Capt.Confederacy Posted October 3, 2017 Share #1 Posted October 3, 2017 This is a recent addition to my photo collection and looks to be taken in South Vietnam. (The flag on the pole in the background looks like a RVN flag.) My question is this: the uniform of the man in the photo has no unit patches, tapes or rank insignia that I can see. He is obviously armed with what appears to be an M1 carbine but is also carrying a camera. Could he be a war correspondent? Or would there have been a situation in which troops would not be wearing any patches or rank insignia of any kind? Thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kammo-man Posted October 3, 2017 Share #2 Posted October 3, 2017 Early war. Appears to be wearing the WW2 Tropical boots. owen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Confederacy Posted October 4, 2017 Author Share #3 Posted October 4, 2017 Early war. Appears to be wearing the WW2 Tropical boots. owen So maybe during the advisory period, pre-Gulf of Tonkin incident? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwb123 Posted October 4, 2017 Share #4 Posted October 4, 2017 So maybe during the advisory period, pre-Gulf of Tonkin incident? I'd say so. For one thing, he is holding a wood stock M-1 carbine. Plus that folded brim "cowboy" hat, you see these in photos from the early period before boonie hats were in circulation. There appears to be something odd about his shirt pockets as well. I don't see a visible button, the flaps are squared off, and the pockets look a bit large. As noted, there is no rank on his shirt. Advisors in the early days usually wore rank and other insignia to identify them as Americans, even when they wore local uniforms. Some correspondents carried weapons, but I think it was an exception rather than a norm. I don't think he is a photojournalist, as most of the photo guys would carry more than one camera, and bag of film and other gear. He is wearing military issue field gear. He looks older than the average GI. I am wondering if he is a spook or working for another government agency. So until he is identified, he remains a mystery. There is just nothing clear cut here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vintageproductions Posted October 4, 2017 Share #5 Posted October 4, 2017 Shot in the dark, what do the Australian fatigues look like in comparison to this uniform? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kammo-man Posted October 4, 2017 Share #6 Posted October 4, 2017 Thats my hunch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwb123 Posted October 4, 2017 Share #7 Posted October 4, 2017 Hmmm... close. http://www.psywarrior.com/AustralianVNPSYOP.html The photos of the early fatigue uniforms all look to have shoulder straps. I can't tell from the submitted photo if they are there or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Confederacy Posted October 4, 2017 Author Share #8 Posted October 4, 2017 Interesting. I hadn't considered the possibility that he might be an Aussie. While the shirt and it's conspicuous lack of insignia might be a match, the pants are another matter. From what I'm seeing online, the Australians used a type of fatigue pants that had a large, side pocket like the one shown in gwb123's picture. The pants of the mystery man in my pic doesn't have that pocket. I would guess that if he were an Aussie, he'd have both the correct shirt as well as the correct pants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwb123 Posted October 4, 2017 Share #9 Posted October 4, 2017 Not necessarily. These photos are from the early part of the Vietnam War, and the uniforms do not have the cargo pocket. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniforms_of_the_Australian_Army One thing I thought of was whether or not the Australian military used M-1 carbines during the Vietnam War. Another thing that takes us back to being a civilian... from what I read, many of them bought their field uniforms from the local markets after arriving in country. That might explain why this individual had a hodgepodge of uniform parts. He may well of had an Australian shirt with American trousers. By the way, the upturned flap on the jungle hat is on the opposite side of what the Aussies used for their digger hats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Confederacy Posted October 5, 2017 Author Share #10 Posted October 5, 2017 Thanks for all the input, guys. I guess the mystery man will remain a mystery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwb123 Posted October 5, 2017 Share #11 Posted October 5, 2017 You could always try searching Google images for Vietnam ear war correspondents and see if anyone similar shows up. Time consuming, I realize, but you never know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now