Jump to content


Photo

Mitchell Cover Contract List


  • Please log in to reply
39 replies to this topic

#26 patches

patches
  • Members
    • Member ID: 34,986
  • 23,005 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queens N.Y.C.

Posted 28 January 2014 - 10:56 AM

Or Dry Rot, I got a Sateen Cover once, thought I could rescue it with the old QM type Zig Zag back in forth machine stitching on the tears, which were a few here and there on the cover, but it was a no go, just to brittle with dry rot.



#27 WW2JAKE

WW2JAKE
  • Members
    • Member ID: 125,364
  • 4,546 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Arizona

Posted 28 January 2014 - 12:04 PM

its on a vietnam pot all original, but it tends to tear from simple things like you can mess with it and let people look at it and touch it with no problem then out of no where you slightly grab the helmet and it tears especially on the foliage slits and in between the 2 side tongues that go around the bails ive dealt with covers before but none have reacted like this before

Attached Images

  • my helmet1.jpg


#28 RustyCanteen

RustyCanteen

    ADMINISTRATOR

  • Administrators
    • Member ID: 24,355
  • 15,387 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth

Posted 28 January 2014 - 12:09 PM

It looks very nice. But it is likely a combination of age and storage which have rendered it brittle. Unfortunately there is no way to prevent it except to handle it as little as possible.

 

RC



#29 WW2JAKE

WW2JAKE
  • Members
    • Member ID: 125,364
  • 4,546 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Arizona

Posted 28 January 2014 - 12:13 PM

i think so i have a 1981 woodland cover which looks like its been to hell and back (was issued) and when i got it it had been sewn back together and i wasnt sure about it with this mitchell cover because its a different feeling when it tears if that makes sense



#30 Justin

Justin
  • Members
    • Member ID: 2,305
  • 10,285 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York.

Posted 30 January 2014 - 02:57 PM

You could always just take this cover off and replace it with a better one, should run you what? $12 dollars?

#31 WW2JAKE

WW2JAKE
  • Members
    • Member ID: 125,364
  • 4,546 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Arizona

Posted 30 January 2014 - 07:00 PM

online you cant find them for less than $25 i got this one for $10 at a military vehicle show but it only happens once a year other than that i cant find any local 



#32 2Dogs

2Dogs
  • Members
    • Member ID: 5,782
  • 1,200 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Virginia

Posted 29 September 2015 - 05:26 AM

What was the "Wear Out Date  for the Mitchell cover?   I remember seeing them worn in the field at Hood in 85-86.



#33 patches

patches
  • Members
    • Member ID: 34,986
  • 23,005 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queens N.Y.C.

Posted 23 February 2016 - 12:29 PM

What was the "Wear Out Date  for the Mitchell cover?   I remember seeing them worn in the field at Hood in 85-86.

I don't think there ever was a wear out date, like you I seen them too, at Benning, Hood and Wainwright early 80- late 82, and I'm sure everyone else who was in the Army in those days, AF and Marines too I,m thinking as well.


Edited by patches, 23 February 2016 - 12:29 PM.


#34 denfly

denfly
  • Members
    • Member ID: 126,332
  • 329 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 July 2018 - 06:50 PM

Anyone knows the date on this. I was guessing 79 but the label looks older.

Attached Images

  • s-l400.jpg


#35 sgtdorango

sgtdorango
  • Members
    • Member ID: 350
  • 12,352 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mass. USA

Posted 28 July 2018 - 02:42 AM

Interesting, ive never seen a white sewn tag on a woodland cover, can you show pics of the whole cover?...mike

#36 Cap Camouflage Pattern I

Cap Camouflage Pattern I
  • Members
    • Member ID: 153,751
  • 3,130 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oklahoma

Posted 28 July 2018 - 07:15 PM

Very strange, doesn't seem worth faking. Very interesting, thanks for sharing.

#37 pump 150

pump 150
  • Members
    • Member ID: 98,601
  • 573 posts

Posted 28 July 2018 - 07:58 PM

Yes, it would be interesting to see the whole cover please.  The D.P.S.C. name was in service from 1965-1998 so it would fall in line for 1979 if read that way.  If anyone can confirm that is the way these contract numbers are truly read I would be interested in knowing as it may very well change some thoughts in other areas as well.



#38 denfly

denfly
  • Members
    • Member ID: 126,332
  • 329 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 29 July 2018 - 11:09 AM

Here's some photos. From ebay seller item #263829823739. I too am curious.s-l64.jpg s-l500.jpg



#39 Edelweisse

Edelweisse
  • Members
    • Member ID: 153,915
  • 815 posts

Posted 29 July 2018 - 06:29 PM

Hi...normally what happens is the services awards contract for initial (newly designed) clothing and then they realize its too much trouble managing contracts so they pass the management of the NSN to DLA. This label looks off ...Defense Personnel Support Center normally has contracts beginning with DSA100 or DLA100 and now SPM and SPE...and as stated a white cloth label compared to an ink stamp...but I could be wrong because many were made but the label just looks off.

#40 pump 150

pump 150
  • Members
    • Member ID: 98,601
  • 573 posts

Posted 29 July 2018 - 09:53 PM

Thanks for the info, very interesting. Since the label may be off for a standard production contract my next question is as this would appear to might be from 1979 for any with knowledge...

With the “M-81 Woodland” being adopted in 1981 and it being essentially the ERDL Camo with the patterns enlarged during the later 1970’s, could this have been an early run of the new pattern under a limited contract with low volume numbers of uniforms and helmet covers made through D.P.S.C. for field trials or simulation testing possibly?


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users