated as numbered CAC companies (e.g., E battery, 59th CA Regt became the 252nd Company, 59th CA Regiment -- and it was inactive). From: https://cdsg.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/FORTS/CACunits/CACreg1.pdf The 59th Arty sailed from Brest, arriving New York 1-24-19, and moved to Cp. Upton, where NG and NA men were discharged 1-30-19. Initially 59th Arty was slated for the east coast with the 32nd Bde, but 59th was substituted for 56th Arty and transferred to 31st Bde at San Francisco. Btry C was inactivated prior to the transfer, its personnel reassigned to 2nd Co, CD SNY. The 59th Arty numbered only a few hundred RA officers and men when it arrived at Ft. Winfield Scott. It was at Ft. Winfield Scott from the latter part of February until 10-2-19, when 31st Bde was transferred to Cp. Lewis, WA. The 31st Bde and the 57th Arty Regt were demobilized in the summer of 1921, the personnel of the 57th were transferred to the brigade’s two remaining regiments, the 55th and the 59th Arty, enabling the 59th to bring HHB and Btrys A & B up to nominal peacetime strengths. The 59th was transferred to Ft. Mills on Corregidor Island, departing Ft. Lewis 7-13-21. On 8-1-21, while enroute to the Philippine Islands, 1st, 2nd & 3rd Bn HHD&CTs were organized 8-1-21 aboard the USAT Sherman from personnel of the regimental HHB. On 6-30-22, HHB, 59th Arty was additionally designated 98th Co, CAC; HHD 1st Bn, 248th Co, CAC; HHD 2nd Bn, 249th Co, CAC; HHD 3rd Bn, 250th Co, CAC. Btrys A, B, C, D, E, & F were additionally designated 176th, 252nd, 3rd, 254th, 255th, & 252nd Cos, CAC, with Btrys C through F inactive. The 59th Arty arrived at Manila 8-13-21 and was transported to Ft. Mills, Corregidor, that same date.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.