Tony-in-NH Posted November 7, 2007 Share #1 Posted November 7, 2007 Here are two I just picked up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mk1rceme Posted November 7, 2007 Share #2 Posted November 7, 2007 Man! Those things would do some damage. I would love to get my hands on one of those but our laws say that dusters are illegal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spathologist Posted November 8, 2007 Share #3 Posted November 8, 2007 Can you please confirm the serial number on the top knife? I track M1913 serial numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony-in-NH Posted November 8, 2007 Author Share #4 Posted November 8, 2007 Can you please confirm the serial number on the top knife? I track M1913 serial numbers. Serial # 11228 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunbarrel Posted November 8, 2007 Share #5 Posted November 8, 2007 Here are two I just picked up Tony, Outstanding pieces, as usual. The top one is most interesting. It sports the bottom section of the Patton saber blade and it comes with a tooled leather sheath, both typical characteristics of the San Antonio Iron Works knives, but I've never seen a SAIW knife with a knuckle grip. It is an outstanding combination. Do you have any information on it? GB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spathologist Posted November 8, 2007 Share #6 Posted November 8, 2007 Serial # 11228 Thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony-in-NH Posted November 8, 2007 Author Share #7 Posted November 8, 2007 Tony, Outstanding pieces, as usual. The top one is most interesting. It sports the bottom section of the Patton saber blade and it comes with a tooled leather sheath, both typical characteristics of the San Antonio Iron Works knives, but I've never seen a SAIW knife with a knuckle grip. It is an outstanding combination. Do you have any information on it? GB It does not have Patton sword blade. Has bayo blade, one side has SA, flaming bomb and 1904 date. The otherside has US and 11228. I believe it may have AUSSIE roots as knuckles are similar to EVERETT KNUCKLE, only they are larger. It also could have been made aboard a ship. It definately is high quality made as evidenced by the detail on the handle. Blade fit is also excellent. Other than that anybodies guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spathologist Posted November 9, 2007 Share #8 Posted November 9, 2007 Sorry, but that's not a bayo blade. That's the ricasso section of a M1913 Cavalry saber and a 1914 date. I'll bet a Coke on it. And looking at the fuller in the middle of the blade of your second knife, I'd hazard a guess that it's made from an upper section of a cut M1913 saber blade. Pic below for comparison: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony-in-NH Posted November 9, 2007 Author Share #9 Posted November 9, 2007 Sorry, but that's not a bayo blade. That's the ricasso section of a M1913 Cavalry saber and a 1914 date. I'll bet a Coke on it. And looking at the fuller in the middle of the blade of your second knife, I'd hazard a guess that it's made from an upper section of a cut M1913 saber blade. Pic below for comparison: I will bow to your opinion. Never to old to get educated. I still consider myself a student at this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spathologist Posted November 9, 2007 Share #10 Posted November 9, 2007 I will bow to your opinion. Never to old to get educated. I still consider myself a student at this. Everyone is still a student at this. If you look at the bayonets in use at the time, they are either of the rod type or single-edged blade type. Your knife was obviously made from something with double edges and a deep central fuller. A pretty good site for basic info on Springfield Armory blades: http://www.springfieldedge.com/index.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunbarrel Posted November 9, 2007 Share #11 Posted November 9, 2007 And like Gary Cunningham told Tony on another forum, bayonets in that date would have had serial numbers much higher than 11228 (in the area of 585,000 to 605,000) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony-in-NH Posted November 9, 2007 Author Share #12 Posted November 9, 2007 And like Gary Cunningham told Tony on another forum, bayonets in that date would have had serial numbers much higher than 11228 (in the area of 585,000 to 605,000) Thank you for the link it has been bookmarked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now