Jump to content

WWI Winchester Ordnance MG oil can?


oldabewla
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is a very neat find but puzzled by it? This is a very common WWI- WWII MG oil can but on the back it has a Ordnance label marked Winchester and named to tender of the US Army Ordnance Chief William Crozier from 1901-1917 Crozier presided over the adoption of the M1903 rifle and M1918 BAR and the M1917
I thought this label was cut from a manual and glued on? but all manuals I own don't have any of the maker or manufactory names next to the ordnance information or in the manual it'self. My guess is that these were made up and supplied with the Winchester BAR early in it's roll out? I could be wrong?
The label has been there a very long time and the can has never had any oil in it. The color of the label is the same as first photo and not as second photo. Winchester only made rifles and the only machine guns I know they made for mass production is the BAR.
Craig

 

post-7997-0-74439900-1521937695_thumb.jpg

post-7997-0-01641300-1521937723_thumb.jpg

post-7997-0-88196100-1521937773.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Left over stock later sold as surplus. by Winchester, after the war perhaps, so they slapped the sticker or label on it to show it was one they made?

 

Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess you would have to decide how old the can is. Crozier was promoted to MG in July 1918. So in theory it would have to pre-date that. He did preside over the adoption of the m1918 BAR in 1917 and Winchester started making them in early 18 so it could be some sort of early or commemorative can. Just throwing that information out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a photo of the Label black lighted with no glow, the back ground is a sheet of new white paper. No modern printing ether as check by a magnifying glass.

post-7997-0-72815800-1522026378_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe you could get the glue on the back of the label carbon dated?

 

Wouldn't the cost of the testing be more than the value of the can? Carbon testing isn't cheap, I think.

 

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...