Jump to content


OCP's- It's official

Started by LIFER , May 15 2018 11:20 PM

  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 LIFER

LIFER
  • Members
    • Member ID: 162,954
  • 59 posts

Posted 15 May 2018 - 11:20 PM

The Air Force has now accepted the Army's OCP's. There is a reason to this but could it be something else?



#2 BILL THE PATCH

BILL THE PATCH
  • Members
    • Member ID: 11,207
  • 6,192 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upstate, New York

Posted 16 May 2018 - 04:35 AM

What a ocp?

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk



#3 RedLegGI

RedLegGI
  • Members
    • Member ID: 5,712
  • 1,725 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 16 May 2018 - 05:08 AM

What a ocp?

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk

 

Operational Camouflage Pattern aka Scorpion but not quite multicam
 



#4 Bob Hudson

Bob Hudson

    Forum Co-Founder (Ret)

  • Administrators
    • Member ID: 2
  • 25,323 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 16 May 2018 - 06:30 AM

.

800px-ArmyacuOCP.jpg



#5 Martinjmpr

Martinjmpr
  • Members
    • Member ID: 154,311
  • 626 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denver, CO

Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:34 AM

So it seems things have almost come full circle since I retired in 2005. 

 

From a distance, the colors on the OCP appear very similar to....the woodland BDU!  Yes, the pattern is very different but the dominant colors are mixtures of light and dark green - pretty much like the woodland pattern or even the green-dominant ERDL pattern. 

 

Also good to finally see the USAF at least ditching the "every service has to have a unique combat uniform" notion, something that has always seemed utterly wasteful to me (but then again, I was in during the BDU era when every service wore the exact same combat/utility uniform for ~ 20 years.) 

 

I wonder how many millions of taxpayer dollars could have been saved if they just improved the design of the BDU instead of messing around with the UCP fiasco?   We may never know. 


Edited by Martinjmpr, 16 May 2018 - 09:35 AM.


#6 Kadet

Kadet
  • Members
    • Member ID: 110
  • 3,972 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 16 May 2018 - 11:30 AM

When DoD set out to replace the BDU and DCU uniforms with an updated cut and common pattern, the Army was given the lead, with the intent of fielding a common DoD field uniform. The Marine Corps was dissatisfied with the progress being made by the Army on what would eventually become the ACU. They broke ranks and developed their own patterns (MARPAT). When they did this, the Marine Corps copyrighted the pattern specifically so the Navy would not be able to adopt it. Reportedly the Commandant of the Marine Corps at the time didn't want Sailors mistaken for Marines. This forced the Navy to develop their own patterns, to include the infamous "blueberries". The Air Force was then free to develop the tiger stripe monstrosity. This whole fiasco was a classic case of poor/weak leadership at the Service and DOD levels. As you state, it wasted millions of dollars...


Edited by Kadet, 16 May 2018 - 11:38 AM.


#7 BILL THE PATCH

BILL THE PATCH
  • Members
    • Member ID: 11,207
  • 6,192 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upstate, New York

Posted 16 May 2018 - 01:00 PM

 
Operational Camouflage Pattern aka Scorpion but not quite multicam
 

Thank you

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk



#8 shawnmt6601

shawnmt6601
  • Members
    • Member ID: 9,614
  • 90 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kentucky, USA

Posted 17 May 2018 - 08:30 AM

The Air Force has now accepted the Army's OCP's. There is a reason to this but could it be something else?

 

I thought congress pretty much ordered that the services  had to all adopt and use the same uniform by a certain date to stop with all the unique snowflake uniform fiascos?



#9 Cap Camouflage Pattern I

Cap Camouflage Pattern I
  • Members
    • Member ID: 153,751
  • 2,440 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oklahoma

Posted 17 May 2018 - 09:49 AM

 

I thought congress pretty much ordered that the services  had to all adopt and use the same uniform by a certain date to stop with all the unique snowflake uniform fiascos?

IIRC no service can adopt a camo pattern not already in inventory unless all branches do. So they can't make a new camouflage pattern but they could have stayed with ABU or switched to something in use like OCP or AOR I & II or maybe theoretically switched to something like Woodland, UCP-D, or ERDL, although they would never do that.



#10 Cap Camouflage Pattern I

Cap Camouflage Pattern I
  • Members
    • Member ID: 153,751
  • 2,440 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oklahoma

Posted 17 May 2018 - 09:52 AM

When DoD set out to replace the BDU and DCU uniforms with an updated cut and common pattern, the Army was given the lead, with the intent of fielding a common DoD field uniform. The Marine Corps was dissatisfied with the progress being made by the Army on what would eventually become the ACU. They broke ranks and developed their own patterns (MARPAT). When they did this, the Marine Corps copyrighted the pattern specifically so the Navy would not be able to adopt it. Reportedly the Commandant of the Marine Corps at the time didn't want Sailors mistaken for Marines. This forced the Navy to develop their own patterns, to include the infamous "blueberries". The Air Force was then free to develop the tiger stripe monstrosity. This whole fiasco was a classic case of poor/weak leadership at the Service and DOD levels. As you state, it wasted millions of dollars...

I think the air force and navy could have stayed with Woodland or Desert, I don't think they had to make their mess of uniforms. The probably could have made MARPAT but without the EGA too, because it is just recolored CADPAT, same as UCP.



#11 KRIS FORD

KRIS FORD
  • Members
    • Member ID: 176,157
  • 259 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:In dungarees, headed to the fantail Smoking Head

Posted 20 May 2018 - 04:51 AM

To me..it's a JOKE to have any fleet sailor (except MAAs) wear ANY kind of camo..the blueberries were THE stupidest uniform ever..switching to the green version isn't much better..Navy and camo really don't mix!! We did our most devastating work in dungarees! WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Desert Storm..etc no camo needed for those!

 

I'd rather see my boys (and gals now too..) wearing the utilities from the mid 70's than these awful things. (that says a lot for those who know LOL)

 

ONLY NSW, SWCC, EOD, MAAs should even have any kind of camo in their seabags...otherwise, it seems at least coveralls (albeit all tarted up with embroidery and name tapes) are the preferred underway uniform as the blueberries were NOT any good for shipboard use..I've seen were a 2 piece underway fire resistant uniform was being considered..(just make the damn thing to have dark blue pants and a lighter blue top!!!) Tradition was shat on hardcore..

 

Sorry for the rant LOL


Edited by KRIS FORD, 20 May 2018 - 04:53 AM.



2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users


In Memory of Co-Founder GREG MILLS ROBINSON, a.k.a. "Marine-KaBar"
(February 17, 1949 - March 5, 2011)