Jump to content

Pudgy (V)

Members
  • Content Count

    395
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Pudgy (V)

  1. That book is awesome. One of the best WWII books written. I liked it so much, I had to find a first edition myself. I actually found one that was signed personally by Eugene Sledge. I don't think there were that many books printed in the first edition, I think they are some what rare. Nobody ever thought that book would become part of a 10 part mini series.
  2. Ok, thanks guys! I had a feeling they might have been, just wanted to get other opinions.
  3. I purchased a bunch of squad patches and I wanted to see if they are originals or reproductions. Would like to get some profession opinions.
  4. That was going to be my next question. It looked like a theater made patch. Any ideas on a value?
  5. Does anyone know what this patch is? Thank-you for your help!
  6. Thank-you so much for the information. I'm not 100% sure if it is a CCB or a CCR. Are painted armored helmets uncommon, I don't recall seeing too many of them. I did a little research and found a discussion on how the CCR was used in WWII, since I didn't know anything about it. I found it to be pretty interesting and thought I would attach it for others to read. https://forums.armchairgeneral.com/forum/historical-events-eras/world-war-ii/armor-in-world-war-ii/w-allied-armor/115406-us-armored-division-ccr-use
  7. I purchased this helmet today, and I'm not sure who the paint represents. Could this be 3rd armor? It looks like there are letters on the three corners of the triangle. Possibly "C" "C" "P" The shell has an early 136 heat stamp along with 13-H-52 painted on the front. Would love to know some history on it. Thanks guys!
  8. If you took two unnamed USN helmets, both painted identical and no way of tracing either one of them. One has aged shellac, the other beautiful but not 100% sure it's original. I'm buying the one with shellac. Granted, it was altered, but I know it was preserved for a reason. I think this helmet is legit. With so many fakes out there, the ones with shellac might be the safer purchases. Just my two cents.
  9. Ok, maybe I'm missing something. If a helmet has shellac on it, wouldn't that help add to its authenticity? We know that was a common practice done by early collectors. You can tell it hadn't had shellac put on it recently. Personally, I think that makes it more legit.
  10. I love these things. They started as an A model and ended with an F model. I believe the F model was produced until sometime in late 1945 early 1946. From my experiences, there is an ink date stamped on the chassis somewhere. Since you have it out, it should be easy to find. Also, on the bottom of the chassis, where you insert the batteries, the plastic is marked BC 611- with a letter designation. In your instance it should be C. If it is, the chassis and shell might have been together for awhile anyway. The F models didn't always stamp an F on the chassis though.
  11. You guys are all missing the point.....don't get married. Every room in my house has militaria. Lol!
  12. I met a gentleman who was a long time collector who really knew his stuff, and he told me they were only made for one month. He even knew the month, I just don't remember what he said. I think I ran across that in one of my books also.
  13. I believe the textured St Clair's were only made a month.
  14. Nice lid!!! You need to get a bigger shelve and add a few more.
  15. Wow, what an amazing soldier. A true hero!!! Thanks for sharing Andy!!!
  16. That's a pretty cool picture. Thanks!!!
  17. That's interesting! Thanks for the information! I wondered if they were used much.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.