ocsfollowme Posted November 24, 2015 Share #1 Posted November 24, 2015 Two recent pick ups. Interesting that they have variations on the back panel. Slightly different in size too. I have been hunting for one of these for a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patchcollector Posted November 24, 2015 Share #2 Posted November 24, 2015 Neat pieces.I really like this units' patch design. Here is a link to one I recently found mixed in with a group of newer patches: http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/index.php?/topic/238481-a-british-troops-in-norway-patchalso-worn-by-us-personnel/?hl=%2Bnorway+%2Bpatch In my thread you can see pics of some interesting variations of this insignia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garth Thompson Posted November 25, 2015 Share #3 Posted November 25, 2015 The correct term for this is British Troops in Norway. It is a british army formation sign but was used by some US forces who worked with the British army in Norway. I have only seen two versions on US uniforms, a bullion one and a printed one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pathfinder505 Posted November 25, 2015 Share #4 Posted November 25, 2015 I have only seen one on a uniform and that was the printed version. Never had the opportunity to see the bullion one on a uniform but hopefully someday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabrejet Posted November 25, 2015 Share #5 Posted November 25, 2015 Very nice! Here's another variant currently on the forum. http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/index.php?/topic/254863-nice-us-british-forces-norway-patch-rare-49500-usd/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phillock Posted November 25, 2015 Share #6 Posted November 25, 2015 Hi all Question , so if you pick up a BT in Norway Formation sign/SSI, where would you put that in your collection , British or American (or as worn by)? I would , for example, put under British without any provenance to being American or if I had provenance as being worn by American then American. Your thoughts would be appreciated. Phill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patchcollector Posted November 26, 2015 Share #7 Posted November 26, 2015 I tend to focus more on who could have worn it rather than who it was originally designed for.Without provenance it is impossible to determine if an American or British wore it so I keep mine with my American patches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doyler Posted November 26, 2015 Share #8 Posted November 26, 2015 http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/index.php?/topic/247223-other-uniform-from-the-weekendnot-airborne/?fromsearch=1 Heres one I have.Unamed but original. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firefighter Posted November 27, 2015 Share #9 Posted November 27, 2015 Those are some nice patches Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phillock Posted November 27, 2015 Share #10 Posted November 27, 2015 I tend to focus more on who could have worn it rather than who it was originally designed for.Without provenance it is impossible to determine if an American or British wore it so I keep mine with my American patches. Thanks PC interesting POV. Phill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ocsfollowme Posted March 3, 2018 Author Share #11 Posted March 3, 2018 I inquired about cutting the black backing off of the reverse one (left side pictured) to UC Irvine for carbon dating. Should be interesting! Anyone ever hear of doing carbon dating on WW2 patches for authenticity? =) The science of collecting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Airborne-Hunter Posted March 3, 2018 Share #12 Posted March 3, 2018 I inquired about cutting the black backing off of the reverse one (left side pictured) to UC Irvine for carbon dating. Should be interesting! Anyone ever hear of doing carbon dating on WW2 patches for authenticity? =) The science of collecting. I don't think carbon dating will provide a year. Instead it will provide a range. Also, I believe, that range, at its narrowest, is 20-50 years. e.g. 1920-1970. I know there are several versions of the patch. Never seen a bullion, but I know printed versions were on uniforms and have one ID'd to a major. I think I have seen a machine made one on twill on a US uniform as well, but I never handled it in person. Best ABN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ocsfollowme Posted March 3, 2018 Author Share #13 Posted March 3, 2018 I don't think carbon dating will provide a year. Instead it will provide a range. Also, I believe, that range, at its narrowest, is 20-50 years. e.g. 1920-1970. I know there are several versions of the patch. Never seen a bullion, but I know printed versions were on uniforms and have one ID'd to a major. I think I have seen a machine made one on twill on a US uniform as well, but I never handled it in person. Best ABN This was what my inquiry was. I am hoping that chemicals in 1960s-1970s fabrics could be picked up. I am sure reproductions of WW2 patches could have started in the 1950s but were obviously less prevalent when you could call your uncle to get your hands on an original. It will be an interesting to hear back from the lab with their thoughts if it can even be done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mortaydc60 Posted March 3, 2018 Share #14 Posted March 3, 2018 Surprised that no one has brought up fact that the patches posted in the original post have a black border, never saw that on any original version of the patch. Maybe not a border but continuation of back of patch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teamski Posted March 5, 2018 Share #15 Posted March 5, 2018 Definitely not US. Thread should be locked. -Ski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vintageproductions Posted March 5, 2018 Share #16 Posted March 5, 2018 But worn by US servicemen, so it will stay open. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patchcollector Posted March 5, 2018 Share #17 Posted March 5, 2018 The thing I find fascinating with these patches is the wide range of variations. Here is a spectacular bullion example that I had found an image of and posted within my thread that I linked to in post # 2 of this thread. It was from an OSS group that IIRC,sold for around 10k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phillock Posted March 5, 2018 Share #18 Posted March 5, 2018 Definitely not US. Thread should be locked. -Ski From a good friend of mine-note how thick the bullion captains bars. Phill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teamski Posted March 5, 2018 Share #19 Posted March 5, 2018 Copy that! Now if I can see a legit US uniform with a Chindits patch ....... -Ski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ocsfollowme Posted March 5, 2018 Author Share #20 Posted March 5, 2018 Well I heard back from UC Irvine I work down the street at Concordia and collect original WW2 era US related military patches. I have two patches, that may be reproductions made in the 1970s in England. One has a backing material that I would like to cut off and submit as a sample. Is is typical for "theatre made" patches that were down outside of the US during 1941-1947 to have variations between two patches (which is why one is sewn through the backing and the other is not). An original version of these can fetch $400-600 and I am writing an article on this patch for publication: Allied Troops in Norway--and all of the known variations of it. There have been at least 7-8 known examples of this variation and it is the one that has many patch collectors scratching their heads on its authenticity. Would this sample work to be able to pin down if the fabric was made in the 1930/1940s as opposed to post 1950? The patch measure about 2.5" square. If you confirm that you could move forward on the testing I will submit the appropriate paperwork. Thanks in advance, Their response below Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunslinger Posted March 20, 2018 Share #21 Posted March 20, 2018 Not a fan of these, they look like Reproductions made in the U.K. from the 80's. Some may already know the history behind these, the British Troops in Norway insignia were worn by British, Americans and Free Norwegian Forces during the disarming of the Germans at the end of the war and to re-establish the Norwegian Govt. Here are a pair of printed version that are off tunic and ID'd CDub Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mortaydc60 Posted March 22, 2018 Share #22 Posted March 22, 2018 Just to clarify Gunslinger you are saying that the patches in the original post are reproductions and not the printed versions shown in #21. In not such a direct manner I suggested the same in post #14. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunslinger Posted March 22, 2018 Share #23 Posted March 22, 2018 Correct, the black border embroidered pair in post #1 look like Reproductions. The printed pair i'd posted in post #21 are text book Originals made by Calico. These were the very first first issue to British, American and Free Norwegians. CDub Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now