cutiger83 Posted September 25, 2014 Share #1 Posted September 25, 2014 I saw this in the latest issue of World War II and thought it was interesting: Congress legislated the temporary rank of General of the Army, with five stars, on December 14, 1944 and on March 23, 1946, made that rank permanent. The first and only holders of the five star rank, and their dates of appointment are George C Marshall – December 16, 1944Douglas MacArthur – December 18, 1944Dwight D Eisenhower – December 20, 1944Henry H Arnold – December 21, 1944 (redesignated General of the Air Force May 7, 1949 making him twice a five star general)Omar N Bradley – September 20, 1950 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan H. Posted September 25, 2014 Share #2 Posted September 25, 2014 Hi Kat- We should probably add the Admirals who made the exalted 5 star rank of Fleet Admiral to the post. They are- William D. Leahy – December 15, 1944,Ernest J. King – December 17, 1944,Chester W. Nimitz – December 19, 1944,William F. Halsey, Jr. – December 11, 1945 Allan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cutiger83 Posted September 25, 2014 Author Share #3 Posted September 25, 2014 We should probably add the Admirals who made the exalted 5 star rank of Fleet Admiral to the post. Thanks for adding these. Great information! ....Kat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12A54 Posted September 25, 2014 Share #4 Posted September 25, 2014 I recall hearing that the US considered adding the rank of "Field Marshal" because they had no equivalent rank and it was common amongst allies. What dissuaded them was the name of the most senior US officer to whom that rank would be conferred, General Marshall. They opted instead for "General of the Army". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cutiger83 Posted September 25, 2014 Author Share #5 Posted September 25, 2014 I recall hearing that the US considered adding the rank of "Field Marshal" because they had no equivalent rank and it was common amongst allies. What dissuaded them was the name of the most senior US officer to whom that rank would be conferred, General Marshall. They opted instead for "General of the Army". Interesting. I wonder if this is true or an old urban myth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hink441 Posted September 25, 2014 Share #6 Posted September 25, 2014 Looking at appointment dates, Admiral William Leahy was the senior military officer during WW2. Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12A54 Posted September 25, 2014 Share #7 Posted September 25, 2014 "As for why America never adopted the pinnacle rank, one may be forgiven for thinking it was thanks to George C. Marshall (see photo above), the very first 5-star army general (field marshal equivalent) of the United States. Field Marshal Marshall would have sounded undignified, and leads immediately to the theory that President Roosevelt out of deference to his chief military advisor (in Churchill's words, the "organizer of victory", the man who, after all, expanded the size of U.S. military forces forty fold), instead proposed a new rank to Congress called "General of the Army". The rank was duly approved and General Marshall was promoted on December 15, 1944." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uniformcollector Posted September 25, 2014 Share #8 Posted September 25, 2014 Here's an interesting article from Defense Tech that you might find interesting: On a cold December evening in 1783 at Fraunces Tavern in lower Manhattan, Gen. George Washington bade farewell to his staff and resigned his command of the Continental Army. One hundred ninety three years later, on America’s Bicentennial, Congress posthumously promoted Washington to five-star “General of the Armies of the United States.” Washington led the Continental Army against the British for eight years, the longest tenure for a combatant (wartime) commander in our history to be awarded a fifth star. But David Petraeus, who begins his eighth year as a combatant commander (presently as theatre commander in Afghanistan), will soon eclipse Washington’s tenure. In appropriate recognition of his long and extraordinary wartime service, the new Congress should authorize a fifth star for Gen. Petraeus, thereby promoting him to “General of the Army”—just below Washington’s rank of “General of the Armies” (plural). After George Washington, the only other five-star “General of the Armies of the United States” was John Pershing, who was promoted to the rank after commanding U.S. forces in World War I. The nine remaining five star generals in our history were branch-specific commanders during World War II: Gens. Dwight Eisenhower, Douglas MacArthur, George Marshall, Omar Bradley and Henry Arnold were each “General of the Army.” Navy Adms. Chester Nimitz, William Halsey, Ernest King and William Leahy served as five-star “Fleet Admirals.” Each of these officers received the honor during wartime, with the exception of Halsey, who was awarded the fifth star three months after World War II ended, and Bradley, who was awarded his fifth star in 1950. Like these great leaders, Gen. Petraeus’s breath of experience and outstanding results deserve to be recognized and honored. His wartime tenure began as the Commanding General of the 101st Airborne Division, responsible for over 10,000 combat troops during the initial invasion of Iraq. He led the 101st in an airborne assault into northern Iraq and then quieted the city of Mosul. Gen. Petraeus then oversaw the creation and training of the new Iraqi Army, a Herculean task that was accomplished amid a rapidly deteriorating security situation. By the time he was through, he had stood up, equipped and trained over 100,000 Iraqi soldiers. They would be crucial in winning the peace in the years to follow. In 2005, Gen. Petraeus led the Army’s command responsible for education and doctrine at Fort Leavenworth, Kan. There he wrote the Army’s manual on counterinsurgency operations. His COIN manual was the blueprint for the upcoming troop “surge,” which saved Iraq from the brink of calamity. Gen. Petraeus left Fort Leavenworth in 2007 to take his new playbook to Iraq, where he became commander of coalition forces. He engineered one of the most stunning turnarounds in the history of modern warfare. Within 18 months, the general and his troops defeated al Qaeda in Anbar, ended a civil war in Baghdad, sealed porous borders with Iran and Syria, and created a sense of normalcy in Iraq. After succeeding in the face of near-unanimous doubt, Gen. Petraeus was promoted to commander of Central Command in 2008, where he would oversee a two-front war in Iraq and Afghanistan. His tour at Centcom was cut short, however, when President Barack Obama asked him to replace the dismissed Gen. Stanley McCrystal in Afghanistan. It was a step down on the career ladder for Gen. Petraeus — but he was the president’s last hope to turn around Afghanistan. Demonstrating classic statesmanship, Gen. Petraeus relinquished his more prestigious post at Centcom. The U.S. war against terrorism is now the longest war in U.S. history, and Gen. Petraeus has clearly distinguished himself as a leader worthy of joining the ranks of Gens. MacArthur, Marshall and Nimitz. A promotion would properly honor his service — and it would also honor the troops he leads and has led. Today’s soldiers have fought as valiantly as any in American history, and they deserve recognition of their leaders. Congressional approval of a fifth star would demonstrate the nation’s commitment to their mission. David Petraeus is also a Soldier-statesmen who works with foreign diplomats and generals in hotspots across the globe. The prestige that would come with a fifth star would also likely help the U.S. in its negotiations with neighboring states — and show the enemies of freedom that we are fully committed to the war against terrorism. It has been more than half a century since a U.S. general was awarded a fifth star. David Petraeus’s generalship has spanned 11 years, three presidents and seven Congresses. It is time to promote him to “General of the Army” and award him a fifth star. Our military deserves it, and he has certainly earned it. Read more: http://defensetech.org/2011/01/13/a-fifth-star-for-general-petraeus/#ixzz3ENBsSyR6 Defense.org Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hink441 Posted September 26, 2014 Share #9 Posted September 26, 2014 I respectfully do not agree with the above article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uniformcollector Posted September 26, 2014 Share #10 Posted September 26, 2014 I respectfully do not agree with the above article. Neither do I. I believe that there probably will no longer be a need for any future 5 star Generals since we will most likely never need someone to hold that high of a position. I just thought it was interesting that there was a debate for another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeclown Posted October 21, 2014 Share #11 Posted October 21, 2014 Admiral Dewey was made Admiral of the Navy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now