Jump to content


USMC 1951 BOOTS

Started by Greg Robinson , Mar 15 2009 01:55 AM

  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

#21 baker502

baker502
  • Members
    • Member ID: 512
  • 1,737 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nunya

Posted 19 March 2009 - 11:05 AM

What kind of price range do they fall in, I see veryone is saying they are hard to find. does the price go up for size and date? Just curious that way I can keep my eyes peeled in my travels for set.. Thanks Paul

#22 collector

collector
  • Members
    • Member ID: 1,414
  • 599 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Northern California

Posted 19 March 2009 - 11:20 AM

These were twenty bucks.

Attached Images

  • post_1414_1234768604.jpg


#23 baker502

baker502
  • Members
    • Member ID: 512
  • 1,737 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nunya

Posted 19 March 2009 - 04:36 PM

ok here are the ones in question..Paul
003.JPG

#24 baker502

baker502
  • Members
    • Member ID: 512
  • 1,737 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nunya

Posted 19 March 2009 - 04:36 PM

002.JPG

#25 Greg Robinson

Greg Robinson

    Deceased Forum Co-Founder

  • IN MEMORIAM
    • Member ID: 4
  • 3,404 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Georgia USA

Posted 19 March 2009 - 04:43 PM

ok here are the ones in question..Paul


Contract date of 1962...and black laces.....late production.

Edited by Greg Robinson, 19 March 2009 - 04:44 PM.


#26 cajun100

cajun100
  • New Members
    • Member ID: 6,908
  • 4 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:northern California USA

Posted 15 June 2009 - 10:16 AM

After Korea, many regular and reserve outfits issued either boondockers (the hightop field shoes) or these boots. I received both in a reserve unit prior to active duty in the mid-fifties.

The boots were the roughout variety as were the boondockers. Gung-ho types later insisted on rubbing these down and spitshining them -- leading to everyone wanting a spare pair so these didn't go to the field.

The laces were cordovan. Both boots and boondockers had the beveled heel. The boon dockers were NOT the tan version used throughout WWII and into Korea -- they were the black color as well. We did not wear leggings with these, as they had previously. Rubber bands or string, and later more fancy "garters" were used to blouse dungarees over the boots.

Here is a picture of Camp Fuji environment circa 1957 showing the "styles" of the time -- mixed new and old dungarees, boots with shined quicklacing hooks. Sharp Corporal of the Guard, huh?

1957boots.jpg

#27 Andrei

Andrei
  • Members
    • Member ID: 467
  • 4,908 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:East Paris, France

Posted 15 June 2009 - 01:39 PM

Nice pic, Cajun !

#28 Bob Hudson

Bob Hudson

    Forum Co-Founder (Ret)

  • Administrators
    • Member ID: 2
  • 21,110 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 June 2012 - 06:15 PM

I have this pair which came from the estate of a 30-year Marine. I had photographed them with the intent of selling them on ebay, but I realized that while they are M1951 boots, they don't match! However, based on all that I got from this vet's family and how it was boxed and labeled, I suspect he may have worn them just like this.

1.jpg

2.jpg

5.jpg

3.jpg

4.jpg

#29 1st.marine.captain.17

1st.marine.captain.17
  • New Members
    • Member ID: 49,945
  • 26 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 July 2013 - 06:44 AM

Are there anybody, just anybody who knows where I can find one of these boots in size 10 - 11? I'm dying and are literally deteriorating to find one of these boots. I mean it. Please! Someone help me before I fall apart!




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


In Memory of Co-Founder GREG MILLS ROBINSON, a.k.a. "Marine-KaBar"
(February 17, 1949 - March 5, 2011)